Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography.

He Liu, Conghui Li, Shaohua Ren, Tong Li, Hongliang Zhong, Jianwen Jia, Hongchao Yang, Yi Qi, Junqiang Feng, Youxiang Li, Yang Wang
Author Information
  1. He Liu: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  2. Conghui Li: Department of Neurosurgery, Hebei Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  3. Shaohua Ren: Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shanxi, Taiyuan, China.
  4. Tong Li: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  5. Hongliang Zhong: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  6. Jianwen Jia: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  7. Hongchao Yang: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  8. Yi Qi: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. ORCID
  9. Junqiang Feng: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  10. Youxiang Li: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 15110299052@163.com liyouxiang@263.net.
  11. Yang Wang: Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 15110299052@163.com liyouxiang@263.net.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery.
METHODS: From December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59��25.60���min versus 47.94��27.49���min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01��554.77���mGy versus 821.65��705.45���mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1991;205(1):35-8 [PMID: 1670073]
  2. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;30(2):203-208 [PMID: 32607626]
  3. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):361-378 [PMID: 32169184]
  4. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 May;29(3):248-253 [PMID: 29553953]
  5. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 May;10(5):481-486 [PMID: 28942424]
  6. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019 Jan;28(1):89-100 [PMID: 30414684]
  7. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):341-344 [PMID: 32115435]
  8. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988 Feb;35(2):153-60 [PMID: 3280462]
  9. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 May;42(5):808-814 [PMID: 33541906]
  10. World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:216-223 [PMID: 28089806]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Cerebral Angiography
Aged
Time Factors
Radiation Exposure
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Predictive Value of Tests
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Radiography, Interventional
Treatment Outcome
China
Radiation Dosage
Operative Time
Endovascular Procedures
Adult
Risk Factors
Equipment Design

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0angiographysystemcerebralgroupsneurointerventionalrobot-assistedgroupraterespectivelyversusangiographersroomradiationoperationtwocontrolexperimentalpresentsurgeryDSAtrialsafetyresearchsurgicalDecemberpatientssuccesscatheterreachingtargetvesseltimeX-rayincidenceadverseeventsBACKGROUND:requiresperformoperationsdigitalsubtractionIonisingchronicjointdamagestillunavoidableThereforeresearcheddevelopedoperatedoperatingoutsideconductedprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledevaluateefficacyhumanfuturewillprovideplatformdevelopmentintelligentbringrevolutionaryprogressMETHODS:20202021260enrolledthreemedicalcentresrandomlyequallydividedclinicalroutineexposurerelatedcomparedRESULTS:total257completedbaselinecharacteristicsdiffersignificantly100%9923%10000%angiographic4859��2560���min4794��2749���mindose73501��55477���mGy82165��70545���mGy2344%2248%statisticaldifferencesCONCLUSION:convenientsafeeffectivetraditionalEfficacyroboticassistanceAngiographyBrainClinicalTrialEquipmentSuppliesTechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By