Asymmetric interactions between barley yellow dwarf virus -PAV and wheat dwarf virus in wheat.

Thomas Armand, Marlène Souquet, Luâna Korn, Kevin Gauthier, Emmanuel Jacquot
Author Information
  1. Thomas Armand: PHIM Plant Health Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Institut Agro, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.
  2. Marlène Souquet: PHIM Plant Health Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Institut Agro, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.
  3. Luâna Korn: PHIM Plant Health Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Institut Agro, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.
  4. Kevin Gauthier: PHIM Plant Health Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Institut Agro, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.
  5. Emmanuel Jacquot: PHIM Plant Health Institute Montpellier, University of Montpellier, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Institut Agro, French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Montpellier, France.

Abstract

The deciphering of the epidemiology of a plant virus has long been focused on the study of interactions between partners of one pathosystem. However, plants are exposed to numerous viruses which lead to frequent co-infection scenarios. This can change characteristics of virus-vector-host interactions and could impact the epidemiology of viral diseases. Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV (BYDV-PAV; species: ; genus ), wheat dwarf virus (WDV; genus ) and their respective vectors (BYDV-PAV: e.g. and WDV: ) are commonly found in cereal fields. Wheat plants co-infected with BYDV-PAV and WDV have been reported from field surveys, although epidemiological outcomes of BYDV-PAV - WDV interactions have not yet been studied. Experiments were carried out to evaluate and compare, through different competition scenarios (i.e. single- and co- (simultaneous and sequential) inoculations), the efficiency of BYDV-PAV and WDV to infect, to accumulate in and to be spread between wheat plants. Moreover, the impact of competition scenarios on the biological parameters of these two viruses was evaluated at different stages of the infection and with plants at different ages at inoculation. Results showed i) that these viruses achieve their infection cycle and their plant-to-plant transmission with different efficiencies and ii) BYDV-PAV - WDV interactions lead to different phenotypes ranging from antagonism to synergism. Finally, when these two viruses share a host, the nature and strength of virus-virus interactions varied depending on the order of virus arrival, stages of the infection cycle and plant age at inoculation. Precisely, the introduction (i.e. co- and sequential inoculation) and infection process (i.e. virus accumulation) of BYDV-PAV in a wheat benefit from the presence of WDV. For the latter, the sympatry with BYDV-PAV exerts opposite pressure on parameters involved in virus introduction (i.e. benefit during sequential inoculation) and spread (i.e. lower transmission efficiency and virus accumulation in co-infected plants). In the context of increased potential exposure of crops to insect vectors, this study participates in a better understanding of the impact of BYDV-PAV and WDV co-infections on biological and ecological parameters of the diseases induced by these viruses.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 30;9:326 [PMID: 18667053]
  2. Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Jul;76(7):2276-2285 [PMID: 32243081]
  3. Phytopathology. 2020 Jan;110(1):29-48 [PMID: 31544593]
  4. Plant Dis. 2020 May;104(5):1407-1414 [PMID: 32150505]
  5. Phytopathology. 2005 Oct;95(10):1151-6 [PMID: 18943467]
  6. C R Biol. 2010 Jun-Jul;333(6-7):524-38 [PMID: 20541164]
  7. Phytopathology. 2000 Sep;90(9):1043-8 [PMID: 18944532]
  8. J Gen Virol. 1977 Mar;34(3):475-83 [PMID: 323416]
  9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 27;365(1548):1907-18 [PMID: 20478886]
  10. Phytopathology. 2000 Aug;90(8):860-6 [PMID: 18944507]
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 05;281(1781):20133374 [PMID: 24598426]
  12. Curr Opin Virol. 2014 Oct;8:62-7 [PMID: 25062019]
  13. J Gen Virol. 2017 Apr;98(4):862-873 [PMID: 28475036]
  14. Viruses. 2021 Apr 30;13(5): [PMID: 33946382]
  15. Adv Virus Res. 2020;106:145-169 [PMID: 32327147]
  16. Virology. 2016 Feb;489:179-91 [PMID: 26765969]
  17. Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 14;13:828639 [PMID: 35498699]
  18. Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Jan;21(1):80-90 [PMID: 26651920]
  19. Mov Ecol. 2013 Dec 23;1(1):14 [PMID: 25709827]
  20. Ecology. 2017 Aug;98(8):2145-2157 [PMID: 28555726]
  21. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 30;14(4):e1006085 [PMID: 29708968]
  22. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 27;285(1881): [PMID: 29925619]
  23. Virus Res. 2017 Sep 15;241:156-162 [PMID: 28392444]
  24. Virus Genes. 2012 Apr;44(2):349-55 [PMID: 22173982]
  25. Environ Int. 2019 Aug;129:423-429 [PMID: 31152983]
  26. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 29;12:685382 [PMID: 34394140]
  27. Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Aug;76(8):2548-2556 [PMID: 32248658]
  28. Arch Virol. 2002;147(1):205-16 [PMID: 11858231]
  29. New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(2):424-33 [PMID: 24975238]
  30. J Virol Methods. 2003 Jun 9;110(1):51-60 [PMID: 12757920]
  31. J Gen Virol. 2000 Nov;81(Pt 11):2791-2795 [PMID: 11038393]
  32. Adv Virus Res. 2018;101:189-250 [PMID: 29908590]
  33. Phytopathology. 2020 Jan;110(1):174-186 [PMID: 31502517]
  34. Mol Plant Pathol. 2022 Nov;23(11):1592-1607 [PMID: 35852033]
  35. Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 11;13:834712 [PMID: 35222343]
  36. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:179-203 [PMID: 20433348]
  37. Phytopathology. 2003 Oct;93(10):1217-22 [PMID: 18944319]
  38. Viruses. 2019 Dec 28;12(1): [PMID: 31905671]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BYDV-PAVvirusWDVinteractionseplantsviruseswheatdifferentiinoculationdwarfinfectionepidemiologyscenariosimpactsequentialparameterstransmissionaccumulationplantstudyleadco-infectiondiseasesyellowgenusvectorsco-infected-competitionco-efficiencyspreadbiologicaltwostagescycleintroductionbenefitinsectdecipheringlongfocusedpartnersonepathosystemHoweverexposednumerousfrequentcanchangecharacteristicsvirus-vector-hostviralBarleyvirus-PAVspecies:respectiveBYDV-PAV:gWDV:commonlyfoundcerealfieldsWheatreportedfieldsurveysalthoughepidemiologicaloutcomesyetstudiedExperimentscarriedevaluatecomparesingle-simultaneousinoculationsinfectaccumulateMoreoverevaluatedagesResultsshowedachieveplant-to-plantefficienciesiiphenotypesrangingantagonismsynergismFinallysharehostnaturestrengthvirus-virusvarieddependingorderarrivalagePreciselyprocesspresencelattersympatryexertsoppositepressureinvolvedlowercontextincreasedpotentialexposurecropsparticipatesbetterunderstandingco-infectionsecologicalinducedAsymmetricbarley-PAVsuccessmediated

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)