Up-regulated serum lactate dehydrogenase could become a poor prognostic marker in patients with bladder cancer by an evidence-based analysis of 2,182 patients.

Xiaoyu Wei, Yumeng Chai, Zhouyue Li, Xuanyan Che, Yong Zhang, Zhongbao Zhou, Xiang Wang
Author Information
  1. Xiaoyu Wei: Department of Oncology, Tianjin Binhai New Area Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  2. Yumeng Chai: Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  3. Zhouyue Li: Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  4. Xuanyan Che: Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  5. Yong Zhang: Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  6. Zhongbao Zhou: Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  7. Xiang Wang: Department of Urology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: A growing number of studies have considered serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as an indicator of bladder cancer (BC) prognosis. However, a meta-analysis of the serum LDH's influence on BC prognosis is still missing.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were exhaustively searched for studies comparing oncological outcomes between high-LDH and low-LDH patients. Standard cumulative analyses using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using Review Manager (version 5.3) for overall survival (OS) in patients with BC.
Results: Six studies involving 2,182 patients were selected according to predefined eligibility criteria. The results showed that serum LDH level was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.54-2.25, p<0.0001) in BC. Sensitivity analysis showed the stability of the results. Subgroup analysis revealed that the levels of serum LDH had a significant impact on the OS of BC patients among different groups including publication time, research country, sample size, tumor stage, LDH cut-off value, therapy and follow-up time (all HR>1 and p<0.05), revealing that the ability of serum LDH is not affected by other factors.
Conclusion: Our findings indicated that a high level of serum LDH was associated with inferior OS in patients with BC. However, caution must be taken before recommendations are given because this interpretation is based upon very few clinical studies and a small sample.

Keywords

References

  1. Cell. 2008 Sep 5;134(5):703-7 [PMID: 18775299]
  2. Cell Rep Med. 2022 Nov 15;3(11):100785 [PMID: 36265483]
  3. Immunol Rev. 2020 May;295(1):187-202 [PMID: 32157706]
  4. Urology. 2002 Feb;59(2):232-8; discussion 238-9 [PMID: 11834392]
  5. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Dec;5(6):628-639 [PMID: 36333236]
  6. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):341-345.e3 [PMID: 26868330]
  7. Cancer Res. 1995 Sep 15;55(18):4151-6 [PMID: 7664293]
  8. Urol Oncol. 2017 Jul;35(7):457.e15-457.e21 [PMID: 28110856]
  9. Science. 1956 Feb 24;123(3191):309-14 [PMID: 13298683]
  10. Radiother Oncol. 1993 May;27(2):117-22 [PMID: 8356221]
  11. Theranostics. 2021 Jan 1;11(7):3089-3108 [PMID: 33537076]
  12. Cancer Lett. 2015 Mar 1;358(1):1-7 [PMID: 25528630]
  13. Cancer Biomark. 2017 Jul 4;19(4):353-363 [PMID: 28582845]
  14. BMC Med. 2021 Nov 26;19(1):289 [PMID: 34836536]
  15. Front Oncol. 2020 May 20;10:677 [PMID: 32509573]
  16. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Nov;4(11):891-9 [PMID: 15516961]
  17. Clin Chem. 1967 Mar;13(3):196-203 [PMID: 6018717]
  18. Health Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;6(1):e996 [PMID: 36570342]
  19. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Mar;10(8):e2207155 [PMID: 36642843]
  20. Stat Med. 2002 Nov 30;21(22):3337-51 [PMID: 12407676]
  21. BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008 [PMID: 28935701]
  22. Urol Oncol. 2020 Nov;38(11):852.e1-852.e9 [PMID: 32624424]
  23. BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):65 [PMID: 37098538]
  24. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1275-81 [PMID: 23123368]
  25. World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):296-304 [PMID: 16518661]
  26. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;17(19):6250-6261 [PMID: 21844011]
  27. Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906 [PMID: 33789826]
  28. Stat Med. 1998 Dec 30;17(24):2815-34 [PMID: 9921604]
  29. Future Med Chem. 2016 Apr;8(6):713-25 [PMID: 27054686]
  30. JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1980-1991 [PMID: 33201207]
  31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94 [PMID: 21195583]
  32. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e1048-e1053 [PMID: 31303560]