Sexual Arousal-Delay Discounting: When Condoms Delay Arousal.

Nioud Mulugeta Gebru, Val Wongsomboon
Author Information
  1. Nioud Mulugeta Gebru: Center for Alcohol and Addictions Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health. ORCID
  2. Val Wongsomboon: Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University. ORCID

Abstract

Sexual arousal plays an important role in condom use decisions. However, combined effects of reduced sexual arousal and delay to achieving arousal on condom use decisions remain understudied. This study used a novel sexual arousal-delay discounting (SADD) task to measure individuals' willingness to use a condom in situations where condom use would (1) delay time to arousal and (2) reduce the level of arousal one could achieve even after the delay (e.g., 5 minutes to reach 50% arousal). In Study 1, U.S. college students (N = 115; M = 18.6) reported their willingness to have sex with a condom in hypothetical scenarios where the condom delayed and reduced their partner's sexual arousal. In Study 2, U.S. college students (N = 208; M = 19.6; 99% ��� 24 years old) completed the same task for two partners-partner perceived as most desirable and partner perceived as least likely to have an STI. In this study, a condom would affect either participants' own or partner's arousal. Study 3 replicated Study 2 using a non-college sample in the U.S. (N = 227; M = 30.5; 84% ��� 25 years old). Across studies, willingness to use a condom decreased as the delay to reduced arousal increased. This effect of SADD was stronger when condoms reduced participants' own (vs. partner's) arousal, whereas comparisons between most desirable and least likely-to-have-STI partners provided mixed findings. Men had higher discounting rates than women across conditions. Greater SADD was associated with lower condom use self-efficacy, providing initial evidence for the task's validity. The role of delayed arousal in condom use and implications are discussed.

References

  1. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Aug;50(6):2717-2728 [PMID: 33483850]
  2. Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):260-3 [PMID: 19429219]
  3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jun 1;123(1-3):15-21 [PMID: 22055012]
  4. PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0261034 [PMID: 35148319]
  5. J Sex Med. 2012 May;9(5):1272-6 [PMID: 22781082]
  6. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;29(6):696-710 [PMID: 32309968]
  7. Sex Res Social Policy. 2023 May 9;:1-10 [PMID: 37363350]
  8. Contraception. 2014 Apr;89(4):264-70 [PMID: 24332430]
  9. Sex Health. 2006 Dec;3(4):255-60 [PMID: 17112437]
  10. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2899-2920 [PMID: 35838897]
  11. PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128641 [PMID: 26017273]
  12. Behav Processes. 2010 Jan;83(1):23-30 [PMID: 19744547]
  13. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105(7):1329-32 [PMID: 25973832]
  14. Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Aug;35(4):473-81 [PMID: 16933107]
  15. AIDS Behav. 2011 Oct;15(7):1328-31 [PMID: 19921418]
  16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:307-329 [PMID: 34358579]
  17. J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1897-904 [PMID: 26279414]
  18. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:641-77 [PMID: 24679180]
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;311:115355 [PMID: 36122527]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43 [PMID: 11599641]
  21. Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Dec;36(6):844-8 [PMID: 17909960]
  22. AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2657-2660 [PMID: 33745099]
  23. Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92 [PMID: 15367080]
  24. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1176-1186 [PMID: 31461131]
  25. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Dec;29(6):711-738 [PMID: 33001694]
  26. AIDS Behav. 2015 Sep;19(9):1655-65 [PMID: 26066395]
  27. J Infect Public Health. 2020 Aug;13(8):1112-1117 [PMID: 32471797]
  28. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Oct;46(7):2131-2144 [PMID: 27473071]
  29. Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Sep;19(9):590-4 [PMID: 18725548]
  30. J Sex Med. 2014 Sep;11(9):2285-91 [PMID: 24787349]
  31. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;16(3):264-74 [PMID: 18540786]
  32. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Mar 16;87(2-3):249-57 [PMID: 17182196]
  33. Sex Health. 2012 Mar;9(1):81-95 [PMID: 22348636]

Grants

  1. F31 AA028751/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. T32 AA007459/NIAAA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Condoms
Young Adult
Adult
Delay Discounting
Adolescent
Sexual Arousal
Sexual Partners
Sexual Behavior
Safe Sex

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0arousalcondomusereduceddelayStudysexualSADDwillingness2USpartner'sSexualroledecisionsstudydiscountingtask1collegestudents6delayed���oldperceiveddesirableleastparticipants'playsimportantHowevercombinedeffectsachievingremainunderstudiedusednovelarousal-delaymeasureindividuals'situationstimereduceleveloneachieveeveneg5 minutesreach50%N = 115M = 18reportedsexhypotheticalscenariosN = 208M = 1999%24 yearscompletedtwopartners-partnerpartnerlikelySTIaffecteither3replicatedusingnon-collegesampleN = 227M = 30584%25 yearsAcrossstudiesdecreasedincreasedeffectstrongercondomsvswhereascomparisonslikely-to-have-STIpartnersprovidedmixedfindingsMenhigherrateswomenacrossconditionsGreaterassociatedlowerself-efficacyprovidinginitialevidencetask'svalidityimplicationsdiscussedArousal-DelayDiscounting:CondomsDelayArousal

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)