Analysis of risk factors for complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Jing-Nan Fu, Shu-Chang Liu, Yi Chen, Jie Zhao, Tao Ma
Author Information
  1. Jing-Nan Fu: Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Characteristics Medical Center of Chinese People Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
  2. Shu-Chang Liu: Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  3. Yi Chen: Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  4. Jie Zhao: Department of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  5. Tao Ma: Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Abstract

To analyze the risk factors of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 478 patients in our hospital.
METHODS: The clinical data of 478 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our hospital from March 2018 to September 2022 were collected, and the occurrence of postoperative complications and related risk factors were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (7.53%) had complications, including 9 cases (1.88%) of abdominal hemorrhage, 8 cases (1.67%) of bile duct injury, and 19 cases (3.97%) of biliary fistula. Univariate analysis showed that adhesions of Calot triangle, anatomical variation and gallbladder wall thickness greater than 5 mm were associated with postoperative complications (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that: Calot triangle adhesion (OR = 3.041, 95%CI = 1.422-6.507), anatomical variation (OR = 4.368, 95%CI = 1.764-10.813) and gallbladder wall thickening (OR = 2.827, 95%CI = 1.422-6.507). 95%CI = 1.274-6.275) were independent risk factors for complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, the risk factors of LC should be well understood and the preoperative preparation should be made.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 29;10:998106 [PMID: 36105859]
  2. Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:164-172 [PMID: 30439536]
  3. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3093-3101 [PMID: 34017477]
  4. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Jan;13(1):1-14 [PMID: 21159098]
  5. Cir Cir. 2021;89(3):390-393 [PMID: 34037609]
  6. Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6403-6409 [PMID: 35024925]
  7. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Sep;20(9):786-794 [PMID: 29650299]
  8. Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;99(2):245-258 [PMID: 30846033]
  9. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 May;32(5):476-484 [PMID: 34314632]
  10. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Feb 28;117(9):148-158 [PMID: 32234195]
  11. Cureus. 2020 Jul 10;12(7):e9113 [PMID: 32670732]
  12. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022;(12):104-108 [PMID: 36469476]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0complicationsfactorsriskcholecystectomylaparoscopic95%CI = 1patientspostoperativecases478hospitaloccurrence1analysisshowedCalottriangleanatomicalvariationgallbladderwallP < 005422-6507analyzeMETHODS:clinicaldataunderwentMarch2018September2022collectedrelatedanalyzedRESULTS:total36753%including988%abdominalhemorrhage867%bileductinjury19397%biliaryfistulaUnivariateadhesionsthicknessgreater5 mmassociatedMultivariatethat:adhesionOR = 3041OR = 4368764-10813thickeningOR = 2827274-6275independentCONCLUSION:orderreduceLCwellunderstoodpreoperativepreparationmadeAnalysisComplicationLaparoscopicRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By