Effects of drying on the nutritional, sensory and microbiological quality of edible stinkbug .

Melania Dandadzi, Robert Musundire, Alice Muriithi, Ruth T Ngadze
Author Information
  1. Melania Dandadzi: School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya.
  2. Robert Musundire: Research and Postgraduate Studies, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.
  3. Alice Muriithi: School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya.
  4. Ruth T Ngadze: Department of Food Science and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. O Box 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.

Abstract

Entomophagy has recently gained attention as a potential solution to the problems of food and nutritional security. One example is the consumption of edible stinkbug. Different drying techniques may affect the nutritional, microbiological and sensory properties of the edible stinkbugs. Thus, the study assessed the effects of toasting, microwave, oven and sun drying on the nutritional composition, microbiological quality and sensory attributes of processed edible stinkbugs. Drying significantly (p < 0.05) increased the crude protein and fat content of the edible stink bugs with the highest values being recorded for the toasted samples (66.65 & 37.17% respectively). Highest Ca, K, Zn, Mg, Fe and P values were recorded after microwave drying. Reduction of 2.94 and 2.99 log cycles of the total viable count (TVC) was observed in oven and microwave dried edible stinkbugs. Toasting and microwave drying eliminated the yeasts and moulds, and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in edible stinkbugs. The appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall acceptability scores were in the same order for toasted > oven dried > microwave dried > sun dried edible stinkbugs. Toasting, oven and microwave drying can be used for processing of edible stinkbugs.

Keywords

References

  1. Food Res Int. 2020 Mar;129:108831 [PMID: 32036901]
  2. Food Microbiol. 2018 Apr;70:181-191 [PMID: 29173626]
  3. Front Microbiol. 2020 May 25;11:884 [PMID: 32523562]
  4. Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:503-508 [PMID: 29579954]
  5. Food Chem. 2019 Dec 15;301:125305 [PMID: 31387042]
  6. BMC Med. 2020 Feb 27;18(1):31 [PMID: 32102669]
  7. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 05;11(1):e0145914 [PMID: 26731419]
  8. J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 26;14:14 [PMID: 25373161]
  9. Insects. 2019 Mar 27;10(4): [PMID: 30934687]
  10. Int J Food Sci. 2016;2016:7879097 [PMID: 27034924]
  11. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-83 [PMID: 23020616]
  12. Foods. 2020 May 04;9(5): [PMID: 32375385]
  13. Meat Sci. 2004 Jan;66(1):33-43 [PMID: 22063929]
  14. Food Sci Technol Int. 2017 Jan;23(1):17-23 [PMID: 27235993]
  15. Insects. 2017 Sep 16;8(3): [PMID: 28926949]
  16. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2021 Dec;48:32-36 [PMID: 34455091]
  17. Insects. 2021 Apr 08;12(4): [PMID: 33917808]
  18. Insects. 2017 Jan 13;8(1): [PMID: 28098752]
  19. Front Nutr. 2020 Jul 10;7:89 [PMID: 32754611]
  20. Food Chem. 2015 Apr 15;173:682-4 [PMID: 25466076]
  21. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Mar 25;9:20 [PMID: 23531129]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0edibledryingstinkbugsmicrowavenutritionalmicrobiologicalsensoryovenqualityToastingstinkbugvaluesrecorded2driedEntomophagyrecentlygainedattentionpotentialsolutionproblemsfoodsecurityOneexampleconsumptionDifferenttechniquesmayaffectpropertiesThusstudyassessedeffectstoastingsuncompositionattributesprocessedDryingsignificantlyp < 005increasedcrudeproteinfatcontentstinkbugshighesttoastedsamples6665&3717%respectivelyHighestCaKZnMgFePReduction9499logcyclestotalviablecountTVCobservedeliminatedyeastsmouldslacticacidbacteriaLABappearancearomatastetextureoverallacceptabilityscoresordertoasted > ovendried > microwavedried > suncanusedprocessingEffectsEncosternumdelgorgueiMicrobiologicalMicrowaveOven

Similar Articles

Cited By