The Usefulness of the Ratio of Antigen-Autoantibody Immune Complexes to Their Free Antigens in the Diagnosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Heyjin Kim, Jin Kyung Lee, Ae-Chin Oh, Hye-Ryoun Kim, Young Jun Hong
Author Information
  1. Heyjin Kim: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  2. Jin Kyung Lee: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
  3. Ae-Chin Oh: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
  4. Hye-Ryoun Kim: Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
  5. Young Jun Hong: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea. ORCID

Abstract

Autoantibodies against specific lung cancer-associated antigens have been suggested for the performance of lung cancer diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the antigen-autoantibody immune complex (AIC) against its free antigens for CYFRA21-1, ProGRP, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 85 patients with NSCLC and 120 healthy controls (HCs) were examined using a 9-guanine DNA chip method. The ratios of AICs to their antigens and the combinations of ratios consisting of two to four markers were calculated. The levels of AICs for CYFRA21-1, ProGRP, NGAL, and NSE were higher than those for their free antigens in all participants. The levels of each free antigens distinguished patients with NSCLC from the HCs. The ratios of the AIC to its antigen and seven combinations of two to four ratios were significantly higher in patients with NSCLC than in the HCs. Excellent diagnostic performance was observed for all combination ratios (C4-1), with 85.9% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity at a 3.51 cut-off. Higher sensitivity was observed in the early stages (0-I) and adenocarcinoma than in stages II-IV and other pathological types. Combining all ratios of AICs and their antigens for all four markers was useful when diagnosing NSCLC.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Feb;12(2):136-43 [PMID: 12582023]
  2. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017 Sep;9(9):599-609 [PMID: 29081843]
  3. Nat Immunol. 2002 Nov;3(11):991-8 [PMID: 12407406]
  4. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58001 [PMID: 23472128]
  5. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51(6):2631-2646 [PMID: 30562746]
  6. Chest. 1995 Jul;108(1):163-9 [PMID: 7541742]
  7. Int J Oncol. 2016 Jan;48(1):84-98 [PMID: 26573874]
  8. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 30;12(11): [PMID: 33143045]
  9. Autoimmun Rev. 2016 May;15(5):477-83 [PMID: 26827909]
  10. Cancer Res. 2000 Apr 1;60(7):1815-7 [PMID: 10766164]
  11. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):80-92 [PMID: 33569295]
  12. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:3762651 [PMID: 28642804]
  13. Lung Cancer. 2021 Aug;158:85-90 [PMID: 34130044]
  14. Lung. 2001;179(1):57-65 [PMID: 11479694]
  15. J Proteome Res. 2017 Jan 6;16(1):3-13 [PMID: 27769114]
  16. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:531-542 [PMID: 31099633]
  17. Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;12(2): [PMID: 35200387]
  18. Ann Oncol. 2011 Feb;22(2):383-9 [PMID: 20675559]
  19. Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Oct;2(10):1767-75 [PMID: 9816128]
  20. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 15;22(22): [PMID: 34830212]
  21. Chem Commun (Camb). 2019 Aug 20;55(68):10060-10063 [PMID: 31328750]
  22. Cancers (Basel). 2017 Nov 13;9(11): [PMID: 29137182]
  23. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1763-71 [PMID: 17065637]
  24. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 22;15(13): [PMID: 37444393]
  25. J Proteome Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;4(4):1123-33 [PMID: 16083262]
  26. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017 Nov 28;8:231-240 [PMID: 29238236]
  27. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Jun;4(3):275-86 [PMID: 26207215]
  28. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 May;6(5):955-62 [PMID: 21415775]
  29. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:116-128 [PMID: 28919484]
  30. JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987 [PMID: 33687468]
  31. BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 21;20(1):137 [PMID: 32085733]
  32. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 1;90(11):2097-105 [PMID: 15150567]
  33. Thorax. 2008 Mar;63(3):228-33 [PMID: 17932110]
  34. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11805 [PMID: 34083687]
  35. Cancer Biomark. 2010;6(3-4):163-78 [PMID: 20660962]
  36. Anticancer Res. 2005 May-Jun;25(3A):1773-8 [PMID: 16033098]
  37. Cell Death Discov. 2019 Aug 5;5:126 [PMID: 31396403]
  38. Lung Cancer. 2001 Apr;32(1):61-9 [PMID: 11282430]
  39. Immunol Rev. 2008 Apr;222:328-40 [PMID: 18364012]
  40. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jul;1(6):513-9 [PMID: 17409910]

Grants

  1. 20003670/Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0antigensratioslungNSCLCcancerperformancefreeCYFRA21-1ProGRPNGALNSEpatientsHCsAICsfourdiagnosticAICnon-smallcell85combinationstwomarkerslevelshigherobservedsensitivitystagesAutoantibodiesspecificcancer-associatedsuggesteddiagnosisstudyaimedevaluateantigen-autoantibodyimmunecomplexneutrophilgelatinase-associatedlipocalinneuron-specificenolasetotal120healthycontrolsexaminedusing9-guanineDNAchipmethodconsistingcalculatedparticipantsdistinguishedantigensevensignificantlyExcellentcombinationC4-19%867%specificity351cut-offHigherearly0-IadenocarcinomaII-IVpathologicaltypesCombiningusefuldiagnosingUsefulnessRatioAntigen-AutoantibodyImmuneComplexesFreeAntigensDiagnosisNon-SmallCellLungCancerautoantibodybiomarker

Similar Articles

Cited By