A case of a false positive HIV antigen/antibody screen in a pregnant woman at delivery and the clinical importance of reviewing signal-to-cutoff ratio values.

Talia Wall
Author Information
  1. Talia Wall: Touro College of Pharmacy, United States of America.

Abstract

We present a unique case not previously touched upon in the literature, and its ensuing management, of a falsely reactive HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) screening test which resulted in a woman during active labor, hours after rupture of membranes. The patient was screened for HIV using the ARCHITECT 4th generation HIV 1 and 2 Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab) Combo assay, and the results were repeatedly reactive. A cesarean delivery was recommended, and the patient received intrapartum antiretroviral therapy. Due to rapid progression of labor, the infant was delivered vaginally and received multiple doses of antiretroviral therapy. For confirmation, a viral load PCR test was obtained which resulted undetectable, and it was concluded that the screening results were falsely positive. While the cause of the inaccurate screening result is still unclear, a COVID-19 vaccination in close proximity to the delivery remains suspicious. Four months after delivery, the patient's screening test was no longer reactive.

Keywords

References

  1. Data Brief. 2020 May 16;31:105707 [PMID: 32462068]
  2. J Clin Virol. 2018 Jun;103:43-47 [PMID: 29635210]
  3. Clin Lab. 2022 Apr 1;68(4): [PMID: 35443578]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Dec 21;60(12):e0120422 [PMID: 36448814]
  5. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Mar 1;89(3):332-339 [PMID: 35147582]
  6. J Clin Virol. 2019 Apr;113:31-34 [PMID: 30844622]
  7. J Clin Virol. 2017 Jun;91:73-78 [PMID: 28434809]
  8. J Clin Pathol. 2021 Sep;74(9):614 [PMID: 32907911]
  9. J Infect Chemother. 2021 Jul;27(7):1112-1114 [PMID: 33902991]
  10. J Clin Virol. 2013 Dec;58 Suppl 1:e38-43 [PMID: 24029686]
  11. J Virol Methods. 2015 Mar;214:33-6 [PMID: 25173424]
  12. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov;71:103027 [PMID: 34777794]
  13. Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Aug 10;2022:5097189 [PMID: 36016828]
  14. J Clin Virol. 2011 Dec;52 Suppl 1:S51-5 [PMID: 21983253]
  15. Data Brief. 2021 Nov 06;39:107549 [PMID: 34820493]
  16. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):826-8; discussion 1176 [PMID: 27016590]
  17. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Oct;17(10):1642-4 [PMID: 20685938]
  18. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22866 [PMID: 30803030]
  19. IDCases. 2020 Jun 25;21:e00886 [PMID: 32642434]
  20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):408.e1-408.e9 [PMID: 29913173]
  21. AIDS Res Ther. 2016 Jan 05;13:1 [PMID: 26734067]
  22. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 May;53(5):1709-11 [PMID: 25673794]
  23. Lab Med. 2014 Summer;45(3):259-63 [PMID: 25051080]
  24. AIDS. 2021 Jul 15;35(9):1521-1522 [PMID: 34185720]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HIVscreeningdeliveryreactivetesttherapycasefalselyresultedwomanlaborpatientresultsreceivedantiretroviralpositiveratiopresentuniquepreviouslytoucheduponliteratureensuingmanagementhumanimmunodeficiencyvirusactivehoursrupturemembranesscreenedusingARCHITECT4thgeneration12Antigen/AntibodyAg/AbComboassayrepeatedlycesareanrecommendedintrapartumDuerapidprogressioninfantdeliveredvaginallymultipledosesconfirmationviralloadPCRobtainedundetectableconcludedcauseinaccurateresultstillunclearCOVID-19vaccinationcloseproximityremainssuspiciousFourmonthspatient'slongerfalseantigen/antibodyscreenpregnantclinicalimportancereviewingsignal-to-cutoffvaluesAntiretroviralHumanImmunodeficiencyVirusPerinataltransmissionSignal-to-cutoff

Similar Articles

Cited By