The cultural evolution of teaching.

Eva Brandl, Ruth Mace, Cecilia Heyes
Author Information
  1. Eva Brandl: Lise Meitner Research Group BirthRites, Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany. ORCID
  2. Ruth Mace: Department of Anthropology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. ORCID
  3. Cecilia Heyes: All Souls College and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4AL, UK.

Abstract

Teaching is an important process of cultural transmission. Some have argued that human teaching is a cognitive instinct - a form of 'natural cognition' centred on mindreading, shaped by genetic evolution for the education of juveniles, and with a normative developmental trajectory driven by the unfolding of a genetically inherited predisposition to teach. Here, we argue instead that human teaching is a culturally evolved trait that exhibits characteristics of a cognitive gadget. Children learn to teach by participating in teaching interactions with socialising agents, which shape their own teaching practices. This process hijacks psychological mechanisms involved in prosociality and a range of domain-general cognitive abilities, such as reinforcement learning and executive function, but not a suite of cognitive adaptations specifically for teaching. Four lines of evidence converge on this hypothesis. The first, based on psychological experiments in industrialised societies, indicates that domain-general cognitive processes are important for teaching. The second and third lines, based on naturalistic and experimental research in small-scale societies, indicate marked cross-cultural variation in mature teaching practice and in the ontogeny of teaching among children. The fourth line indicates that teaching has been subject to cumulative cultural evolution, i.e. the gradual accumulation of functional changes across generations.

Keywords

References

  1. Child Dev. 2019 May;90(3):759-773 [PMID: 29094348]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;20(3):204-213 [PMID: 26778808]
  3. Hum Nat. 2007 Dec;18(4):386-402 [PMID: 26181314]
  4. J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):2904-13 [PMID: 25698730]
  5. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;150:87-98 [PMID: 27268158]
  6. Hum Nat. 2018 Jun;29(2):157-185 [PMID: 29713872]
  7. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604 [PMID: 10940436]
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2181-91 [PMID: 22734061]
  9. Rev Philos Psychol. 2018;9(4):751-770 [PMID: 30595765]
  10. Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;1:119-147 [PMID: 38250669]
  11. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Mar;148(3):520-549 [PMID: 30802127]
  12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Sep;23(9):486-93 [PMID: 18657877]
  13. Child Dev. 2016 May;87(3):633-42 [PMID: 27189392]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20201885 [PMID: 33203332]
  15. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e31 [PMID: 24856634]
  16. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1237-56 [PMID: 18826523]
  17. Hum Nat. 2017 Sep;28(3):289-322 [PMID: 28567606]
  18. J Hum Evol. 2012 Jul;63(1):180-90 [PMID: 22658335]
  19. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 May 5;371(1693): [PMID: 27069046]
  20. Evol Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;39(1):94-105 [PMID: 34650327]
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):148-53 [PMID: 19285912]
  22. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e48 [PMID: 26786861]
  23. Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1243091 [PMID: 24948740]
  24. Q Rev Biol. 1992 Jun;67(2):151-74 [PMID: 1635977]
  25. Child Dev. 2021 Jan;92(1):e56-e75 [PMID: 32776521]
  26. Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 13;6:6029 [PMID: 25585382]
  27. Behav Ecol. 2011 Jul;22(4):745-754 [PMID: 22479136]
  28. Dev Psychol. 2002 Jan;38(1):55-66 [PMID: 11806702]
  29. Science. 1969 Sep 12;165(3898):1144-6 [PMID: 5801599]
  30. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Dec;95(4):298-308 [PMID: 17030037]
  31. Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;54(11):2113-2125 [PMID: 30265027]
  32. Dev Psychol. 2018 Mar;54(3):536-542 [PMID: 29083212]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 28;104(35):13861-7 [PMID: 17717081]
  34. Child Dev. 2023 Nov-Dec;94(6):1713-1729 [PMID: 37315123]
  35. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150069 [PMID: 26644604]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):969-976 [PMID: 31871167]
  37. Front Psychol. 2017 May 16;8:725 [PMID: 28559863]
  38. Proc Biol Sci. 2022 May 11;289(1974):20220164 [PMID: 35538787]
  39. Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:91-106 [PMID: 28341268]
  40. Science. 2006 Jul 14;313(5784):227-9 [PMID: 16840701]
  41. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1168-78 [PMID: 21357239]
  42. Evolution. 2011 Oct;65(10):2760-70 [PMID: 21967419]
  43. Science. 1973 Nov 9;182(4112):553-9 [PMID: 17739714]
  44. Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):e148-e164 [PMID: 29635785]
  45. Child Dev. 2002 May-Jun;73(3):969-82 [PMID: 12038563]
  46. Hum Nat. 2013 Dec;24(4):351-74 [PMID: 24096923]
  47. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 31;7(1):14394 [PMID: 29089534]
  48. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):12-38 [PMID: 37439763]
  49. Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):153 [PMID: 16407943]
  50. Infancy. 2012 Nov;17(6):672-691 [PMID: 32693489]
  51. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e42 [PMID: 26786271]
  52. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 29;8(8):e72667 [PMID: 24009696]
  53. J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):320-31 [PMID: 17696658]
  54. Dev Sci. 2012 Jan;15(1):113-22 [PMID: 22251297]
  55. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1149-57 [PMID: 21357237]
  56. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):144-152 [PMID: 31611659]
  57. Int J Primatol. 2018;39(6):1105-1123 [PMID: 30613117]
  58. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7877-7883 [PMID: 28739945]
  59. Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e67 [PMID: 26785757]
  60. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 11;6:34783 [PMID: 27725706]
  61. R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 20;3(1):150403 [PMID: 26909166]
  62. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 31;9(1):11080 [PMID: 31367002]
  63. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):225-231 [PMID: 27368625]
  64. Dev Psychobiol. 2008 Jul;50(5):460-72 [PMID: 18551463]
  65. Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):792-806 [PMID: 35913535]
  66. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Mar;143:111-22 [PMID: 26683654]
  67. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 20;375(1803):20190500 [PMID: 32475325]
  68. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2369-80 [PMID: 19620108]
  69. J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Sep;209:105175 [PMID: 34000589]
  70. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):280-95 [PMID: 26993279]
  71. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191071 [PMID: 29351319]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0teachingcognitiveevolutionculturalimportantprocesshumanteachpsychologicaldomain-generallearninglinesbasedsocietiesindicatesTeachingtransmissionarguedinstinct-form'naturalcognition'centredmindreadingshapedgeneticeducationjuvenilesnormativedevelopmentaltrajectorydrivenunfoldinggeneticallyinheritedpredispositionargueinsteadculturallyevolvedtraitexhibitscharacteristicsgadgetChildrenlearnparticipatinginteractionssocialisingagentsshapepracticeshijacksmechanismsinvolvedprosocialityrangeabilitiesreinforcementexecutivefunctionsuiteadaptationsspecificallyFourevidenceconvergehypothesisfirstexperimentsindustrialisedprocessessecondthirdnaturalisticexperimentalresearchsmall-scaleindicatemarkedcross-culturalvariationmaturepracticeontogenyamongchildrenfourthlinesubjectcumulativeiegradualaccumulationfunctionalchangesacrossgenerationsCulturalgadgetssocial

Similar Articles

Cited By