Application of the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics to severe challenging behavior.

Louis P Hagopian, John Michael Falligant
Author Information
  1. Louis P Hagopian: Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  2. John Michael Falligant: Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Abstract

The evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics (ETBD) is a genetic algorithm that applies the Darwinian principles of evolutionary biology to model how behavior changes dynamically via selection by contingencies of reinforcement. The ETBD is a complexity theory where low-level rules of selection, reproduction, and mutation operate iteratively to animate "artificial organisms" that generate emergent outcomes. Numerous studies have demonstrated the ETBD can accurately model behavior of live animals in the laboratory, and it has been applied recently to model automatically maintained self-injury. The purpose of the current series of studies was to further extend the application of the ETBD to model additional functional classes of challenging behavior and clinical procedures. Outcomes obtained with artificial organisms generally corresponded well with outcomes observed with clinical cases sourced from consecutive controlled case series studies. Conceptual and methodological considerations on the application of the ETBD to model challenging behavior are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Modif. 2019 Apr 9;:145445519839213 [PMID: 30961351]
  2. J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):428-441 [PMID: 36855029]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):241-60 [PMID: 21451751]
  4. Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):731-50 [PMID: 24219847]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):688-703 [PMID: 35290666]
  6. J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Jan;50(1):48-66 [PMID: 28032344]
  7. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):177-93 [PMID: 16033165]
  8. Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;17(1):43-57 [PMID: 22478172]
  9. Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;32(2):339-62 [PMID: 22478533]
  10. Behav Processes. 2022 Apr;197:104623 [PMID: 35318109]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861-74 [PMID: 16811415]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jul;118(1):148-155 [PMID: 35534950]
  13. Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Mar 3;46(1):119-136 [PMID: 37006601]
  14. Behav Processes. 2023 May;208:104860 [PMID: 36967093]
  15. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):877-95 [PMID: 22219536]
  16. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Dec;62(12):1108-1113 [PMID: 29027294]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):387-403 [PMID: 19070343]
  18. Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):100-127 [PMID: 27794452]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Sep;116(2):243-248 [PMID: 34219242]
  20. Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 May 26;44(4):561-580 [PMID: 35098025]
  21. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Mar;49(1):105-21 [PMID: 26482103]
  22. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Oct;51(4):974-997 [PMID: 29989153]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Sep;112(2):128-143 [PMID: 31385310]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Mar;107(2):218-233 [PMID: 28194793]
  25. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):596-619 [PMID: 32125716]
  26. Behav Processes. 2015 May;114:14-25 [PMID: 25680328]
  27. Behav Modif. 2023 Jan;47(1):113-127 [PMID: 35684955]
  28. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jul;51(3):620-633 [PMID: 29774545]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Mar;105(2):270-90 [PMID: 27002687]
  30. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Sep;53(4):2172-2185 [PMID: 32588920]
  31. Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):428-34 [PMID: 20152891]
  32. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Sep;116(2):225-242 [PMID: 34383960]
  33. J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Oct Autumn (Fall);56(4):869-883 [PMID: 37464543]
  34. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Nov;110(3):323-335 [PMID: 30195256]
  35. J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Jan;111(1):130-145 [PMID: 30656712]
  36. J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):442-457 [PMID: 36922699]
  37. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2935-42 [PMID: 21696917]
  38. J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):813-823 [PMID: 33103244]
  39. Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Jun 4;44(4):581-603 [PMID: 35098026]
  40. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jul;51(3):443-465 [PMID: 29781180]
  41. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Nov;114(3):430-446 [PMID: 33025598]
  42. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):130-46 [PMID: 24114090]
  43. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Sep;114(2):163-178 [PMID: 32856313]
  44. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):523-43 [PMID: 26223959]
  45. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Jan;113(1):57-76 [PMID: 31777091]
  46. Behav Processes. 2022 Nov;203:104776 [PMID: 36336310]
  47. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):217-21 [PMID: 6716037]
  48. J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):88-100 [PMID: 24114088]
  49. Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;19(1):19-33 [PMID: 22478237]
  50. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197-209 [PMID: 8063622]
  51. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 May;81(3):297-317 [PMID: 15357512]

Grants

  1. P50 HD103538/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD076653/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Biological Evolution
Male
Problem Behavior
Reinforcement, Psychology
Animals
Female
Child
Algorithms
Psychological Theory
Adolescent
Models, Psychological

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviortheoryETBDmodelevolutionarydynamicsstudieschallengingselectioncomplexityoutcomesseriesapplicationclinicalseveregeneticalgorithmappliesDarwinianprinciplesbiologychangesdynamicallyviacontingenciesreinforcementlow-levelrulesreproductionmutationoperateiterativelyanimate"artificialorganisms"generateemergentNumerousdemonstratedcanaccuratelyliveanimalslaboratoryappliedrecentlyautomaticallymaintainedself-injurypurposecurrentextendadditionalfunctionalclassesproceduresOutcomesobtainedartificialorganismsgenerallycorrespondedwellobservedcasessourcedconsecutivecontrolledcaseConceptualmethodologicalconsiderationsdiscussedApplicationdeterminismselectionism

Similar Articles

Cited By