A single-arm study design with non-inferiority and superiority time-to-event endpoints: a tool for proof-of-concept and de-intensification strategies in breast cancer.

Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Bernat Miguel-Huguet, Andrea Malfettone, Elena López-Miranda, María Gion, Elena Abad, Daniel Alcalá-López, Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo, José Manuel Pérez-García, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Javier Cortés
Author Information
  1. Miguel Sampayo-Cordero: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Bernat Miguel-Huguet: Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català De La Salud, Hospital Universitari De Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Andrea Malfettone: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  4. Elena López-Miranda: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  5. María Gion: Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  6. Elena Abad: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  7. Daniel Alcalá-López: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  8. Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  9. José Manuel Pérez-García: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  10. Antonio Llombart-Cussac: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
  11. Javier Cortés: Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

De-escalation trials in oncology evaluate therapies that aim to improve the quality of life of patients with low-risk cancer by avoiding overtreatment. Non-inferiority randomized trials are commonly used to investigate de-intensified regimens with similar efficacy to that of standard regimens but with fewer adverse effects (ESMO evidence tier A). In cases where it is not feasible to recruit the number of patients needed for a randomized trial, single-arm prospective studies with a hypothesis of non-inferiority can be conducted as an alternative. Single-arm studies are also commonly used to evaluate novel treatment strategies (ESMO evidence tier B). A single-arm design that includes both non-inferiority and superiority primary objectives will enable the ranking of clinical activity and other parameters such as safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics data. Here, we describe the statistical principles and procedures to support such a strategy. The non-inferiority margin is calculated using the fixed margin method. Sample size and statistical analyses are based on the maximum likelihood method for exponential distributions. We present example analyses in metastatic and adjuvant settings to illustrate the usefulness of our methodology. We also explain its implementation with nonparametric methods. Single-arm designs with non-inferiority and superiority analyses are optimal for proof-of-concept and de-escalation studies in oncology.

Keywords

References

  1. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Nov 28;20:100678 [PMID: 33336109]
  2. Stat Med. 2011 Jun 15;30(13):1618-27 [PMID: 21351286]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;17(18): [PMID: 32927819]
  4. Stat Med. 2001 Apr 15;20(7):1023-32 [PMID: 11276033]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29 [PMID: 27557300]
  6. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 06;13(16): [PMID: 34439126]
  7. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):545-554 [PMID: 28238593]
  8. Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2591-2598 [PMID: 31178155]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2641-7 [PMID: 20406933]
  10. Histopathology. 2022 Jan;80(2):291-303 [PMID: 34379814]
  11. Ann Oncol. 2022 Jul;33(7):702-712 [PMID: 35550723]
  12. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Apr;19(2):105-112 [PMID: 30679100]
  13. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;13:17588359211059587 [PMID: 34868353]
  14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Dec 1;111(12):1255-1262 [PMID: 31218346]
  15. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1868-1875 [PMID: 30939096]
  16. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926 [PMID: 28898379]
  17. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):858-871 [PMID: 34019819]
  18. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):170-179 [PMID: 32779045]
  19. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2501-7 [PMID: 26338195]
  20. Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May 08;12:457-467 [PMID: 32440224]
  21. Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Jun 22;8:690615 [PMID: 34239895]
  22. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):219 [PMID: 11560551]
  23. Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2599-2612 [PMID: 31178152]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121 [PMID: 29860917]
  25. Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1235-1248 [PMID: 34085764]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92 [PMID: 10861325]
  27. Stat Biopharm Res. 2017;9(1):25-34 [PMID: 28966721]
  28. Trials. 2019 Aug 30;20(1):544 [PMID: 31470902]
  29. Stat Med. 2014 May 30;33(12):2004-16 [PMID: 24338995]
  30. Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3885-95 [PMID: 22807126]
  31. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Apr 11;3:11 [PMID: 28649651]
  32. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):465-475 [PMID: 28767357]
  33. Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):562-566 [PMID: 32666813]
  34. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Jan;52:12-21 [PMID: 27883925]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0non-inferioritysingle-armsuperioritystudiesanalysestrialsoncologyevaluatepatientscancerrandomizedcommonlyusedregimensESMOevidencetiertrialSingle-armalsostrategiesdesignclinicalstatisticalmarginmethodproof-of-concepttime-to-eventDe-escalationtherapiesaimimprovequalitylifelow-riskavoidingovertreatmentNon-inferiorityinvestigatede-intensifiedsimilarefficacystandardfeweradverseeffectscasesfeasiblerecruitnumberneededprospectivehypothesiscanconductedalternativenoveltreatmentBincludesprimaryobjectiveswillenablerankingactivityparameterssafetypharmacokineticspharmacodynamicsdatadescribeprinciplesproceduressupportstrategycalculatedusingfixedSamplesizebasedmaximumlikelihoodexponentialdistributionspresentexamplemetastaticadjuvantsettingsillustrateusefulnessmethodologyexplainimplementationnonparametricmethodsdesignsoptimalde-escalationstudyendpoints:toolde-intensificationbreastphaseII

Similar Articles

Cited By