Primary care physicians' strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

Tasmiah Nuzhath, Abigail Spiegelman, Julia Scobee, Kirby Goidel, David Washburn, Timothy Callaghan
Author Information
  1. Tasmiah Nuzhath: Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University. 212 Adriance Lab Rd. 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: nuz_t@tamu.edu.
  2. Abigail Spiegelman: Rutland Regional Medical Center, 160 Allen St, Rutland, VT, USA.
  3. Julia Scobee: Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. Kirby Goidel: Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, 2935, Research Pkwy, College Station, TX, USA.
  5. David Washburn: Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, USA.
  6. Timothy Callaghan: Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the strategies that primary care physicians use to address patient COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.
METHOD: We administered an online survey to 625 primary care physicians from May 14 to May 25, 2021, to assess the messages that primary care physicians use to encourage hesitant patients to get vaccinated against COVID-19.589 physicians from the total pool of 625 provided open-ended responses. We conducted thematic content analysis on the responses based on previous research and themes identified within the data.
SETTING: The survey was administered online using the survey research firm Dynata.
RESULTS: Eleven primary themes emerged from our analysis, which included, physicians addressing specific concerns about vaccine safety (including costs versus benefits), physicians helping patients understand what it means to remain unvaccinated, or whether physicians try to connect emotionally through the use of guilt, or personal experience, whether physicians use derisive language to communicate with unvaccinated patients. In addition, a small number of physicians indicated they would not attempt to persuade someone who is vaccine hesitant.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that while some of the physicians used different strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, some of the physicians used harsh language or did not make any effort to reduce COVID-19 related vaccine hesitancy among their patients. Focused advocacy and training are needed to increase physician engagement in vaccine-related dialogues with their patients. Such efforts will ensure that critical opportunities for patient education and awareness-building are not missed and ensure high levels of vaccination uptake.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19 Vaccines
COVID-19
Physicians, Primary Care
Guilt
Language

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0physiciansvaccineCOVID-19hesitancypatientsprimarycareusestrategiessurveyaddresspatientadministeredonline625MayhesitantresponsesanalysisresearchthemesaddressingunvaccinatedwhetherlanguageusedensureOBJECTIVE:exploreMETHOD:14252021assessmessagesencouragegetvaccinated589totalpoolprovidedopen-endedconductedthematiccontentbasedpreviousidentifiedwithindataSETTING:usingfirmDynataRESULTS:ElevenemergedincludedspecificconcernssafetyincludingcostsversusbenefitshelpingunderstandmeansremaintryconnectemotionallyguiltpersonalexperiencederisivecommunicateadditionsmallnumberindicatedattemptpersuadesomeoneCONCLUSIONS:studyshowsdifferentharshmakeeffortreducerelatedamongFocusedadvocacytrainingneededincreasephysicianengagementvaccine-relateddialogueseffortswillcriticalopportunitieseducationawareness-buildingmissedhighlevelsvaccinationuptakePrimaryphysicians'CommunicationPhysicianRhetoricSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccine

Similar Articles

Cited By