Tightening the requirements for species diagnoses would help integrate DNA-based descriptions in taxonomic practice.

Frank E Rheindt, Patrice Bouchard, Richard L Pyle, Francisco Welter-Schultes, Erna Aescht, Shane T Ahyong, Alberto Ballerio, Thierry Bourgoin, Luis M P Ceríaco, Dmitry Dmitriev, Neal Evenhuis, Mark J Grygier, Mark S Harvey, Maurice Kottelat, Nikita Kluge, Frank-T Krell, Jun-Ichi Kojima, Sven O Kullander, Paulo Lucinda, Christopher H C Lyal, Cristina Luisa Scioscia, Daniel Whitmore, Douglas Yanega, Zhi-Qiang Zhang, Hong-Zhang Zhou, Thomas Pape
Author Information
  1. Frank E Rheindt: National University of Singapore, Department of Biological Sciences, Singapore. ORCID
  2. Patrice Bouchard: Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Richard L Pyle: Department of Natural Sciences, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
  4. Francisco Welter-Schultes: Abteilung Evolution und Biodiversität der Tiere und Zoologisches Museum, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Erna Aescht: Biology Centre of the Upper Austrian Museum, Linz, Austria.
  6. Shane T Ahyong: Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia.
  7. Alberto Ballerio: Independent Researcher, Brescia, Italy.
  8. Thierry Bourgoin: Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), MNHN-CNRS-Sorbonne Université-EPHE- Université des Antilles, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
  9. Luis M P Ceríaco: Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  10. Dmitry Dmitriev: Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
  11. Neal Evenhuis: Department of Natural Sciences, Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
  12. Mark J Grygier: National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Checheng, Taiwan.
  13. Mark S Harvey: Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool DC, Australia.
  14. Maurice Kottelat: Independent Researcher, Delémont, Switzerland.
  15. Nikita Kluge: Department of Entomology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  16. Frank-T Krell: Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
  17. Jun-Ichi Kojima: Natural History Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, Mito, Japan.
  18. Sven O Kullander: Department of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
  19. Paulo Lucinda: Laboratório de Ictiologia Sistemática, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Tocantins, Brazil.
  20. Christopher H C Lyal: Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
  21. Cristina Luisa Scioscia: Arachnology Division, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 'Bernardino Rivadavia', Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  22. Daniel Whitmore: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  23. Douglas Yanega: Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.
  24. Zhi-Qiang Zhang: Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
  25. Hong-Zhang Zhou: Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  26. Thomas Pape: Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. ORCID

Abstract

Modern advances in DNA sequencing hold the promise of facilitating descriptions of new organisms at ever finer precision but have come with challenges as the major Codes of bionomenclature contain poorly defined requirements for species and subspecies diagnoses (henceforth, species diagnoses), which is particularly problematic for DNA-based taxonomy. We, the commissioners of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, advocate a tightening of the definition of "species diagnosis" in future editions of Codes of bionomenclature, for example, through the introduction of requirements for specific information on the character states of differentiating traits in comparison with similar species. Such new provisions would enhance taxonomic standards and ensure that all diagnoses, including DNA-based ones, contain adequate taxonomic context. Our recommendations are intended to spur discussion among biologists, as broad community consensus is critical ahead of the implementation of new editions of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and other Codes of bionomenclature.

References

  1. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021 Jun;71(6): [PMID: 34191704]
  2. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:596746 [PMID: 24809056]
  3. Zookeys. 2021 Dec 07;1075:77-136 [PMID: 35046752]
  4. Syst Biol. 2022 Oct 12;71(6):1404-1422 [PMID: 35556139]
  5. Microorganisms. 2020 Aug 15;8(8): [PMID: 32824262]
  6. Zookeys. 2021 Nov 16;1071:43-48 [PMID: 34876870]
  7. PLoS Genet. 2014 May 08;10(5):e1004351 [PMID: 24809441]
  8. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021 Jan;71(1): [PMID: 33300858]
  9. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):102-103 [PMID: 30981555]
  10. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Nov;8(6):1256-9 [PMID: 21586014]
  11. Biology (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;11(7): [PMID: 36101467]
  12. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Nov;20(6):1761-1768 [PMID: 32623815]
  13. IMA Fungus. 2021 May 3;12(1):11 [PMID: 33934723]
  14. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2022 Sep;45(5):126305 [PMID: 36049255]
  15. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 20;21(1):151 [PMID: 32312224]
  16. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 Jul;22(5):2038-2053 [PMID: 35094504]
  17. Nat Microbiol. 2022 Oct;7(10):1702-1708 [PMID: 36123442]
  18. ISME J. 2021 Jul;15(7):1879-1892 [PMID: 33824426]
  19. Syst Biol. 2023 Jun 16;72(2):391-403 [PMID: 36301156]
  20. Cladistics. 2022 Apr;38(2):264-275 [PMID: 34487362]
  21. Trends Genet. 2005 Oct;21(10):533-6 [PMID: 16098630]
  22. Zookeys. 2021 Feb 02;1013:1-665 [PMID: 34512087]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 08;13:1067315 [PMID: 36569075]
  24. Insects. 2022 Jan 12;13(1): [PMID: 35055925]
  25. Science. 2014 Dec 12;346(6215):1320-31 [PMID: 25504713]
  26. Nat Microbiol. 2021 May;6(5):540-548 [PMID: 33903746]
  27. Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;11(16): [PMID: 36015459]
  28. Fungal Biol. 2016 Nov;120(11):1323-1340 [PMID: 27742092]
  29. Syst Biol. 2016 Nov;65(6):1085-1095 [PMID: 27146045]
  30. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019 Jan;69(1A):S1-S111 [PMID: 26596770]
  31. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 May;22(4):1626-1638 [PMID: 34863029]
  32. IMA Fungus. 2018 Jun;9(1):177-183 [PMID: 30018878]
  33. Zookeys. 2022 Feb 25;1087:199-220 [PMID: 35585942]
  34. Zookeys. 2020 Apr 30;931:1-9 [PMID: 32405237]
  35. Front Zool. 2013 Mar 27;10(1):15 [PMID: 23537182]
  36. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 5;371(1702): [PMID: 27481785]
  37. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267390 [PMID: 35482734]

MeSH Term

DNA
Phenotype
Sequence Analysis, DNA

Chemicals

DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0speciesdiagnosesnewCodesbionomenclaturerequirementsDNA-basedtaxonomicdescriptionscontainInternationalZoologicalNomenclatureeditionsModernadvancesDNAsequencingholdpromisefacilitatingorganismseverfinerprecisioncomechallengesmajorpoorlydefinedsubspecieshenceforthparticularlyproblematictaxonomycommissionersCommissionadvocatetighteningdefinition"speciesdiagnosis"futureexampleintroductionspecificinformationcharacterstatesdifferentiatingtraitscomparisonsimilarprovisionsenhancestandardsensureincludingonesadequatecontextrecommendationsintendedspurdiscussionamongbiologistsbroadcommunityconsensuscriticalaheadimplementationCodeTighteninghelpintegratepractice

Similar Articles

Cited By