A primary study on rat fetal development and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels under the control of electromagnetic fields.

Sima DastAmooz, Shahzad Tahmasebi Broujeni, Nahid Sarahian
Author Information
  1. Sima DastAmooz: Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
  2. Shahzad Tahmasebi Broujeni: Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Iran.
  3. Nahid Sarahian: Neuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background: In previous researches, electromagnetic fields have been shown to adversely affect the behavior and biology of humans and animals; however, body growth and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels were not evaluated.
Objective: The original investigation aimed to examine whether Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) exposure had adverse effects on spatial learning and motor function in rats and if physical activity could diminish the damaging effects of EMF exposure. In this study, we measured anthropometric measurements and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in pregnant rats' offspring to determine if Wi-Fi EMF also affected their growth. These data we report for the first time in this publication.
Methods: Twenty Albino-Wistar pregnant rats were divided randomly into EMF and control (CON) groups, and after delivery, 12 male fetuses were randomly selected. For assessing the body growth change of offspring beginning at delivery, then at 21 postnatal days, and finally at 56 post-natal days, the crown-rump length of the body was assessed using a digital caliper. Examining BDNF factor levels, an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA kit was taken. Bodyweight was recorded by digital scale.
Results: Outcomes of the anthropometric measurements demonstrated that EMF blocked body growth in rats exposed to EMF. The results of the BDNF test illustrated that the BDNF in the EMF liter group was remarkably decreased compared to the CON group. The results indicate that EMF exposure could affect BDNF levels and harm body growth in pregnant rats' offspring.
Conclusions: The results suggest that EMF exposure could affect BDNF levels and impair body growth in pregnant rats' offspring.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Behav Immun. 2009 Oct;23(7):905-16 [PMID: 19217937]
  2. Brain Res Bull. 2006 Jan 30;68(5):355-60 [PMID: 16377443]
  3. Nat Neurosci. 1998 Oct;1(6):445-50 [PMID: 10196541]
  4. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39358 [PMID: 22768299]
  5. Diabetologia. 2000 Apr;43(4):500-6 [PMID: 10819245]
  6. Exp Neurol. 1995 Feb;131(2):229-38 [PMID: 7534721]
  7. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2009 Jun;128(3):232-8 [PMID: 19018478]
  8. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Sep;25(6):452-6 [PMID: 15300731]
  9. Arch Med Res. 2011 Aug;42(6):482-94 [PMID: 21945389]
  10. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar;118(3):394-9 [PMID: 20064781]
  11. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 03;19(8): [PMID: 30081509]
  12. Diabetes. 2006 Dec;55(12):3366-71 [PMID: 17130481]
  13. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015 Jul;91(7):555-61 [PMID: 25775055]
  14. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):57-66 [PMID: 9453708]
  15. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):75-8 [PMID: 23781992]
  16. Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 7;11(1):1729 [PMID: 32265438]
  17. Neurochem Res. 1997 Apr;22(4):507-15 [PMID: 9130263]
  18. Nat Med. 2012 Mar 18;18(4):564-71 [PMID: 22426422]
  19. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2004 Jul;25(2):77-107 [PMID: 15571756]
  20. J Neurobiol. 1994 Nov;25(11):1386-403 [PMID: 7852993]
  21. Clin Perinatol. 2014 Dec;41(4):815-31 [PMID: 25459776]
  22. Acta Physiol Hung. 2009 Dec;96(4):437-48 [PMID: 19942550]
  23. Hippocampus. 1994 Dec;4(6):623-34 [PMID: 7704107]
  24. Magn Reson Med. 2006 Apr;55(4):883-93 [PMID: 16508913]
  25. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2006 Jul;113(7):821-7 [PMID: 16252069]
  26. J Radiat Res. 2020 Mar 23;61(2):197-206 [PMID: 31927574]
  27. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201417 [PMID: 32207831]
  28. Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Jul 29;77(5):960-963 [PMID: 10062950]
  29. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e88921 [PMID: 24586442]
  30. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009 Dec;30(8):678-86 [PMID: 19644978]
  31. Int J Neurosci. 2018 Aug;128(8):691-696 [PMID: 29185809]
  32. Front Neurosci. 2013 Mar 21;7:37 [PMID: 23519010]
  33. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Dec;350(1-2):1-16 [PMID: 15530455]
  34. J Obes. 2019 Nov 3;2019:4537274 [PMID: 31781387]
  35. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2018 Dec;71:10-17 [PMID: 30076989]
  36. Placenta. 2010 Sep;31(9):785-91 [PMID: 20615547]
  37. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Mar 1;240:197-201 [PMID: 23195115]
  38. Neuroscience. 2006;139(3):1107-15 [PMID: 16564638]
  39. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;31(3):278-283 [PMID: 28081639]
  40. Radiat Res. 2010 Mar;173(3):362-72 [PMID: 20199221]
  41. Endocrinology. 2005 Dec;146(12):5612-20 [PMID: 16166223]
  42. J Cell Physiol. 2005 Aug;204(2):532-8 [PMID: 15754325]
  43. Exp Neurol. 2011 Mar;228(1):118-25 [PMID: 21192928]
  44. Dev Biol. 2007 Nov 1;311(1):147-58 [PMID: 17880937]
  45. Pflugers Arch. 2017 Jun;469(5-6):593-610 [PMID: 28280960]
  46. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 May;24(4):262-76 [PMID: 12696086]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EMFBDNFbodygrowthlevelsfactoroffspringexposurepregnantelectromagneticfieldsaffectbrain-derivedneurotrophicratsanthropometricmeasurementsrats'resultseffectsstudyrandomlycontrolCONdeliverymaledayscrown-rumplengthdigitalgroupBackground:previousresearchesshownadverselybehaviorbiologyhumansanimalshoweverevaluatedObjective:originalinvestigationaimedexaminewhetherElectromagneticFieldsadversespatiallearningmotorfunctionphysicalactivitydiminishdamagingmeasureddetermineWi-FialsoaffecteddatareportfirsttimepublicationMethods:TwentyAlbino-Wistardividedgroups12fetusesselectedassessingchangebeginning21postnatalfinally56post-natalassessedusingcaliperExaminingEnzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassayELISAkittakenBodyweightrecordedscaleResults:OutcomesdemonstratedblockedexposedtestillustratedliterremarkablydecreasedcomparedindicateharmConclusions:suggestimpairprimaryratfetaldevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By