"Asking for help is a strength"-how to promote undergraduate medical students' teamwork through simulation training and interprofessional faculty.

Michaela Kolbe, J��rg Goldhahn, Mirdita Useini, Bastian Grande
Author Information
  1. Michaela Kolbe: Simulation Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. J��rg Goldhahn: Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  3. Mirdita Useini: Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Bastian Grande: Simulation Centre, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

The ability to team up and safely work in any kind of healthcare team is a critical asset and should be taught early on in medical education. Medical students should be given the chance to "walk the talk" of teamwork by training and reflecting in teams. Our goal was to design, implement and evaluate the feasibility of a simulation-based teamwork training (TeamSIM) for undergraduate medical students that puts generic teamwork skills centerstage. We designed TeamSIM to include 12 learning objectives. For this pre-post, mixed-methods feasibility study, third-year medical students, organized in teams of 11-12 students, participated and observed each other in eight simulations of different clinical situation with varying degrees of complexity (e.g., deteriorating patient in ward; trauma; resuscitation). Guided by an interprofessional clinical faculty with simulation-based instructor training, student teams reflected on their shared experience in structured team debriefings. Using published instruments, we measured (a) students' reactions to TeamSIM and their perceptions of psychological safety via self-report, (b) their ongoing reflections via experience sampling, and (c) their teamwork skills via behavior observation. Ninety four students participated. They reported positive reactions to TeamSIM (M���=���5.23, SD���=���0.5). Their mean initial reported level of psychological safety was M���=���3.8 (SD���=���0.4) which rose to M���=���4.3 (SD���=���0.5) toward the end of the course [T(21)���=���-2.8, 95% CI -0.78 to-0.12, ���=���0.011 (two-tailed)]. We obtained ���=���314 headline reflections from the students and ���=���95 from the faculty. For the students, the most frequent theme assigned to their headlines involved the concepts taught in the course such as "10���s for 10���min." For the faculty, the most frequent theme assigned to their headlines were reflections on how their simulation session worked for the students. The faculty rated students' teamwork skills higher after the last compared to the first debriefing. Undergraduate medical students can learn crucial teamwork skills in simulations supported by an experienced faculty and with a high degree of psychological safety. Both students and faculty appreciate the learning possibilities of simulation. At the same time, this learning can be challenging, intense and overwhelming. It takes a team to teach teamwork.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):45-50 [PMID: 10638536]
  2. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Mar 08;7(1):e106 [PMID: 37250989]
  3. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 May 11;13:485-494 [PMID: 35592356]
  4. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1010-6 [PMID: 18945231]
  5. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Feb 01;146:w14270 [PMID: 26829005]
  6. Simul Healthc. 2011 Feb;6(1):2-3 [PMID: 21330843]
  7. BMJ. 2021 Sep 13;374:n2042 [PMID: 34518169]
  8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):619-622 [PMID: 32066572]
  9. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 9;4(3):133-140 [PMID: 35520465]
  10. Med Educ. 2020 Jun;54(6):559-570 [PMID: 32170881]
  11. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):90-103 [PMID: 19186898]
  12. J Appl Psychol. 2022 Apr;107(4):650-667 [PMID: 34264706]
  13. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Nov;129(5):776-787 [PMID: 36075775]
  14. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236085 [PMID: 32730277]
  15. Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1555-1563 [PMID: 28445215]
  16. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Nov 26;7(1):39 [PMID: 36435851]
  17. Simul Healthc. 2022 Oct 1;17(5):283-292 [PMID: 34839303]
  18. Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Feb 5;7(1):5 [PMID: 35123580]
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 May 07;91:104468 [PMID: 32454316]
  20. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 28;10:1478 [PMID: 31316435]
  21. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 May 24;7(6):605-610 [PMID: 35520973]
  22. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jun 1;5(3):130-139 [PMID: 35514943]
  23. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Jun 2;7(3):176-177 [PMID: 35518559]
  24. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2020 Sep;109(11):853-858 [PMID: 32873161]
  25. Acad Med. 2017 Aug;92(8):1114-1120 [PMID: 28562455]
  26. Med Teach. 2018 Jul;40(7):703-712 [PMID: 29792100]
  27. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):55-60 [PMID: 31743312]
  28. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):295 [PMID: 27852293]
  29. Simul Healthc. 2023 Jun 1;18(3):191-202 [PMID: 35921616]
  30. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Mar 8;7(5):452-453 [PMID: 35515715]
  31. Acad Radiol. 2019 Jan;26(1):101-113 [PMID: 30929697]
  32. MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jan 21;10:18 [PMID: 38486533]
  33. Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49 [PMID: 25188485]
  34. Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):52-60 [PMID: 29076968]
  35. Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Sep;31(9):932-943 [PMID: 34096658]
  36. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):846-53 [PMID: 18386100]
  37. Pediatrics. 2015 Sep;136(3):487-95 [PMID: 26260718]
  38. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 22;10:679-688 [PMID: 31686942]
  39. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jan;30(1):59-63 [PMID: 32471858]
  40. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 9;4(3):126-132 [PMID: 35520468]
  41. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Jun;25(2):361-76 [PMID: 17574196]
  42. Simul Healthc. 2016 Feb;11(1):32-40 [PMID: 26836466]
  43. MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Dec 6;18:11283 [PMID: 36568036]
  44. Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1105-24 [PMID: 22722354]
  45. Med Educ. 2004 Jan;38(1):32-8 [PMID: 14962024]
  46. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):541-53 [PMID: 23525093]
  47. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e028280 [PMID: 31515415]
  48. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 20;6(3):164-171 [PMID: 35518370]
  49. Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):309-318 [PMID: 34641741]
  50. Med Teach. 2023 Dec;45(12):1349-1356 [PMID: 37210674]
  51. Med Educ. 2020 Mar;54(3):264-274 [PMID: 31954079]
  52. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;125(6):1099-1106 [PMID: 32943191]
  53. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):2011-2022 [PMID: 31889359]
  54. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 May;45(5):358-367 [PMID: 30904328]
  55. J Interprof Care. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):187-202 [PMID: 35403551]
  56. Health Policy. 2021 Mar;125(3):375-384 [PMID: 33526279]
  57. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):3-7 [PMID: 34776122]
  58. Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Nov 8;6(1):40 [PMID: 34749833]
  59. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 16;7(1):3-10 [PMID: 35521075]
  60. Simul Healthc. 2013 Oct;8(5):304-16 [PMID: 24084647]
  61. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222461 [PMID: 31514203]
  62. J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):127-135 [PMID: 29172791]
  63. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):529-44 [PMID: 23454826]
  64. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):125-128 [PMID: 36323510]
  65. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 May 21;7(1):54-57 [PMID: 35521082]
  66. J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):239-46 [PMID: 25873056]
  67. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):334 [PMID: 31488113]
  68. Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Mar 31;8(1):11 [PMID: 37004091]
  69. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):449-52 [PMID: 23704117]
  70. J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1266-304 [PMID: 27599089]
  71. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Sep;31(9):638-641 [PMID: 35428683]
  72. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):971-980 [PMID: 34511257]
  73. Med Educ. 2023 Feb;57(2):161-169 [PMID: 36151727]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentsteamworkfacultymedicaltrainingTeamSIMteamskillssafetysimulationteamslearningstudents'psychologicalviareflectionsSD���=���0healthcaretaughteducationfeasibilitysimulation-basedundergraduate12participatedsimulationsclinicalpatientinterprofessionalexperiencereactionsreported58coursefrequentthemeassignedheadlinescanabilitysafelyworkkindcriticalassetearlyMedicalgivenchance"walktalk"reflectinggoaldesignimplementevaluateputsgenericcenterstagedesignedincludeobjectivespre-postmixed-methodsstudythird-yearorganized11-12observedeightdifferentsituationvaryingdegreescomplexityegdeterioratingwardtraumaresuscitationGuidedinstructorstudentreflectedsharedstructureddebriefingsUsingpublishedinstrumentsmeasuredperceptionsself-reportbongoingsamplingcbehaviorobservationNinetyfourpositiveM���=���523meaninitiallevelM���=���34roseM���=���43towardend[T21���=���-295%CI-078to-0���=���0011two-tailed]obtained���=���314headline���=���95involvedconcepts"10���s10���min"sessionworkedratedhigherlastcomparedfirstdebriefingUndergraduatelearncrucialsupportedexperiencedhighdegreeappreciatepossibilitiestimechallengingintenseoverwhelmingtakesteach"Askinghelpstrength"-howpromote

Similar Articles

Cited By