Alexithymia characteristics are associated with salience network activity in healthy participants: an arterial spin labeling study.

Yuki Motomura, Ayaka Fukuzaki, Sanami Eto, Naoki Hirabayashi, Motoharu Gondo, Satoshi Izuno, Osamu Togao, Koji Yamashita, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Nobuyuki Sudo, Kazufumi Yoshihara
Author Information
  1. Yuki Motomura: Department of Human Life Design, Faculty of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minamiku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan. motomura@design.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
  2. Ayaka Fukuzaki: Department of Kansei Science, Graduate School of Integrated Frontier Science, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minamiku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.
  3. Sanami Eto: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  4. Naoki Hirabayashi: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  5. Motoharu Gondo: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  6. Satoshi Izuno: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  7. Osamu Togao: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  8. Koji Yamashita: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  9. Kazufumi Kikuchi: Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  10. Nobuyuki Sudo: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  11. Kazufumi Yoshihara: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alexithymia, a personality trait characterized by difficulties in identifying and expressing their emotions despite having a range of emotional experiences, can impact individuals' stress coping mechanisms. While many studies have investigated brain functions associated with specific tasks in relation to emotion processing, research focusing on resting-state brain functions has been limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between alexithymia and brain function by analyzing arterial spin labeling (ASL) data obtained during the resting state.
METHODS: A brain structural and functional imaging study was conducted on 42 healthy adult men and women using ASL and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) questionnaire survey. Cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity values were calculated for regions of interest in the default mode network, saliency network, and central executive network from the ASL data. Correlation analysis was performed with TAS20 scores, and partial correlation analysis was conducted to control for anxiety and depression.
RESULTS: The functional connectivity analysis revealed a negative correlation between the functional connectivity of the right insular cortex and left anterior cingulate cortex and the total score of TAS, as well as difficulty identifying feelings and difficulty describing feeling subscores, indicating that the higher the scores, the weaker the functional connectivity between these regions (T = -3.830, p = 0.0013, R = -0.5180). This correlation remained significant even after controlling for anxiety and depression using partial correlation analysis.
CONCLUSION: The present study revealed differences in the activity of the Saliency Network at rest as measured by ASL, which were independent of anxiety and depression, and varied depending on the severity of alexithymia. This functional change may underlie the neural basis of decreased emotional processing observed in alexithymia. These findings may contribute to the elucidation of the neural mechanisms of alexithymia, which can lead to social impairments, and suggest the usefulness of ASL measurement as a biomarker of alexithymia.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Neurosci. 2012 Sep;35(9):527-35 [PMID: 22658924]
  2. Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 01;6:1314 [PMID: 26388817]
  3. Psychol Assess. 2008 Dec;20(4):385-96 [PMID: 19086762]
  4. J Clin Psychol. 2007 Jan;63(1):109-17 [PMID: 17016830]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):533-44 [PMID: 15995724]
  6. Cortex. 2010 May;46(5):658-67 [PMID: 19524887]
  7. Psychother Psychosom. 2004 Mar-Apr;73(2):68-77 [PMID: 14767148]
  8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Sep;56:330-44 [PMID: 26234819]
  9. Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(6):363-70 [PMID: 20733346]
  10. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17(9):2223-34 [PMID: 17150987]
  11. J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1149-75 [PMID: 21241306]
  12. Nat Sci Sleep. 2021 Jun 28;13:899-921 [PMID: 34234596]
  13. J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 4;32(1):215-22 [PMID: 22219283]
  14. J Pers Assess. 2007 Dec;89(3):230-46 [PMID: 18001224]
  15. J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56 [PMID: 17329432]
  16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):483-506 [PMID: 21908230]
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):189-95 [PMID: 14730305]
  18. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Feb;9(2):148-58 [PMID: 18209732]
  19. Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):648-55 [PMID: 18406175]
  20. Biopsychosoc Med. 2007 Mar 06;1:7 [PMID: 17371586]
  21. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32 [PMID: 8126686]
  22. Psychother Psychosom. 2003 Nov-Dec;72(6):307-14 [PMID: 14526133]
  23. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27050 [PMID: 22073252]
  24. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Apr 12;14:991-998 [PMID: 29695908]
  25. Brain Behav. 2019 Feb;9(2):e01207 [PMID: 30644179]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):85-93 [PMID: 21167765]
  27. Biopsychosoc Med. 2013 Mar 28;7(1):8 [PMID: 23537323]
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70 [PMID: 19096369]
  29. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 09;14:2609-2615 [PMID: 30349259]
  30. J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14496-505 [PMID: 19923283]
  31. Psychosomatics. 2001 May-Jun;42(3):229-34 [PMID: 11351111]
  32. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):961-7 [PMID: 12042184]
  33. Psychosom Med. 2008 Jul;70(6):716-22 [PMID: 18596251]
  34. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Mar;34(3):598-612 [PMID: 22102377]
  35. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):1257-66 [PMID: 22248579]
  36. Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:111-22 [PMID: 25463468]
  37. Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):488-500 [PMID: 11848692]
  38. Compr Psychiatry. 2010 Mar-Apr;51(2):201-6 [PMID: 20152303]
  39. J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:51-56 [PMID: 30594024]

Grants

  1. 19K16244/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. JP19dm0307104/Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

MeSH Term

Adult
Male
Humans
Female
Affective Symptoms
Healthy Volunteers
Emotions
Anxiety
Brain

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0functionalalexithymiaASLnetworkAlexithymiabrainstudyconnectivityanalysiscorrelationcortexspinlabelinganxietydepressionidentifyingemotionalcanmechanismsfunctionsassociatedprocessingarterialdataconductedhealthyusingregionsscorespartialrevealedcingulatedifficultyactivitymayneuralBACKGROUND:personalitytraitcharacterizeddifficultiesexpressingemotionsdespiterangeexperiencesimpactindividuals'stresscopingmanystudiesinvestigatedspecifictasksrelationemotionresearchfocusingresting-statelimitedThusaiminvestigaterelationshipfunctionanalyzingobtainedrestingstateMETHODS:structuralimaging42adultmenwomen20-itemTorontoScaleTAS-20questionnairesurveyCerebralbloodflowvaluescalculatedinterestdefaultmodesaliencycentralexecutiveCorrelationperformedTAS20controlRESULTS:negativerightinsularleftanteriortotalscoreTASwellfeelingsdescribingfeelingsubscoresindicatinghigherweakerT = -3830p = 00013R = -05180remainedsignificantevencontrollingCONCLUSION:presentdifferencesSaliencyNetworkrestmeasuredindependentvarieddependingseveritychangeunderliebasisdecreasedobservedfindingscontributeelucidationleadsocialimpairmentssuggestusefulnessmeasurementbiomarkercharacteristicssalienceparticipants:AnteriorArterialInsularSaliencefMRI

Similar Articles

Cited By