Artificial intelligence in surgery: the emergency surgeon's perspective (the ARIES project).

Belinda De Simone, Elie Chouillard, Andrew A Gumbs, Tyler J Loftus, Haytham Kaafarani, Fausto Catena
Author Information
  1. Belinda De Simone: Department of Emergency, Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy and St Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France. ORCID
  2. Elie Chouillard: Department of Emergency, Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy and St Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France.
  3. Andrew A Gumbs: Department of Emergency, Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy and St Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France.
  4. Tyler J Loftus: Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, USA.
  5. Haytham Kaafarani: Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  6. Fausto Catena: Department of Emergency and General Surgery, Level I Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed and implemented in healthcare with the valuable potential to reduce health, social, and economic inequities, help actualize universal health coverage, and improve health outcomes on a global scale. The application of AI in emergency surgery settings could improve clinical practice and operating rooms management by promoting consistent, high-quality decision making while preserving the importance of bedside assessment and human intuition as well as respect for human rights and equitable surgical care, but ethical and legal issues are slowing down surgeons' enthusiasm. Emergency surgeons are aware that prioritizing education, increasing the availability of high AI technologies for emergency and trauma surgery, and funding to support research projects that use AI to provide decision support in the operating room are crucial to create an emergency "intelligent" surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):70-76 [PMID: 29389679]
  2. Int J Med Robot. 2019 Feb;15(1):e1968 [PMID: 30397993]
  3. Visc Med. 2020 Dec;36(6):456-462 [PMID: 33447601]
  4. Healthc Technol Lett. 2019 Nov 13;6(6):154-158 [PMID: 32038849]
  5. J Visc Surg. 2021 Jun;158(3S):S18-S25 [PMID: 33712411]
  6. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jul 1;91(1):93-99 [PMID: 33755641]
  7. World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 26;16(1):50 [PMID: 34565420]
  8. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun;75(3):202-215 [PMID: 35345305]
  9. J Int Med Res. 2021 Mar;49(3):3000605211000157 [PMID: 33771068]
  10. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;14(6): [PMID: 35326674]
  11. Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):e93-e95 [PMID: 33417329]
  12. World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 10;17(1):10 [PMID: 35144645]
  13. JAMA Surg. 2020 Feb 1;155(2):148-158 [PMID: 31825465]
  14. JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):972-973 [PMID: 28813552]
  15. J Integr Bioinform. 2018 May 10;15(3): [PMID: 29746254]
  16. IEEE Access. 2021 Feb 10;9:27262-27277 [PMID: 34786307]
  17. Ann Surg. 2018 Oct;268(4):574-583 [PMID: 30124479]
  18. Minerva Chir. 2019 Jun;74(3):189-194 [PMID: 30484600]
  19. Br J Surg. 2018 Sep;105(10):1234-1243 [PMID: 29923181]
  20. J Med Syst. 2021 Jul 24;45(9):84 [PMID: 34302549]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgeryAIemergencyArtificialhealthIntelligenceimproveoperatingdecisionhumanEmergencysupportARIESprojectdevelopedimplementedhealthcarevaluablepotentialreducesocialeconomicinequitieshelpactualizeuniversalcoverageoutcomesglobalscaleapplicationsettingsclinicalpracticeroomsmanagementpromotingconsistenthigh-qualitymakingpreservingimportancebedsideassessmentintuitionwellrespectrightsequitablesurgicalcareethicallegalissuesslowingsurgeons'enthusiasmsurgeonsawareprioritizingeducationincreasingavailabilityhightechnologiestraumafundingresearchprojectsuseprovideroomcrucialcreate"intelligent"intelligencesurgery:surgeon'sperspectiveAutonomousactionDecision-makingDigitalvisionMachinelearningRobotic

Similar Articles

Cited By