A phenomenological study of compassion satisfaction among social work educators in higher education.

Sultan A Shubair, Ben Miller, Jean Zelenko
Author Information
  1. Sultan A Shubair: Social Studies Department, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Ben Miller: Raymond A. Kent School of Social Work and Family Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
  3. Jean Zelenko: Raymond A. Kent School of Social Work and Family Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.

Abstract

Background: Compassion satisfaction (CS) is a phenomenon that has been studied among the helping professions, such as nursing and social work and has been linked to stress, burnout, compassion fatigue, and vicarious trauma. Social work educators may also experience these same issues, yet more research is needed on how they might counter the negative impacts associated with this type of work by utilizing their experiences of CS.
Objectives: A phenomenological study was carried out to explore and describe how social work educators in higher education experiences CS.
Methods: Eleven in-depth interviews with social work educators were conducted, and constructivist grounded theory techniques were utilized to analyze the data.
Results: Social work educators experienced CS within the education and personal realms, which encompassed four different elements: achievement, support, balance, and empathy.
Discussion: The four elements of CS were utilized by social work educators in this study as coping strategies to enhance their experience of CS, thus encountering threats to CS, such as institutional barriers, interaction with administrators and colleagues, and work overload.
Conclusion: Interventions fostering compassion satisfaction and reducing compassion fatigue, burnout, and stress should be considered, including interventions that increase the sense of accomplishment, promote holistic self-care, encourage administrative and collegial support, and improve work-life balance.

Keywords

References

  1. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2009 Apr;52(3):215-29 [PMID: 19308828]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Apr;75:80-94 [PMID: 30739841]
  3. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2017 Apr-Sep;13(2-3):134-150 [PMID: 28426395]
  4. Soc Work. 2015 Jul;60(3):201-9 [PMID: 26173361]
  5. Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20 [PMID: 19673146]
  6. Nurs Forum. 2018 Jan;53(1):76-83 [PMID: 28662300]
  7. Nurs Adm Q. 2019 Oct/Dec;43(4):358-369 [PMID: 31479058]
  8. J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1294-1304 [PMID: 34510523]
  9. Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Oct;30(10):1071-80 [PMID: 17014908]
  10. J Nurs Manag. 2014 May;22(4):519-31 [PMID: 24926496]
  11. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(2):101-19 [PMID: 19042895]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workCSsocialeducatorscompassioneducationsatisfactionstudyhighersupportamongstressburnoutfatigueSocialexperienceexperiencesphenomenologicalutilizedfourbalanceself-careBackground:CompassionphenomenonstudiedhelpingprofessionsnursinglinkedvicarioustraumamayalsoissuesyetresearchneededmightcounternegativeimpactsassociatedtypeutilizingObjectives:carriedexploredescribeMethods:Elevenin-depthinterviewsconductedconstructivistgroundedtheorytechniquesanalyzedataResults:experiencedwithinpersonalrealmsencompasseddifferentelements:achievementempathyDiscussion:elementscopingstrategiesenhancethusencounteringthreatsinstitutionalbarriersinteractionadministratorscolleaguesoverloadConclusion:Interventionsfosteringreducingconsideredincludinginterventionsincreasesenseaccomplishmentpromoteholisticencourageadministrativecollegialimprovework-life

Similar Articles

Cited By