Validation of publication pressure questionnaire-revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital.

Xinxue Xi, Jing Mao, Tieying Zeng, Dandan Ju
Author Information
  1. Xinxue Xi: Nursing Department of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. ORCID
  2. Jing Mao: School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  3. Tieying Zeng: Nursing Department of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  4. Dandan Ju: School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Abstract

AIMS: To translate and validate the Publication Pressure Questionnaire-revised (PPQ-r) among the Chinese nurses.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study.
METHODS: The classical forward/backward translation of the PPQ-r was conducted first, and then the psychometric values were tested using the data collected in September, 2021 among 924 Chinese nurses from a university hospital in China by calculating its content validity index, construct validity, both convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency reliability following the COSMIN guidelines.
RESULTS: The proposed three-factor structure of original PPQ-r cannot be confirmed in present study. With exploratory factor analysis, a new two-factor structure with 9 items was extracted, accounting for 62.718% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated satisfactory goodness of all fit index values: χ  = 75.53; df = 23; χ /df = 3.28; CFI = 0.973; TLI = 0.958; RMSEA = 0.07 and SRMR = 0.047. Both sub-scales yielded good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha being 0.845 and 0.876, respectively. The Chinese version of PPQ-r could be accepted as a reliable and valid tool to measure the Chinese nurses' publication pressure.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participation of nurses in this study was limited to the data provided through participant survey.

Keywords

References

  1. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Jan-Mar;81(1):45-48 [PMID: 29562377]
  2. Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):2941-2942 [PMID: 30392678]
  3. World Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;91:616-7 [PMID: 27020969]
  4. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1028 [PMID: 31602017]
  5. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):352-355 [PMID: 31572081]
  6. Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1748 [PMID: 31428015]
  7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 [PMID: 17161752]
  8. Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7713-7724 [PMID: 37775963]
  9. Am J Nurs. 2020 Aug;120(8):50-55 [PMID: 32732482]
  10. Indian J Community Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;46(4):584-586 [PMID: 35068714]
  11. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):2 [PMID: 29291733]
  12. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):74-82 [PMID: 30915714]
  13. Tomography. 2022 Jul 19;8(4):1851-1853 [PMID: 35894020]
  14. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512 [PMID: 11419809]
  15. Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):382-8 [PMID: 16904796]
  16. Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2055-62 [PMID: 24522963]
  17. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):1-5 [PMID: 23623744]
  18. J Postgrad Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;64(4):226-231 [PMID: 30306968]
  19. Clin Nurse Spec. 2019 Mar/Apr;33(2):90-96 [PMID: 30730453]
  20. Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Oct-Dec;3(4):344-345 [PMID: 30121560]
  21. Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):61-70 [PMID: 31315454]
  22. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217931 [PMID: 31216293]
  23. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Apr 09;4:7 [PMID: 31007948]
  24. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 19;47(6):2437-8 [PMID: 23461664]
  25. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):e9-e11 [PMID: 36460485]
  26. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):617-619 [PMID: 29350352]
  27. Nature. 2016 May 11;533(7602):147 [PMID: 27172010]
  28. J Bus Ethics. 2023;183(2):619-636 [PMID: 35125566]
  29. Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):784 [PMID: 16482133]

Grants

  1. 202036/Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translating
Hospitals, University

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ChinesenursesPPQ-rstudypressurevaliditypublicationamongdatauniversityhospitalChinaindexinternalconsistencystructurefactoranalysisχ0AIMS:translatevalidatePublicationPressureQuestionnaire-revisedDESIGN:cross-sectionaldescriptiveMETHODS:classicalforward/backwardtranslationconductedfirstpsychometricvaluestestedusingcollectedSeptember2021924calculatingcontentconstructconvergentdiscriminantreliabilityfollowingCOSMINguidelinesRESULTS:proposedthree-factororiginalconfirmedpresentexploratorynewtwo-factor9itemsextractedaccounting62718%varianceConfirmatoryindicatedsatisfactorygoodnessfitvalues: = 7553df = 23/df = 328CFI = 0973TLI = 0958RMSEA = 007SRMR = 0047sub-scalesyieldedgoodCronbach'salpha845876respectivelyversionacceptedreliablevalidtoolmeasurenurses'PATIENTORPUBLICCONTRIBUTION:ParticipationlimitedprovidedparticipantsurveyValidationquestionnaire-revisedresearchvalidation

Similar Articles

Cited By