Coping and Quality of Life Differences between Emergency and Rehabilitation Healthcare Workers.

Davide Cardile, Francesco Corallo, Augusto Ielo, Irene Cappadona, Maria Pagano, Placido Bramanti, Giangaetano D'Aleo, Rosella Ciurleo, Maria Cristina De Cola
Author Information
  1. Davide Cardile: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  2. Francesco Corallo: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  3. Augusto Ielo: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  4. Irene Cappadona: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  5. Maria Pagano: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  6. Placido Bramanti: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  7. Giangaetano D'Aleo: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.
  8. Rosella Ciurleo: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID
  9. Maria Cristina De Cola: IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, S.S. 113 Via Palermo, C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Audit and Feedback (A&F) is a systematic process involving the collection of data, which are subsequently compared with the established reference standards and then subsequently disseminated to healthcare providers through feedback meetings. This allows continuous improvement to be ensured in the quality of care processes. Often, the parameters taken into account concern only the patient and the treatment processes, neglecting other variables. Quality of life in the workplace and coping skills are determining variables for the clinical performance of all healthcare professionals. For this reason, in this study, these variables were investigated and differences were highlighted in two different role categories and context: cardiovascular emergency and neurological rehabilitation. A psychological screening was carried out by sending the computerized Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI) and Professional Quality of Life Scale-5 (ProQoL) questionnaires to all healthcare workers involved. Ninety-five healthcare providers (mean ± SD age: 47 ± 10.4 years; 37.9% male) answered the questionnaire and were assigned into two groups (G1 and G2) based on the ward in which they worked. These were further divided into two subgroups (R1 and R2) based on their role. The obtained results show that avoidance strategies are used more by health professionals working in rehabilitation (G2) wards than in intensive-care units (G1). Moreover, in G1 nurses, physical therapists and speech therapists (R2) obtained higher scores in terms of turning to religion (TR) and compassion satisfaction (CS), while physicians and psychologists (R1) obtained higher scores on the burnout scale (BO). The TR score for R2 was found to be higher, even in G2. The response trend of the two groups in the different departments was analyzed and commented on.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Dec;22(4):1161-1168 [PMID: 33094887]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;115(3):495-525 [PMID: 30024183]
  3. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Aug;50(2):200-7 [PMID: 25701688]
  4. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Apr - Jun;31(2):60-70 [PMID: 31253584]
  5. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Dec;49(6):1027-36 [PMID: 27419688]
  6. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr 1;175(7):698-704 [PMID: 17110646]
  7. J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:8-13 [PMID: 26987261]
  8. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542 [PMID: 32485289]
  9. Emerg Nurse. 2015 Jul;23(4):32-7; quiz 38 [PMID: 26159347]
  10. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2015 Winter;5(3):251-69 [PMID: 26752581]
  11. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;27(1):52-6 [PMID: 24270483]
  12. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2013 Aug;35(206):94-9 [PMID: 24052989]
  13. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 25;14(23): [PMID: 36501040]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 02;18(15): [PMID: 34360465]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21): [PMID: 34769948]
  16. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e2010185 [PMID: 32463467]
  17. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):1114-21 [PMID: 22030575]
  18. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 21;58(2): [PMID: 35208650]
  19. J Relig Health. 2019 Aug;58(4):1444-1452 [PMID: 31098828]
  20. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1974 Fall;5(4):321-33 [PMID: 4618837]
  21. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5): [PMID: 36901183]
  23. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 16;14:1139260 [PMID: 37009102]
  24. J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529 [PMID: 29505159]
  25. Recenti Prog Med. 2021 Sep;112(9):574-578 [PMID: 34392322]
  26. Community Ment Health J. 1996 Apr;32(2):173-89; discussion 191-3 [PMID: 8777873]
  27. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102119 [PMID: 32339895]
  28. Nurs Open. 2019 Apr 09;6(3):878-888 [PMID: 31367411]
  29. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(50):e5629 [PMID: 27977605]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 02;18(17): [PMID: 34501877]
  31. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:651-671 [PMID: 30265823]
  32. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e042752 [PMID: 33087382]
  33. Soins Psychiatr. 2018 Sep - Oct;39(318):12-19 [PMID: 30241629]
  34. Psychol Health Med. 2017 Dec;22(10):1262-1270 [PMID: 28503931]
  35. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):992-1003 [PMID: 3712234]
  36. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Mar;50(3):571-9 [PMID: 3701593]
  37. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jan-Feb;71(1):135-141 [PMID: 29324955]
  38. Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Aug 15;6(6):273-80 [PMID: 25363109]
  39. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3613-3619 [PMID: 32815055]
  40. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Apr;46(4):839-52 [PMID: 6737195]
  41. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:377-401 [PMID: 17716061]
  42. Orv Hetil. 2019 Jan;160(1):12-19 [PMID: 30599782]
  43. J Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;61(4):461-80 [PMID: 15503316]
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22): [PMID: 33198084]
  45. Am J Nurs. 2019 Jul;119(7):24-33 [PMID: 31180912]
  46. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0238666 [PMID: 33861739]
  47. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:21-31 [PMID: 30928718]
  48. Recenti Prog Med. 2020 Dec;111(12):714-716 [PMID: 33362167]
  49. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 22;13(6): [PMID: 27338436]
  50. Int Nurs Rev. 2007 Mar;54(1):92-9 [PMID: 17305963]
  51. BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):474 [PMID: 35264130]
  52. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):412 [PMID: 28629360]
  53. J Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;74(4):680-694 [PMID: 29023713]
  54. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 23;19(15): [PMID: 35897337]
  55. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Apr 23;404:113142 [PMID: 33508350]
  56. Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;10:907201 [PMID: 36033745]
  57. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Dec;37(6):810-818 [PMID: 36326087]
  58. Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991 [PMID: 28616996]
  59. Skinmed. 2022 Dec 20;20(6):408-409 [PMID: 36537671]
  60. J Ment Health. 2017 Oct;26(5):471-480 [PMID: 27960598]
  61. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):536-42 [PMID: 9546001]
  62. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Apr;66(2):411-22 [PMID: 9583344]
  63. Psicothema. 2021 Feb;33(1):118-124 [PMID: 33453744]
  64. Pediatrics. 2022 Jul 1;150(1): [PMID: 35686476]
  65. Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 09;10:1525 [PMID: 31354566]
  66. BMJ. 2020 May 05;369:m1642 [PMID: 32371466]
  67. J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 26;9(1): [PMID: 31888017]
  68. Adv Mind Body Med. 2021 Winter;35(1):4-8 [PMID: 33513580]
  69. Soins. 2018 Nov;63(830):28-32 [PMID: 30449467]
  70. Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):88-94 [PMID: 33412798]
  71. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1): [PMID: 33396750]
  72. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4321-4330 [PMID: 32860287]

Grants

  1. NET-2016-02364191/Ministero della Salute

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthcaretwovariablesQualityrehabilitationG1G2R2obtainedhighersubsequentlyprovidersqualityprocesseslifeprofessionalsdifferentroleemergencyCopingLife±groupsbasedR1therapistsscoresTRburnoutAuditFeedbackA&FsystematicprocessinvolvingcollectiondatacomparedestablishedreferencestandardsdisseminatedfeedbackmeetingsallowscontinuousimprovementensuredcareOftenparameterstakenaccountconcernpatienttreatmentneglectingworkplacecopingskillsdeterminingclinicalperformancereasonstudyinvestigateddifferenceshighlightedcategoriescontext:cardiovascularneurologicalpsychologicalscreeningcarriedsendingcomputerizedOrientationProblemsExperienced-NuovaVersioneItalianaCOPE-NVIProfessionalScale-5ProQoLquestionnairesworkersinvolvedNinety-fivemeanSDage:47104years379%maleansweredquestionnaireassignedwardworkeddividedsubgroupsresultsshowavoidancestrategiesusedhealthworkingwardsintensive-careunitsMoreovernursesphysicalspeechtermsturningreligioncompassionsatisfactionCSphysicianspsychologistsscaleBOscorefoundevenresponsetrenddepartmentsanalyzedcommentedonDifferencesEmergencyRehabilitationHealthcareWorkersEASY-NETaudit

Similar Articles

Cited By