Do social media interventions increase vaccine uptake?

Francesca Maria Grosso, Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre, Roberto Grosso, Federica Di Mauro, Chiara Greco, Silvia Greco, Nicola Laforgia, Antonio Di Mauro
Author Information
  1. Francesca Maria Grosso: Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Postgraduate School of Public Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  2. Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre: Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
  3. Roberto Grosso: Pediatric Primary Care, National Pediatric Health Care System, Bari, Italy.
  4. Federica Di Mauro: Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority of Bari, Bari, Italy.
  5. Chiara Greco: Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Hygiene and Preventive Medicine (Public Health), Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
  6. Silvia Greco: Department of Pediatrics, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
  7. Nicola Laforgia: Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
  8. Antonio Di Mauro: Pediatric Primary Care, National Pediatric Health Care System, Margherita di Savoia, Barletta-Andria-Trani, Italy.

Abstract

Introduction: The Italian mass COVID-19 vaccination campaign has included children aged 5-11 years as part of the target population since December 2021. One of the biggest challenges to vaccine uptake was vaccine hesitancy among parents and children's caregivers. Primary care pediatricians (PCPs), as the first point of contact between the National Health Service (NHS) and parents/caretakers, initiated various communication strategies to tackle this hesitancy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a PCP-led social media intervention and a digital reminder service (DRS) on parental hesitancy regarding vaccinating their 5-11-year-old children against COVID-19.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was designed, and the chosen target populations were parents and caretakers of children aged 5-11 years. Two PCP cohorts were recruited. The first group received a social media intervention and a DRS; while the second group did not. Both cohorts had access to traditional face-to-face and telephone-based counseling. The vaccination coverage rate in the two groups was evaluated.
Results: A total of 600 children were enrolled. The exposed cohort (277 patients) received social media intervention, DRS, and counseling options (face-to-face and telephone-based), whereas the non-exposed cohort (323 patients) received only counseling options. In total, 89 patients from the exposed cohort did not receive any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (32.5%), 165 were fully immunized (59.5%), and 23 received only one dose (8.5%). A total of 150 non-exposed patients did not receive any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (47%), 147 were fully immunized (45.5%), and 24 only received one dose (7.4%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (chi square = 11.5016; = 0.0006).
Conclusion: Social media and DRS interventions had a positive impact on vaccine uptake and may be helpful in tackling vaccine hesitancy. Better-designed studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;10:873098 [PMID: 35570888]
  2. EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jun;48:101454 [PMID: 35611343]
  3. BMJ. 2015 Mar 02;350:h904 [PMID: 25733592]
  4. Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 05;10:869893 [PMID: 35450111]
  5. Can Fam Physician. 2021 May;67(5):339-341 [PMID: 33980625]
  6. Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S24-S29 [PMID: 33958087]
  7. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Nov 2;17(11):4470-4486 [PMID: 34473589]
  8. Ital J Pediatr. 2021 Aug 11;47(1):171 [PMID: 34380533]
  9. Adv Prev Med. 2012;2012:932741 [PMID: 23082253]
  10. Acta Paediatr. 2021 Mar;110(3):942-943 [PMID: 33047328]
  11. J Health Psychol. 2010 Apr;15(3):446-55 [PMID: 20348365]
  12. Health Commun. 2012;27(8):829-36 [PMID: 22452582]
  13. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Dec 20;3(Suppl 3):e001188 [PMID: 30622747]
  14. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 7;32(17):1901-20 [PMID: 24530401]
  15. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10): [PMID: 33097547]
  16. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  17. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):5966 [PMID: 35474313]
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 08;5:CD010038 [PMID: 29736980]
  19. Vaccine. 2018 Nov 26;36(49):7556-7561 [PMID: 30389192]
  20. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001668 [PMID: 31478031]

MeSH Term

Child
Humans
Child, Preschool
COVID-19 Vaccines
Prospective Studies
Social Media
State Medicine
COVID-19
Vaccines

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines
Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinemediahesitancysocialreceivedCOVID-19childrenDRScohortpatientsdose5%interventioncounselingtotalvaccinationcampaignaged5-11yearstargetuptakeparentscarefirststudyimpactcohortsgroupface-to-facetelephone-basedtwogroupsexposedoptionsnon-exposedreceivefullyimmunizedone=interventionsIntroduction:ItalianmassincludedpartpopulationsinceDecember2021Onebiggestchallengesamongchildren'scaregiversPrimarypediatriciansPCPspointcontactNationalHealthServiceNHSparents/caretakersinitiatedvariouscommunicationstrategiestackleaimsevaluatePCP-leddigitalreminderserviceparentalregardingvaccinating5-11-year-oldMethods:prospectivedesignedchosenpopulationscaretakersTwoPCPrecruitedsecondaccesstraditionalcoveragerateevaluatedResults:600enrolled277whereas32389321655923815047%147452474%differencestatisticallysignificantchisquare11501600006Conclusion:SocialpositivemayhelpfultacklingBetter-designedstudiesneededcorroboratefindingsincreaseuptake?COVID-19primarysetting

Similar Articles

Cited By