The causal association between peripheral blood eosinophils and nasal polyps: a Mendelian randomization study.

Guan-Jiang Huang, Zi-Qing Chen, Zhi-Jun Fan, Shao-Hua Li
Author Information
  1. Guan-Jiang Huang: Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China. ORCID
  2. Zi-Qing Chen: Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
  3. Zhi-Jun Fan: Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China. zhijunfanzyy@outlook.com.
  4. Shao-Hua Li: Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China. 16035637@qq.com.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Observational studies suggested that peripheral blood eosinophils were associated with the risk of nasal polyps. However, these studies did not confirm the causality. This study aims to apply Mendelian randomization (MR) method to comprehensively assess the potential causal association between peripheral blood eosinophils and nasal polyps.
METHODS: Genetic instrumental variables were extracted from the largest available genome-wide association study (GWAS) of European participants, which were used to investigate the relationship between peripheral blood eosinophils and nasal polyps. The inverse variance weighted method, the MR Egger method, and the weighted median method were applied for this analysis. MR-Egger intercept tests, leave-one-out analyses, and funnel plots were performed for the sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: With the inverse variance weighted method, the MR analysis suggested that there was a significant difference between peripheral blood eosinophils and the risk of nasal polyps (ukb-a-97, OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.005, p < 0.001; ukb-a-541, OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.004-1.006, p < 0.001; ukb-b-7211, OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.005, p < 0.001; ukb-b-8425, OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.005, p < 0.001; finn-b-J10_NASALPOLYP, OR 3.089, 95% CI 2.537-3.761, p < 0.001). Consistent results were also proved by using the weighted median method and the MR Egger method.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal the causal effect of peripheral blood eosinophils on the increased risk of nasal polyps.

Keywords

References

  1. Hopkins C (2019) Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. N Engl J Med 381:55–63 [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1800215]
  2. Bachert C, Han JK, Desrosiers M et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet 394:1638–1650 [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1]
  3. Agache I, Song Y, Alonso-Coello P et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review for the EAACI guidelines. Allergy 76:2337–2353 [DOI: 10.1111/all.14809]
  4. Pongdee T, Bielinski SJ, Decker PA, Kita H, Larson NB (2022) White blood cells and chronic rhinosinusitis: a Mendelian randomization study. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 18:98 [DOI: 10.1186/s13223-022-00739-2]
  5. Luo Q, Zhou S, Yuan B et al (2023) Blood eosinophil count in the diagnosis of allergic-like rhinitis with chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 48:339–346 [DOI: 10.1111/coa.13990]
  6. Delemarre T, Holtappels G, De Ruyck N et al (2020) Type 2 inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps: Another  relevant endotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol 146:337–343 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.040]
  7. Wang Z, Wang Q, Duan S et al (2022) A diagnostic model for predicting type 2 nasal polyps using biomarkers in nasal secretion. Front Immunol 13:1054201 [DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1054201]
  8. Gevaert P, Lang-Loidolt D, Lackner A et al (2006) Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5 treatment in patients with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118:1133–1141 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.05.031]
  9. Davies NM, Holmes MV, Davey SG (2018) Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362:k601 [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k601]
  10. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA, Timpson N, Davey SG (2008) Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med 27:1133–1163 [DOI: 10.1002/sim.3034]
  11. Richmond RC, Davey SG (2022) Mendelian randomization: concepts and scope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 12:a040501 [DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040501]
  12. Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf B et al (2021) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA 326:1614–1621 [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236]
  13. Zhang Z, Li G, Yu L et al (2022) Causal relationships between potential risk factors and chronic rhinosinusitis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280:2785–2793 [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07798-6]
  14. Park S, Lee S, Kim Y et al (2021) Atrial fibrillation and kidney function: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Eur Heart J 42:2816–2823 [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab291]
  15. Wei Y, Zhan Y, Carlsson S (2023) Childhood adiposity and novel subtypes of diabetes in adults: a Mendelian randomisation and genome-wide genetic correlation study. Lancet Glob Health 11(Suppl 1):S1 [DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00086-4]
  16. Emdin CA, Khera AV, Kathiresan S (2017) Mendelian randomization. JAMA 318:1925–1926 [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.17219]
  17. Seah JJ, Thong M, Wang Y (2023) The diagnostic and prognostic role of biomarkers in chronic rhinosinusitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 13:715 [DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040715]
  18. Deng J, Wang Z, Xu Z et al (2023) Blood eosinophils to direct oral corticosteroid treatment for patients with nasal polyps - an open label, non-inferiority, randomized control trial. Rhinology.  https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.328 [DOI: 10.4193/Rhin22.328]
  19. Benson VS, Fu Q, Yang S et al (2023) Real-world characterisation of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with and without surgery in England. Clin Otolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14070 [DOI: 10.1111/coa.14070]
  20. Bachert C, Han JK, Desrosiers MY et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 149:1309–1317 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.030]

MeSH Term

Humans
Eosinophils
Nasal Polyps
Genome-Wide Association Study
Mendelian Randomization Analysis
Causality
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01bloodmethodperipheraleosinophilsnasalpolypsOR95%CIp < 0001MRweighted005riskstudyMendelianrandomizationcausalassociationanalysis004003-1studiessuggestedinversevarianceEggermedianOBJECTIVE:ObservationalassociatedHoweverconfirmcausalityaimsapplycomprehensivelyassesspotentialMETHODS:Geneticinstrumentalvariablesextractedlargestavailablegenome-wideGWASEuropeanparticipantsusedinvestigaterelationshipappliedMR-Eggerintercepttestsleave-one-outanalysesfunnelplotsperformedsensitivityRESULTS:significantdifferenceukb-a-97ukb-a-541004-1006ukb-b-7211ukb-b-8425finn-b-J10_NASALPOLYP30892537-3761ConsistentresultsalsoprovedusingCONCLUSIONS:findingsrevealeffectincreasedpolyps:CausalityNasalpolypPeripheraleosinophilRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By