Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education for Caring Patients with COVID-19.

Min Hye Lee, Eun-Young Noh
Author Information
  1. Min Hye Lee: College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. ORCID
  2. Eun-Young Noh: Department of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju, Korea. nossje@kku.ac.kr. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of medical staff gained immense significance in the context of the prolonged coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. However, few studies had explored the impact of simulation-based education on the ability of nursing students to care for the patients of COVID-19. This study provided nursing students with simulation-based education in caring for the patients of COVID-19 and confirmed its effectiveness.
METHODS: This study used a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design. The participants were recruited from the nursing departments of two universities in Korea through convenience sampling. A total of 79 participants were included: 37 in the intervention group and 42 in the control group. The intervention group received four sessions of simulation training based on the National League for Nursing Jeffries simulation theory.
RESULTS: The intervention group showed an improvement compared to the control group in terms of knowledge related to coronavirus, confidence in performing infection control skills, and perception of preparedness for caring for the patients of COVID-19, with a high-level of satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of anxiety.
CONCLUSION: This simulation is expected to be a significant strategy for alleviating the global burden in terms of staff safety and patient outcomes by improving the competencies of prospective medical staff in responding to pandemics.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; c2023 [cited 2023 Aug 14]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
  2. Li DF, Shi CX, Shi FZ, Zhao L, Zhao R, Kang WQ. Effects of simulation training on COVID-19 control ability and psychological states of nurses in a children's hospital. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2020;24(21):11381–11385. [PMID: 33215459]
  3. Jung HJ. Development and application of self-directed simulation education program based on Planned Behavior Theory: MERS scenario experience and nursing intention. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2018;9(2):1035–1048.
  4. Wu CJ, Gardner GE, Chang AM. Taiwanese nursing students' knowledge, application and confidence with standard and additional precautions in infection control. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2009;18(8):1105–1112. [PMID: 18647198]
  5. Mitchell BG, Say R, Wells A, Wilson F, Cloete L, Matheson L. Australian graduating nurses' knowledge, intentions and beliefs on infection prevention and control: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing 2014;13(1):43 [>PMCID: ]
  6. Park SJ, Han JE, Kwak KH. The influence of nursing students' knowledge, attitudes and infection prevention behaviors for COVID-19 upon the nursing intention for patients with the emerging infectious diseases. The Journal of Korean Nursing Research 2021;5(1):13–23.
  7. Swallow V, Coates M. Flexible education for new nursing roles: Reflections on two approaches. Nurse Education in Practice 2004;4(1):53–59. [PMID: 19038137]
  8. Park H, Kim Y. Infection control education programs for nursing students: A systematic review. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing 2021;28(2):237–248.
  9. Alanazi AA, Nicholson N, Thomas S. The use of simulation training to improve knowledge, skills, and confidence among healthcare students: A systematic review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 2017;15(3):2
  10. Dearmon V, Graves RJ, Hayden S, Mulekar MS, Lawrence SM, Jones L, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience. Journal of Nursing Education 2013;52(1):29–38. [PMID: 23230885]
  11. Meyer MN, Connors H, Hou Q, Gajewski B. The effect of simulation on clinical performance: A junior nursing student clinical comparison study. Simulation in Healthcare 2011;6(5):269–277. [PMID: 21785388]
  12. Dharra S, Kumar R. Promoting mental health of nurses during the coronavirus pandemic: Will the rapid deployment of nurses' training programs during COVID-19 improve self-efficacy and reduce anxiety? Cureus 2021;13(5):e15213 [>PMCID: ]
  13. Yoshikawa A, Tashiro N, Ohtsuka H, Aoki K, Togo S, Komaba K, et al. Protocol for educational programs on infection prevention/control for medical and healthcare student: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022;17(10):e0276851 [>PMCID: ]
  14. Groom JA, Henderson D, Sittner BJ. NLN/Jeffries simulation framework state of the science project: Simulation design characteristics. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2014;10(7):337–344.
  15. Hwang WJ, Lee J. Effectiveness of the infectious disease (COVID-19) simulation module program on nursing students: Disaster nursing scenarios. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2021;51(6):648–660. [PMID: 35023855]
  16. Jeffries PR. In: The NLN Jeffries simulation theory. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2016. pp. 1-72.
  17. Kim JY, Kim EJ. Effects of simulation on nursing students' knowledge, clinical reasoning, and self-confidence: A quasi-experimental study. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2015;27(5):604–611.
  18. Wu CJ, Gardner G, Chang AM. Nursing students' knowledge and practice of infection control precautions: An educational intervention. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009;65(10):2142–2149. [PMID: 20568319]
  19. NCSS. Power Analysis & Sample Size Software [computer Program]. Version PASS 2023. Kaysville: NCSS; 2023 Available from: https://www.ncss.com/download/pass/updates/pass-2023/
  20. Phrampus PE, O'Donnell JM. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Sim AJ, editors. The Comprehensive Textbook of Healthcare Simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 73-84.
  21. Jeffries PR, Rodgers B, Adamson K. NLN Jeffries simulation theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives 2015;36(5):292–293. [PMID: 26521496]
  22. Savitsky B, Findling Y, Ereli A, Hendel T. Anxiety and coping strategies among nursing students during the covid-19 pandemic. Nurse Education in Practice 2020;46:102809 [>PMCID: ]
  23. John B, Al-Sawad M. Perceived stress in clinical areas and emotional intelligence among baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology 2015;41(3):75–84.
  24. Kim SO. In: Influencing factors of infection control practices related to COVID-19 of nurse in emergency department [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2021. pp. 1-104.
  25. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine 2006;166(10):1092–1097. [PMID: 16717171]
  26. Pfizer. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) screeners [Internet]. New York: Pfizer; c2006 [cited 2022 Feb 5]. Available from: http://www.phqscreeners.com/
  27. Park JE, Kang SH, Won SD, Roh D, Kim WH. Assessment instruments for disaster behavioral health. Anxiety and Mood 2015;11(2):91–105.
  28. Jung AR, Hong EJ. A study on anxiety, knowledge, infection possibility, preventive possibility and preventive behavior level of COVID-19 in general public. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology 2020;10(8):87–98.
  29. Luctkar-Flude M, Baker C, Hopkins-Rosseel D, Pulling C, McGraw R, Medves J, et al. Development and evaluation of an interprofessional simulation-based learning module on infection control skills for prelicensure health professional students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2014;10(8):395–405.
  30. Carvalho E, Castro P, León E, Del Río A, Crespo F, Trigo L, et al. Multi-professional simulation and risk perception of health care workers caring for Ebola-infected patients. Nursing in Critical Care 2019;24(5):256–262. [PMID: 30460729]
  31. Khan JA, Kiani MRB. Impact of multi-professional simulation-based training on perceptions of safety and preparedness among health workers caring for coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Pakistan. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2020;17:19 [>PMCID: ]
  32. National League for Nursing (NLN). Description of available instruments [Internet]. New York: NLN; c2005 [cited 2022 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.nln.org/education/teaching-resources/tools-and-instrument
  33. Yoo JH. In: Factors influencing nursing students' flow experience and clinical competency in simulation-based education: Based on Jeffries's simulation model [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sungshin Women's University; 2016. pp. 1-71.
  34. Díaz-Guio DA, Ricardo-Zapata A, Ospina-Velez J, Gómez-Candamil G, Mora-Martinez S, Rodriguez-Morales AJ. Cognitive load and performance of health care professionals in donning and doffing PPE before and after a simulation-based educational intervention and its implications during the COVID-19 pandemic for biosafety. Le Infezioni in Medicina 2020;28 Suppl 1:111–117.
  35. Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review. Nurse Education Today 2017;49:63–71. [PMID: 27902949]
  36. Taha AA, Jadalla A, Bin Ali W, Firkins J, Norman S, Azar N. Structured simulations improves students' knowledge acquisition and perceptions of teaching effectiveness: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2021;30(21-22):3163–3170. [PMID: 33896066]
  37. Flood LS, Higbie J. A comparative assessment of nursing students' cognitive knowledge of blood transfusion using lecture and simulation. Nurse Education in Practice 2016;16(1):8–13. [PMID: 26073762]
  38. Patel SM, Miller CR, Schiavi A, Toy S, Schwengel DA. The sim must go on: Adapting resident education to the COVID-19 pandemic using telesimulation. Advances in Simulation 2020;5:26 [>PMCID: ]
  39. Decker S, Fey M, Sideras S, Caballero S, Rockstraw L, Boese T, et al. Standards of best practice: Simulation standard VI: The debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2013;9 6 Suppl:S26–S29.
  40. Neill MA, Wotton K. High-fidelity simulation debriefing in nursing education: A literature review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2011;7(5):e161–e168.
  41. Waxman KT. The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: Guidelines for nurse educators. Journal of Nursing Education 2010;49(1):29–35. [PMID: 19810672]
  42. Hernández-Martínez A, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Martínez-Arce A, Romero-Blanco C, García-Iglesias JJ, Gómez-Salgado J. Nursing students' experience and training in healthcare aid during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021 Feb 15; Forthcoming.
  43. Dharamsi A, Hayman K, Yi S, Chow R, Yee C, Gaylord E, et al. Enhancing departmental preparedness for COVID-19 using rapid-cycle in-situ simulation. Journal of Hospital Infection 2020;105(4):604–607. [>PMCID: ]
  44. Nielsen B, Harder N. Causes of student anxiety during simulation: What the literature says. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2013;9(11):e507–e512.
  45. Park JE, Kim JH. Nursing students' experiences of psychological safety in simulation education: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice 2021;55:103163 [PMID: 34333233]
  46. Yockey J, Henry M. Simulation anxiety across the curriculum. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2019;29:29–37.
  47. Hong CM. Development of a knowledge scale of fall risk factors for community-dwelling older adults. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing 2012;24(3):244–252.
  48. Chan CK, Lam TY, Mohanavel L, Ghani JA, Anuar ASK, Lee CJ, et al. Development and validation of the knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire (LAUNDERKAP) regarding white coat use among medical students during clinical practice. American Journal of Infection Control 2022;50(12):1374–1380. [PMID: 35292298]
  49. Terry VR, Moloney C, Bowtell L, Terry PC. Online intravenous pump emulator: As effective as face-to-face simulation for training nursing students. Nurse Education Today 2016;40:198–203. [PMID: 27125173]
  50. Charbonnier E, Trémolière B, Baussard L, Goncalves A, Lespiau F, Philippe AG, et al. Effects of an online self-help intervention on university students' mental health during COVID-19: A non-randomized controlled pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2022;5:100175 [>PMCID: ]

Grants

  1. 2020/Dong-A University

MeSH Term

Humans
Prospective Studies
COVID-19
Educational Status
Learning
Patient Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19groupcontrolstaffnursingpatientsinterventionsimulationNursingtermsmedicalcoronavirussimulation-basededucationstudentsstudycaringparticipantstwosignificantEducationPURPOSE:rolegainedimmensesignificancecontextprolongeddiseasepandemicHoweverstudiesexploredimpactabilitycareprovidedconfirmedeffectivenessMETHODS:usednon-equivalentpretest-posttestdesignrecruiteddepartmentsuniversitiesKoreaconveniencesamplingtotal79included:3742receivedfoursessionstrainingbasedNationalLeagueJeffriestheoryRESULTS:showedimprovementcomparedknowledgerelatedconfidenceperforminginfectionskillsperceptionpreparednesshigh-levelsatisfactionself-confidencelearningdifferencegroupsanxietyCONCLUSION:expectedstrategyalleviatingglobalburdensafetypatientoutcomesimprovingcompetenciesprospectiverespondingpandemicsEffectivenessSimulation-BasedCaringPatientsTheorySimulationTrainingStudents

Similar Articles

Cited By