Morphological changes in female reproductive organs in the African monarch butterfly, host to a male-killing .

Jenny Malmberg, Simon H Martin, Ian J Gordon, Pasi Sihvonen, Anne Duplouy
Author Information
  1. Jenny Malmberg: Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  2. Simon H Martin: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, The University of Edinburg, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburg, UK. ORCID
  3. Ian J Gordon: Centre of Excellence in Biodiversity and Natural Resource Management, Huye Campus, Huye, Rwanda.
  4. Pasi Sihvonen: Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ORCID
  5. Anne Duplouy: Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Sexual selection and conflicts within and between sexes promote morphological diversity of reproductive traits within species. Variation in the morphology of diagnostic reproductive characters within species offer an excellent opportunity to study these evolutionary processes as drivers of species diversification. The African monarch, (Linnaeus, 1758), is widespread across Africa. The species is polytypic, with the respective geographical ranges of the four colour morphs only overlapping in East Africa. Furthermore, some of the populations host an endosymbiotic bacterium, , which induces son-killing and distorts the local host population sex-ratio, creating sexual conflicts between the females seeking to optimize their fecundity and the limited mating capacity of the rare males.
Methods: We dissected females from Kenya, Rwanda and South Africa, where vary in presence and prevalence (high, variable and absent, respectively), and conducted microscopy imaging of their reproductive organs. We then characterized the effect of population, female body size, and female mating status, on the size and shape of different genitalia characters of the female butterflies.
Results: We showed that although the general morphology of the organs is conserved in , female genitalia vary in size and shape between and within populations. The virgin females have smaller organs, while the same organs were expanded in mated females. Females from highly female-biased populations, where the male-killing is prevalent, also have a larger area of their bursae covered with signa structures. However, this pattern occurs because a larger proportion of the females remains virgin in the female-biased populations rather than because of male depletion due to the symbiont, as males from sex-ratio distorted populations did not produce significantly smaller nutritious spermatophores.

Keywords

References

  1. Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Mar;88(3):166-71 [PMID: 11920117]
  2. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):181 [PMID: 34563127]
  3. Genetics. 2000 Oct;156(2):699-709 [PMID: 11014817]
  4. PeerJ. 2021 Nov 22;9:e12499 [PMID: 34900425]
  5. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 22;7:43095 [PMID: 28225037]
  6. Insects. 2019 Sep 09;10(9): [PMID: 31505824]
  7. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9 [PMID: 7881515]
  8. Biotechniques. 2007 Jul;43(1 Suppl):25-30 [PMID: 17936939]
  9. J Morphol. 1984 Jun;180(3):213-221 [PMID: 30041511]
  10. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 27;283(1835): [PMID: 27440667]
  11. Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):735-742 [PMID: 28555827]
  12. J Theor Biol. 2005 Feb 7;232(3):443-9 [PMID: 15572067]
  13. Nature. 2000 Oct 19;407(6806):855-6 [PMID: 11057654]
  14. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 May 12;366(1569):1389-400 [PMID: 21444313]
  15. Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):741-51 [PMID: 27600556]
  16. BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Mar 24;9:64 [PMID: 19317891]
  17. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jul 01;7(7):a017749 [PMID: 26134314]
  18. PLoS Biol. 2020 Feb 27;18(2):e3000610 [PMID: 32108180]
  19. Genetics. 2002 Mar;160(3):1075-86 [PMID: 11901123]
  20. Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 19;16(24):2453-8 [PMID: 17174921]
  21. Curr Biol. 2001 Apr 3;11(7):489-93 [PMID: 11412998]
  22. Evolution. 2002 May;56(5):936-47 [PMID: 12093029]
  23. Mol Ecol. 2005 Oct;14(11):3525-30 [PMID: 16156820]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 3;114(27):E5406-E5413 [PMID: 28630352]
  25. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 7;270(1514):447-55 [PMID: 12641898]
  26. J Evol Biol. 2010 Jan;23(1):231-5 [PMID: 19912450]
  27. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Sep;162:107198 [PMID: 33989807]
  28. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2013 May;42(3):247-56 [PMID: 23396268]
  29. Insect Sci. 2018 Apr;25(2):284-296 [PMID: 27882649]
  30. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 7;270(1528):2065-71 [PMID: 14561296]
  31. PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63807 [PMID: 23717488]
  32. Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 6;17(3):273-7 [PMID: 17276921]
  33. BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Oct 15;12:204 [PMID: 23061984]
  34. Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 15;19(17):1442-6 [PMID: 19664925]
  35. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):69-73 [PMID: 10670955]
  36. Evolution. 2004 Oct;58(10):2382-6 [PMID: 15562699]
  37. Zootaxa. 2019 Aug 19;4657(2):zootaxa.4657.2.11 [PMID: 31716792]
  38. Insects. 2022 Aug 08;13(8): [PMID: 36005339]
  39. Biol Lett. 2022 Jun;18(6):20210639 [PMID: 35642381]
  40. J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):685-95 [PMID: 17305834]
  41. Evolution. 1993 Aug;47(4):1203-1212 [PMID: 28564284]
  42. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5 [PMID: 22930834]
  43. PLoS Biol. 2023 Jan 23;21(1):e3001972 [PMID: 36689552]
  44. Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 16;25(22):2980-4 [PMID: 26549254]
  45. Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 12;10(19):10851-10857 [PMID: 33072300]
  46. Parasitology. 2000 May;120 ( Pt 5):439-46 [PMID: 10840973]
  47. Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr 02;13(4):e9956 [PMID: 37021082]
  48. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000 Jul-Aug;6(4):329-36 [PMID: 10905965]
  49. PeerJ. 2014 Jan 30;2:e247 [PMID: 24498577]

MeSH Term

Female
Male
Animals
Butterflies
Genitalia
Reproduction
Fertility
Kenya

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0populationsfemalesorgansfemalewithinreproductivespeciesAfricahostsizeconflictsmorphologycharactersAfricanmonarchpopulationsex-ratiomatingmalesvaryshapegenitaliavirginsmallerfemale-biasedmale-killinglargerBackground:SexualselectionsexespromotemorphologicaldiversitytraitsVariationdiagnosticofferexcellentopportunitystudyevolutionaryprocessesdriversdiversificationLinnaeus1758widespreadacrosspolytypicrespectivegeographicalrangesfourcolourmorphsoverlappingEastFurthermoreendosymbioticbacteriuminducesson-killingdistortslocalcreatingsexualseekingoptimizefecunditylimitedcapacityrareMethods:dissectedKenyaRwandaSouthpresenceprevalencehighvariableabsentrespectivelyconductedmicroscopyimagingcharacterizedeffectbodystatusdifferentbutterfliesResults:showedalthoughgeneralconservedexpandedmatedFemaleshighlyprevalentalsoareabursaecoveredsignastructuresHoweverpatternoccursproportionremainsrathermaledepletionduesymbiontdistortedproducesignificantlynutritiousspermatophoresMorphologicalchangesbutterflyBacterialsymbiosisCorpusbursaNuptialgiftSex-ratiodistortionSignum

Similar Articles

Cited By