Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields-Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies.

Kjell Hansson Mild, Mats-Olof Mattsson, Peter Jeschke, Michel Israel, Mihaela Ivanova, Tsvetelina Shalamanova
Author Information
  1. Kjell Hansson Mild: Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
  2. Mats-Olof Mattsson: SciProof International AB, 83158 Östersund, Sweden. ORCID
  3. Peter Jeschke: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 44194 Dortmund, Germany. ORCID
  4. Michel Israel: National Centre of Public Health and Analyses, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria. ORCID
  5. Mihaela Ivanova: National Centre of Public Health and Analyses, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
  6. Tsvetelina Shalamanova: National Centre of Public Health and Analyses, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Abstract

The designs of in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies do not adequately reflect the characteristics of long-term occupational EMF exposure; the higher exposure levels permitted for employees are nevertheless extrapolated on this basis. Epidemiological studies consider occupational exposure only in a very general way, if at all. There is a lack of detailed descriptive data on long-term occupational exposure over the duration of the working life. Most studies reflect exposure characteristics of the general population, exposures which are long-term, but at a comparably low level. Occupational exposure is often intermittent with high peak power followed by periods with no exposure. Furthermore, the EU EMF-Directive 2013/35/EU states a demand for occupational health surveillance, the outcome of which would be of great help to epidemiologists studying the health effects of EMF exposure. This paper thus aims to outline and specify differences between public and occupational exposure and to increase the understanding of specific aspects of occupational exposure which are important for long-term health considerations. This could lead to a future protection concept against possible hazards based on adequate descriptions of long-term exposures and also include supplementary descriptive features such as a "reset time" of biological systems and accurate dose quantities.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Invest. 2011 Jun;121(6):2133-41 [PMID: 21633182]
  2. Mutat Res. 2021 Jul-Dec;823:111756 [PMID: 34153743]
  3. Health Phys. 2009 Apr;96(4):504-14 [PMID: 19276710]
  4. BMC Biol. 2022 Jun 15;20(1):142 [PMID: 35705939]
  5. Health Phys. 2014 Mar;106(3):418-25 [PMID: 25208018]
  6. Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7896-7909 [PMID: 35674823]
  7. Ind Health. 2022 Jun 1;60(3):201-215 [PMID: 34789598]
  8. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):304-15 [PMID: 22377680]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20): [PMID: 34682417]
  10. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:994758 [PMID: 36187692]
  11. Heliyon. 2023 Jun 20;9(6):e17153 [PMID: 37416650]
  12. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2018 Nov;(595): [PMID: 33562898]
  13. Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524 [PMID: 32167495]
  14. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014;158(3):251-62 [PMID: 24044904]
  15. Health Phys. 2021 Sep 1;121(3):234-247 [PMID: 34261892]
  16. Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1302-1302.e1 [PMID: 26967295]
  17. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(2):277-91 [PMID: 26670356]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4): [PMID: 33579004]
  19. Bioelectromagnetics. 1992;13(6):453-67 [PMID: 1482412]
  20. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Jul 14;30(5):695-703 [PMID: 28584329]
  21. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 06;22(7): [PMID: 33917298]
  22. Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 02;10:875946 [PMID: 35757616]
  23. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 10;13:920261 [PMID: 36034454]
  24. Cell. 2010 Jun 25;141(7):1262-1262.e1 [PMID: 20603006]
  25. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001 Jul;22(5):306-15 [PMID: 11424153]
  26. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020 Sep;41(6):471-479 [PMID: 32692453]
  27. Health Phys. 2010 Dec;99(6):818-36 [PMID: 21068601]
  28. J Cell Biochem. 2004 Sep 1;93(1):83-92 [PMID: 15352165]
  29. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Nov 12;16:100486 [PMID: 31799474]
  30. Br J Cancer. 2000 Sep;83(5):692-8 [PMID: 10944614]
  31. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006 Mar;209(2):133-8 [PMID: 16503299]
  32. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Oct 20;11(1):24-32 [PMID: 31647056]
  33. Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:565-573 [PMID: 29621724]

MeSH Term

Humans
Electromagnetic Fields
Epidemiologists
Occupational Exposure
Occupational Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exposureoccupationallong-termhealthstudiesgeneralreflectcharacteristicsEMFdescriptivepopulationexposuresOccupationalsurveillanceeffectsbiologicalExposuredesignsvivovitrosilicoadequatelyhigherlevelspermittedemployeesneverthelessextrapolatedbasisEpidemiologicalconsiderwaylackdetaileddatadurationworkinglifecomparablylowleveloftenintermittenthighpeakpowerfollowedperiodsFurthermoreEUEMF-Directive2013/35/EUstatesdemandoutcomegreathelpepidemiologistsstudyingpaperthusaimsoutlinespecifydifferencespublicincreaseunderstandingspecificaspectsimportantconsiderationsleadfutureprotectionconceptpossiblehazardsbasedadequatedescriptionsalsoincludesupplementaryfeatures"resettime"systemsaccuratedosequantitiesElectromagneticFields-DifferentGeneralPublicLaboratoryStudieselectromagneticfieldworkers

Similar Articles

Cited By