Perception, attitudes, knowledge of using complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients among healthcare professionals: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Bo-Young Youn, Jie-Won Cha, Sungsu Cho, So-Mi Jeong, Hyo-Jung Kim, Seong-Gyu Ko
Author Information
  1. Bo-Young Youn: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  2. Jie-Won Cha: Department of Applied Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  3. Sungsu Cho: Department of Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  4. So-Mi Jeong: Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  5. Hyo-Jung Kim: Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  6. Seong-Gyu Ko: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the rapid increase in the prevalence of cancer worldwide, the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased among cancer patients. This review aimed to understand the perception, attitudes, and knowledge of healthcare professionals toward using CAM for cancer patients.
METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken in four databases. Inclusion criteria were primary studies reporting perception, attitudes, and knowledge of healthcare professionals for using CAM for cancer patients were eligible. A mixed-methods convergent synthesis was carried out, and the findings were subjected to a GRADE-CERQual assessment of confidence.
RESULTS: Forty-two studies were chosen. The majority of the studies were quantitative and had less than 100 participants. Most publications were from European countries, and oncology was the highest among the specialties. The review found the following themes: feasibility of having negative adverse effects, low expectations of using CAM among HCPs, potential positive effects of using CAM, specific CAM training may be helpful, no concrete regulations to promote CAM practice, and poor physician-patient communication.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses had more positive views than other professions; oncologists were concerned regarding herb-drug interactions; integration of CAM into the healthcare system was favorable; HCPs felt the need to participate in specific CAM training; and HCPs agreed that CAM education should be provided more regularly. Future studies should explore the studies views of cancer patients and details of in-depth evidence of CAM in oncology settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Aug;27:30-4 [PMID: 27515873]
  2. J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Apr;12(2):256-267 [PMID: 29222705]
  3. Curr Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(6):e436-61 [PMID: 23300368]
  4. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Mar 22;9:245 [PMID: 29623040]
  5. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Sep 1;44(5):553-561 [PMID: 28820508]
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0168123 [PMID: 27973611]
  7. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):118-24 [PMID: 24219109]
  8. Med Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;86(1):185-96 [PMID: 11799969]
  9. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Oct;28:29-36 [PMID: 27670867]
  10. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Aug;60:102743 [PMID: 34058368]
  11. Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 02;12:921151 [PMID: 36119472]
  12. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 May;19(2):70-6 [PMID: 23561063]
  13. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Feb 12;6:113-7 [PMID: 25709517]
  14. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Nov;103(2):111-5 [PMID: 18760411]
  15. Libyan J Med. 2022 Dec;17(1):2071813 [PMID: 35603591]
  16. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  17. Holist Nurs Pract. 2018 Mar/Apr;32(2):107-113 [PMID: 29432357]
  18. Cancer Control. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):404-10 [PMID: 15625528]
  19. CMAJ. 1996 Dec 15;155(12):1679-85 [PMID: 8976333]
  20. Can Fam Physician. 2004 Jun;50:882-8 [PMID: 15233371]
  21. Br J Nurs. 2014 Jan 9-22;23(1):40-6 [PMID: 24406495]
  22. Integr Cancer Ther. 2015 Nov;14(6):515-24 [PMID: 26069277]
  23. Psychooncology. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):453-9 [PMID: 9885086]
  24. Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;144(1):49-58 [PMID: 29978474]
  25. BMC Cancer. 2011 May 24;11:196 [PMID: 21609461]
  26. Behav Med. 2004 Summer;30(2):73-82 [PMID: 15648127]
  27. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223564 [PMID: 31622362]
  28. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):41 [PMID: 36750849]
  29. J Res Nurs. 2020 Jun;25(4):380-388 [PMID: 34394649]
  30. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  31. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2003 Dec;12(4):358-64 [PMID: 14982315]
  32. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):448-455 [PMID: 28975853]
  33. Complement Ther Med. 2002 Jun;10(2):100-6 [PMID: 12481958]
  34. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):7-14 [PMID: 30629900]
  35. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009 Mar;31(3):177-82 [PMID: 19262243]
  36. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 May 22;14:167 [PMID: 24885066]
  37. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:504507 [PMID: 23093982]
  38. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul;140(7):1229-37 [PMID: 24706260]
  39. Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):13440-13449 [PMID: 28088780]
  40. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:957082 [PMID: 23304230]
  41. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012 Sep;11(3):187-203 [PMID: 22019489]
  42. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jul 1;44(4):428-434 [PMID: 28632238]
  43. Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 28;10:594 [PMID: 32411599]
  44. Integr Cancer Ther. 2011 Sep;10(3):280-8 [PMID: 21498472]
  45. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Feb 13;21(1):63 [PMID: 33583417]
  46. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Mar;72(2):144-164 [PMID: 34751943]
  47. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):47-53 [PMID: 21835406]
  48. Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-1253 [PMID: 28464430]
  49. Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19149-19162 [PMID: 37676102]
  50. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Jun;17(2):451-457 [PMID: 28870099]
  51. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735418823266 [PMID: 30791736]
  52. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2023 May;40(4):352-362 [PMID: 36093792]
  53. Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Mar;15(1):10-6 [PMID: 26721796]
  54. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Dec;65(12):e27309 [PMID: 30051647]
  55. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000893 [PMID: 30775016]
  56. J Holist Nurs. 2019 Jun;37(2):130-139 [PMID: 30415595]
  57. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;296(2):295-301 [PMID: 28597400]
  58. Forsch Komplementmed. 2015;22(1):36-41 [PMID: 25824403]
  59. Complement Ther Med. 2019 Aug;45:205-210 [PMID: 31331562]
  60. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):545-6 [PMID: 26999670]
  61. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jul 25;8:499-503 [PMID: 28794663]
  62. Int J Med Educ. 2021 Jul 27;12:140-149 [PMID: 34323220]
  63. Scand J Caring Sci. 1998;12(2):119-26 [PMID: 9801633]
  64. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):217-24 [PMID: 19273411]
  65. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):347-54 [PMID: 16859867]
  66. Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2861-8 [PMID: 12767101]
  67. Tumori. 1996 Nov-Dec;82(6):539-42 [PMID: 9061060]
  68. Drug Saf. 2022 Jul;45(7):713-735 [PMID: 35788539]
  69. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008 Jun;7(2):70-5 [PMID: 18505899]
  70. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):967-980 [PMID: 33201377]
  71. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):703-8 [PMID: 16131295]
  72. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(1):24-31 [PMID: 30924749]
  73. Eur J Cancer. 2004 Mar;40(4):529-35 [PMID: 14962719]
  74. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:656812 [PMID: 22619692]

Grants

  1. 2020R1A5A2019413/National Research Foundation of Korea

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CAMcancerpatientsusingstudiesamongreviewhealthcarecomplementarymedicineperceptionattitudesknowledgemixed-methodsHCPsalternativeprofessionalssystematiconcologyeffectspositivespecifictrainingviewsBACKGROUND:rapidincreaseprevalenceworldwideutilizationincreasedaimedunderstandtowardMETHODS:undertakenfourdatabasesInclusioncriteriaprimaryreportingeligibleconvergentsynthesiscarriedfindingssubjectedGRADE-CERQualassessmentconfidenceRESULTS:Forty-twochosenmajorityquantitativeless100participantspublicationsEuropeancountrieshighestspecialtiesfoundfollowingthemes:feasibilitynegativeadverselowexpectationspotentialmayhelpfulconcreteregulationspromotepracticepoorphysician-patientcommunicationCONCLUSIONS:Nursesprofessionsoncologistsconcernedregardingherb-druginteractionsintegrationsystemfavorablefeltneedparticipateagreededucationprovidedregularlyFutureexploredetailsin-depthevidencesettingsPerceptionprofessionals:attitudebelief

Similar Articles

Cited By