Negotiated Rates for Surgical Cancer Care in the Era of Price Transparency-Prices Reflect Market Competition.

Danielle H Rochlin, Nada M Rizk, Evan Matros, Todd H Wagner, Clifford C Sheckter
Author Information
  1. Danielle H Rochlin: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY.
  2. Nada M Rizk: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
  3. Evan Matros: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY.
  4. Todd H Wagner: S-SPIRE. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  5. Clifford C Sheckter: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure commercial price variation for cancer surgery within and across hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Surgical care for solid-organ tumors is costly, and negotiated commercial rates have been hidden from public view. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule, enacted in 2021, requires all hospitals to list their negotiated rates on their website, thus opening the door for an examination of pricing for cancer surgery.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using 2021 negotiated price data disclosed by US hospitals for the 10 most common cancers treated with surgery. Price variation was measured using within-hospital and across-hospital ratios. Commercial rates relative to cancer center designation and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index at the facility level were evaluated with mixed effects linear regression with random intercepts per procedural code.
RESULTS: In all, 495,200 unique commercial rates from 2232 hospitals resulted for the 10 most common solid-organ tumor cancers. Gynecologic cancer operations had the highest median rates at $6035.8/operation compared with bladder cancer surgery at $3431.0/operation. Compared with competitive markets, moderately and highly concentrated markets were associated with significantly higher rates (HHI 1501, 2500, coefficient $513.6, 95% CI, $295.5, $731.7; HHI >2500, coefficient $1115.5, 95% CI, $913.7, $1317.2). National Cancer Institute designation was associated with higher rates, coefficient $3,451.9 (95% CI, $2853.2, $4050.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Commercial payer-negotiated prices for the surgical management of 10 common, solid tumor malignancies varied widely both within and across hospitals. Higher rates were observed in less competitive markets. Future efforts should facilitate price competition and limit health market concentration.

References

  1. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jun;32(6):1143-52 [PMID: 23676531]
  2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1277-1285 [PMID: 34339245]
  3. Radiology. 2022 Mar;302(3):622-624 [PMID: 34846206]
  4. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):689-696 [PMID: 28373335]
  5. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140526 [PMID: 34932108]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3495-3497 [PMID: 35029785]
  7. JAMA. 2021 Jun 4;: [PMID: 34086052]
  8. JAMA. 2013 Nov 13;310(18):1964-70 [PMID: 24219952]
  9. J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;120(1):85-92 [PMID: 30650186]
  10. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2821-6 [PMID: 21632508]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 31;373(27):2593-5 [PMID: 26580243]
  12. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):409-412 [PMID: 31944219]
  13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):54-61 [PMID: 26733701]
  14. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):603-611 [PMID: 35435948]
  15. JAMA Surg. 2023 Feb 1;158(2):152-160 [PMID: 36515928]
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3577-3584 [PMID: 34902095]
  17. JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):723-724 [PMID: 31329210]
  18. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):262-265 [PMID: 34582305]
  19. J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jan;12(1):44-7 [PMID: 26759467]
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33 [PMID: 35020204]
  21. Oncology (Williston Park). 2013 Feb;27(2):80-1, 149 [PMID: 23530397]
  22. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):298-299 [PMID: 30570655]
  23. J Health Econ. 2021 May;77:102423 [PMID: 33838593]
  24. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 May;20(2):e165-e172 [PMID: 32655908]
  25. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1903-1904 [PMID: 34709359]
  26. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):437-43 [PMID: 22138013]
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 1;152(3):476e-487e [PMID: 36847669]
  28. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1396-1397 [PMID: 34125138]
  29. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):644-653 [PMID: 29608370]
  30. Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106107 [PMID: 34517136]
  31. JAMA. 2021 Mar 2;325(9):817-818 [PMID: 33651096]

Grants

  1. KL2 TR003143/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
United States
Cross-Sectional Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospitals
Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ratescancerhospitalssurgerycommercialpricenegotiatedPrice10commonmarketscoefficient95%CI7variationwithinacrossSurgicalsolid-organ2021usingcancersCommercialdesignationtumorcompetitiveassociatedhigherHHI52CancerOBJECTIVE:measureBACKGROUND:caretumorscostlyhiddenpublicviewHospitalTransparencyRuleenactedrequireslistwebsitethusopeningdoorexaminationpricingMETHODS:cross-sectionalstudydatadisclosedUStreatedmeasuredwithin-hospitalacross-hospitalratiosrelativecenterHerfindahl-HirschmanIndexfacilitylevelevaluatedmixedeffectslinearregressionrandominterceptsperproceduralcodeRESULTS:495200unique2232resultedGynecologicoperationshighestmedian$60358/operationcomparedbladder$34310/operationComparedmoderatelyhighlyconcentratedsignificantly15012500$5136$295$731>2500$1115$913$1317NationalInstitute$34519$2853$4050CONCLUSIONS:payer-negotiatedpricessurgicalmanagementsolidmalignanciesvariedwidelyHigherobservedlessFutureeffortsfacilitatecompetitionlimithealthmarketconcentrationNegotiatedRatesCareEraTransparency-PricesReflectMarketCompetition

Similar Articles

Cited By