The Outcomes of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Part-Time and Temporary Working University Students.

Emma Johansson, Rona Hart
Author Information
  1. Emma Johansson: School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.
  2. Rona Hart: School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK. ORCID

Abstract

The personal outcomes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) have recently gained popularity in research, but it is rarely studied in part-time or temporary employees and, in particular, in employed university students. The aim of the current study was to address this gap in the literature by investigating the outcomes of OCB, including job stress, work-university conflict, work-leisure conflict, intent to quit, well-being, and job satisfaction, in university students who undertake contingent and part-time work. Using a correlational research design, data collection was conducted through an online survey administered to 122 employed university students. The correlation analysis revealed that OCB correlated positively with work-university conflict and work-leisure conflict, which is aligned with earlier work. However, in contrast to earlier findings, OCB did not correlate with well-being, stress, job satisfaction or intent to quit. Regression analyses revealed that OCB positively predicted job satisfaction, when entered together with work-university conflict, job stress, and intent to quit. OCB also predicted job stress when entered with job satisfaction. However, OCB did not predict well-being. In turn, work-university conflict negatively predicted well-being. The current findings differ from the wider literature on full-time employees, which suggests a need for further research to examine why these differences exist and what are their practical implications.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 1998 Apr;83(2):247-60 [PMID: 9577234]
  2. J Appl Psychol. 1997 Apr;82(2):262-70 [PMID: 9109284]
  3. J Appl Psychol. 1993 Aug;78(4):552-6 [PMID: 8407703]
  4. Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):93-104 [PMID: 14992636]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):269-77 [PMID: 17227168]
  6. J Appl Psychol. 1998 Apr;83(2):277-87 [PMID: 9577235]
  7. J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):199-236 [PMID: 23458336]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):122-41 [PMID: 19186900]
  9. Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 17;11:460 [PMID: 32256434]
  10. J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):131-42 [PMID: 11916207]
  11. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):282-94 [PMID: 12124722]
  12. PeerJ. 2016 Apr 26;4:e1896 [PMID: 27168960]
  13. Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):595-9 [PMID: 23467185]
  14. J Appl Psychol. 1996 Aug;81(4):380-99 [PMID: 8751455]
  15. Am J Health Promot. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(3):194-8 [PMID: 15693347]
  16. J Appl Psychol. 1986 Nov;71(4):618-29 [PMID: 3804934]
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):702-15 [PMID: 21744973]
  18. J Psychol. 1999 Nov;133(6):656-68 [PMID: 10589519]
  19. J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):56-74 [PMID: 25111252]
  20. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 18;13(2): [PMID: 36829415]
  21. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):900-12 [PMID: 19594233]
  22. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:140-145 [PMID: 34634715]
  23. J Health Soc Behav. 2001 Jun;42(2):115-31 [PMID: 11467248]
  24. J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):740-8 [PMID: 16060790]
  25. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1452-65 [PMID: 19916655]
  26. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;18(12): [PMID: 34204798]
  27. J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1241-55 [PMID: 16316277]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22): [PMID: 31731590]
  29. J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep;105(9):944-958 [PMID: 31904249]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0OCBjobconflictstresswork-universitywell-beingsatisfactionOrganizationalCitizenshipresearchpart-timeuniversitystudentsintentquitpredictedoutcomesBehavioremployeesemployedcurrentliteraturework-leisureworkrevealedpositivelyearlierHoweverfindingsenteredpersonalrecentlygainedpopularityrarelystudiedtemporaryparticularaimstudyaddressgapinvestigatingincludingundertakecontingentUsingcorrelationaldesigndatacollectionconductedonlinesurveyadministered122correlationanalysiscorrelatedalignedcontrastcorrelateRegressionanalysestogetheralsopredictturnnegativelydifferwiderfull-timesuggestsneedexaminedifferencesexistpracticalimplicationsOutcomesBehaviorsPart-TimeTemporaryWorkingUniversityStudentsemploymentprosocialbehavior

Similar Articles

Cited By