In Situ Simulation and Clinical Outcomes in Infants Born Preterm.

Ritu Chitkara, Mihoko Bennett, Janine Bohnert, Nicole Yamada, Janene Fuerch, Louis P Halamek, Jenny Quinn, Kimber Padua, Jeffrey Gould, Jochen Profit, Xiao Xu, Henry C Lee
Author Information
  1. Ritu Chitkara: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE), Stanford, CA. Electronic address: chitkara@stanford.edu.
  2. Mihoko Bennett: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  3. Janine Bohnert: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  4. Nicole Yamada: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE), Stanford, CA.
  5. Janene Fuerch: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE), Stanford, CA.
  6. Louis P Halamek: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE), Stanford, CA.
  7. Jenny Quinn: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  8. Kimber Padua: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  9. Jeffrey Gould: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  10. Jochen Profit: Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA.
  11. Xiao Xu: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  12. Henry C Lee: California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of a multihospital collaborative quality improvement project implementing in situ simulation training for neonatal resuscitation on clinical outcomes for infants born preterm.
STUDY DESIGN: Twelve neonatal intensive care units were divided into 4 cohorts; each completed a 15-month long program in a stepped wedge manner. Data from California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Infants with very low birth weight between 22 through 31 weeks gestation were included. Primary outcome was survival without chronic lung disease (CLD); secondary outcomes included intubation in the delivery room, delivery room continuous positive airway pressure, hypothermia (<36��C) upon neonatal intensive care unit admission, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, and mortality before hospital discharge. A mixed effects multivariable regression model was used to assess the intervention effect.
RESULTS: Between March 2017 and December 2020, a total of 2626 eligible very low birth weight births occurred at 12 collaborative participating sites. Rate of survival without CLD at participating sites was 74.1% in March to August 2017 and 76.0% in July to December 2020 (risk ratio 1.03; [0.94-1.12]); no significant improvement occurred during the study period for both participating and nonparticipating sites. The effect of in situ simulation on all secondary outcomes was stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multihospital collaborative providing in situ training for neonatal resuscitation did not result in significant improvement in survival without CLD. Ongoing in situ simulations may have an impact on unit practice and unmeasured outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Endoscopy. 2005 Dec;37(12):1198-204 [PMID: 16329017]
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):723-31 [PMID: 18310377]
  3. Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):376-384 [PMID: 27504890]
  4. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Aug;37(8):357-64 [PMID: 21874971]
  5. Resuscitation. 2022 Sep;178:109-115 [PMID: 35700883]
  6. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Apr 20;13:59 [PMID: 23601190]
  7. Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jul;19(5):566-571 [PMID: 30684655]
  8. J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1717-1724 [PMID: 33896733]
  9. Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):115-20 [PMID: 20103076]
  10. Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:109-13 [PMID: 26282500]
  11. Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):843-854 [PMID: 32399730]
  12. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):55-60 [PMID: 26247569]
  13. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50 [PMID: 14760660]
  14. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):856-60 [PMID: 25162513]
  15. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):124-9 [PMID: 23112286]
  16. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Dec 23;8:11-19 [PMID: 28096704]
  17. Semin Perinatol. 2016 Nov;40(7):447-454 [PMID: 27823817]
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 16;12:CD011545 [PMID: 33325570]
  19. Pediatrics. 2011 Oct;128(4):e954-8 [PMID: 21930542]
  20. Children (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;7(11): [PMID: 33137897]
  21. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Aug;28(8):1078-89 [PMID: 23595919]
  22. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91 [PMID: 16829207]
  23. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):361-8 [PMID: 16923483]
  24. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):654-8 [PMID: 11015505]
  25. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Dec;18(6):369-72 [PMID: 24051303]
  26. J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1553-1557.e1 [PMID: 23866717]
  27. Am J Perinatol. 2016 Mar;33(4):385-92 [PMID: 26485251]
  28. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct;23(5):312-320 [PMID: 30369405]
  29. BJOG. 2006 Feb;113(2):177-82 [PMID: 16411995]
  30. Semin Perinatol. 2016 Nov;40(7):438-446 [PMID: 27692475]
  31. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):797-804 [PMID: 17512301]
  32. Children (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;8(1): [PMID: 33445638]
  33. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4 [PMID: 12368674]
  34. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;197(5):541.e1-5 [PMID: 17980202]

Grants

  1. R01 HD087425/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR001863/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Pregnancy
Female
Infant, Newborn
Humans
Infant
Resuscitation
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Lung Diseases
Gestational Age
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0neonataloutcomescollaborativesituresuscitationCLDimprovementintensivecaresurvivalwithoutunitparticipatingsitesevaluateimpactmultihospitalsimulationtrainingclinicalprogramusedInfantslowbirthweightincludedchroniclungdiseasesecondarydeliveryroomeffectMarch2017December2020occurredsignificantOBJECTIVE:qualityprojectimplementinginfantsbornpretermSTUDYDESIGN:Twelveunitsdivided4cohortscompleted15-monthlongsteppedwedgemannerDataCaliforniaPerinatalQualityCareCollaborative2231 weeksgestationPrimaryoutcomeintubationcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurehypothermia<36��CuponadmissionsevereintraventricularhemorrhagemortalityhospitaldischargemixedeffectsmultivariableregressionmodelassessinterventionRESULTS:total2626eligiblebirths12Rate741%August760%Julyriskratio103[094-112]studyperiodnonparticipatingstableCONCLUSIONS:ImplementationprovidingresultOngoingsimulationsmaypracticeunmeasuredSituSimulationClinicalOutcomesBornPretermNICUNRPneonateprematurity

Similar Articles

Cited By