Low Vision Services Provision throughout NHS Trusts in the UK.

Charlotte Joy Codina, Martin Rhodes
Author Information
  1. Charlotte Joy Codina: University of Sheffield, UK. ORCID
  2. Martin Rhodes: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Background/Aims: The aim of this study was to understand the picture of low vision service provision within NHS Trusts in the United Kingdom, for children and adults.
Method: A survey was distributed to all members of the British and Irish Orthoptic Society (BIOS) and to all Eye Clinic Liaison Officers (ECLOs) through the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB). The survey was also directly emailed to Orthoptic contacts of all 238 Trusts/Health Boards, which covered the four nations of the United Kingdom. The survey asked whether their Trust had a clinical low vision service, which professions were involved in leading and working within it, where it was based, and whether provision was offered to children, adults, or both.
Results: In the United Kingdom (UK), 117 out of 238 (49%) Trusts responded. Of these responders, 94% had a level of Trust-delivered low vision service provision; 90% had services for adults; 83% had services for children; and 79% had services for both adults and children. Service accessibility for patients of all ages had regional and national variation.
Conclusion: Significant variation was found in low vision service provision throughout the UK, with some regions having no NHS-delivered provision for either children, adults, or both. This calls for further research to gain a more comprehensive understanding of low vision service provision and remove inequalities in provision, access and resourcing, aiming to ensure equitable access for all.

Keywords

References

  1. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jan;93(1):77-84 [PMID: 26583792]
  2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jul;86(7):743-7 [PMID: 12084742]
  3. J Optom. 2021 Oct-Dec;14(4):335-341 [PMID: 33067164]
  4. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 25;11(9): [PMID: 35566537]
  5. Clin Exp Optom. 2014 May;97(3):209-13 [PMID: 24766508]
  6. Eye (Lond). 2011 Jul;25(7):829-31 [PMID: 21753802]
  7. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 May;126(5):608-17 [PMID: 18474769]
  8. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jan;19(1):149-54 [PMID: 21951976]
  9. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 29;5(1):e000587 [PMID: 33437871]
  10. World J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;10(6):139-149 [PMID: 32742947]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0provisionvisionlowservicechildrenadultsNHSTrustsUnitedKingdomsurveyUKserviceswithinOrthoptic238whethervariationthroughoutaccessLowVisionBackground/Aims:aimstudyunderstandpictureMethod:distributedmembersBritishIrishSocietyBIOSEyeClinicLiaisonOfficersECLOsRoyalNationalInstituteBlindRNIBalsodirectlyemailedcontactsTrusts/HealthBoardscoveredfournationsaskedTrustclinicalprofessionsinvolvedleadingworkingbasedofferedbothResults:11749%respondedresponders94%levelTrust-delivered90%83%79%ServiceaccessibilitypatientsagesregionalnationalConclusion:SignificantfoundregionsNHS-deliveredeithercallsresearchgaincomprehensiveunderstandingremoveinequalitiesresourcingaimingensureequitableallServicesProvisionInequalityworkforcerehabilitationimpaired

Similar Articles

Cited By