Development of a Core Set of Quality Criteria for Virtual Reality Applications Designed for Older Adults: Multistep Qualitative Study.

Alina Napetschnig, Klara Brixius, Wolfgang Deiters
Author Information
  1. Alina Napetschnig: Department of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany. ORCID
  2. Klara Brixius: Institut für Kreislaufforschung und Sportmedizin, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Cologne, Germany. ORCID
  3. Wolfgang Deiters: Department of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) applications are gaining growing significance, particularly among older adults. These applications can provide valuable support to older adults by offering immersive VR content that positively influences various aspects of their daily lives, including activities of daily living. Furthermore, VR applications can contribute to the enhancement of cognitive and motor skills, ultimately leading to an improved quality of life for older individuals. Nevertheless, to ensure a positive impact, it is crucial to develop VR experiences that are tailored to the needs and preferences of the users.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a core set of quality criteria and guidelines for the development of user-centered VR applications specifically designed for older adults (target group).
METHODS: The multistep qualitative study design comprised several key stages, beginning with a systematic literature search. This was followed by a framework analysis aimed at identifying a core set of criteria. Subsequently, these criteria underwent validation through expert workshops. The outcomes achieved through this iterative process were organized and categorized into criteria, accompanied by explanations detailing the underlying categories or codes.
RESULTS: The quality criteria core set for older adults-friendly VR applications has been developed through an iterative process. It is divided into 2 distinct parts, each containing criteria categorized into specific areas. The first part includes the following categories: (1) quality assurance of medical/health content, (2) data protection provisions, (3) quality requirements, (4) consumer protection, and (5) interoperability. The second part includes the following categories: (1) graphic/quality, (2) 3D character/avatar, (3) providing in-game instructions and prompts, (4) interaction, (5) navigation, and (6) promotion of user motivation and loyalty to use. The results imply a differentiated scope as well as a differentiated granularity of the criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the ongoing advancement of VR technology and the diverse needs within the older adult demographic, it is essential to assess the quality criteria core set results on an individual basis.

Keywords

References

  1. Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 Aug 25;2020:7108147 [PMID: 32908580]
  2. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 26;15(1):113 [PMID: 30477527]
  3. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):835-8 [PMID: 25528930]
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 1;22(6):e17331 [PMID: 32478662]
  5. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 02;5(2):e81 [PMID: 27256457]
  6. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Feb;56(1):47-57 [PMID: 31615196]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64 [PMID: 19622511]
  8. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 8;266:63-69 [PMID: 31397303]
  9. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Dec 09;13:734012 [PMID: 34955806]
  10. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 May;65(3):101592 [PMID: 34662734]
  11. JMIR Serious Games. 2017 Aug 25;5(3):e18 [PMID: 28842390]
  12. J Neurosci Nurs. 2019 Apr;51(2):101-105 [PMID: 30649091]
  13. Science. 1987 Jul 10;237(4811):143-9 [PMID: 3299702]
  14. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 06;9:2086 [PMID: 30459681]
  15. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 02;13:342 [PMID: 31632256]
  16. Front Robot AI. 2020 Oct 22;7:495468 [PMID: 33501294]
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 21;19(3):e82 [PMID: 28325712]
  18. Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(14):2393-2400 [PMID: 28325167]
  19. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 22;21(1):e12959 [PMID: 30668519]
  20. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;22(16): [PMID: 36015929]
  21. J Healthc Eng. 2018 Aug 30;2018:1930357 [PMID: 30245783]
  22. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27 [PMID: 25760773]
  23. JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jan 31;6(1):e11973 [PMID: 30702436]
  24. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Nov 2;13(1):96 [PMID: 27806718]
  25. Innov Aging. 2021 Jul 01;5(2):igab014 [PMID: 34632105]
  26. Maturitas. 2020 Sep;139:6-11 [PMID: 32747042]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0criteriaVRolderqualityapplicationsadultscoreset2Virtualrealitycancontentdailydevelopneedsstudyuser-centerediterativeprocesscategorizedpartincludesfollowingcategories:1protection345resultsdifferentiatedBACKGROUND:gaininggrowingsignificanceparticularlyamongprovidevaluablesupportofferingimmersivepositivelyinfluencesvariousaspectslivesincludingactivitieslivingFurthermorecontributeenhancementcognitivemotorskillsultimatelyleadingimprovedlifeindividualsNeverthelessensurepositiveimpactcrucialexperiencestailoredpreferencesusersOBJECTIVE:aimsguidelinesdevelopmentspecificallydesignedtargetgroupMETHODS:multistepqualitativedesigncomprisedseveralkeystagesbeginningsystematicliteraturesearchfollowedframeworkanalysisaimedidentifyingSubsequentlyunderwentvalidationexpertworkshopsoutcomesachievedorganizedaccompaniedexplanationsdetailingunderlyingcategoriescodesRESULTS:adults-friendlydevelopeddivideddistinctpartscontainingspecificareasfirstassurancemedical/healthdataprovisionsrequirementsconsumerinteroperabilitysecondgraphic/quality3Dcharacter/avatarprovidingin-gameinstructionspromptsinteractionnavigation6promotionusermotivationloyaltyuseimplyscopewellgranularityCONCLUSIONS:ConsideringongoingadvancementtechnologydiversewithinadultdemographicessentialassessindividualbasisDevelopmentCoreSetQualityCriteriaRealityApplicationsDesignedOlderAdults:MultistepQualitativeStudyvirtual

Similar Articles

Cited By