Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.

Zain Aryanpour, Dominic Min-Tran, Essie Ghafoor, Christopher Wojcik, Blair R Peters
Author Information
  1. Zain Aryanpour: is a PGY-2 Resident, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus.
  2. Dominic Min-Tran: is a Fourth-Year Medical Student, University of Washington School of Medicine. ORCID
  3. Essie Ghafoor: is a Fourth-Year Medical Student, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Medicine. ORCID
  4. Christopher Wojcik: is a PGY-2 Resident, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus; and. ORCID
  5. Blair R Peters: is Assistant Professor, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, and Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University.

Abstract

Resident physicians take annual in-service examinations (ISEs) as part of continuing medical education, which set educational priorities, allow for formative feedback, and guide preparation for final board examinations. Gender-affirming care is provided in many specialties but has been an underrepresented area in medical education. Plastic surgeons provide a large portion of gender-affirming surgical care. Educational gaps in standardized ISEs may contribute to ongoing health care disparities for transgender and gender diverse people. To evaluate the quality of content pertaining to gender-affirming surgery (GAS) on plastic surgery ISEs. Plastic surgery ISEs from years 2012 to 2020 were accessed online through the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website in June 2022. All 5 gender diverse authors analyzed examinations for the presence of GAS questions; identified questions were analyzed for quantity, organization based on content category, affirming language, and accuracy against current guidelines. Of 1959 ISE questions available for review, 11 GAS questions were identified for a total frequency of 0.56%. Most GAS questions (6 of 11, 55%) were miscategorized. Inappropriate language, including misgendering of patients, occurred in 7 of 11 (64%) questions. No questions discussed GAS beyond chest or genital surgery, or common variations of these procedures. Transgender identities were represented as only binary, with no mention of nonbinary or gender-fluid individuals. Our study illustrates that there are significant gaps in educational content pertaining to gender-affirming care on plastic surgery ISEs.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 24;387(21):1916-1918 [PMID: 36409476]
  2. J Surg Educ. 2016 May-Jun;73(3):375-80 [PMID: 26861580]
  3. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Aug;35(6):739-45 [PMID: 26229130]
  4. Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jun 1;88(5 Suppl 5):S478-S480 [PMID: 35690942]
  5. Med J Aust. 2020 Mar;212(4):150-151.e1 [PMID: 32030758]
  6. Ann Fam Med. 2023 Feb;21(Suppl 2):S92-S94 [PMID: 36849474]
  7. Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18;35(5):576-581 [PMID: 29236982]
  8. Transgend Health. 2019 Nov 21;4(1):335-338 [PMID: 31754631]
  9. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Jun;8(3):184-190 [PMID: 31380225]
  10. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Mar;25(3):105-111 [PMID: 36773177]
  11. JAMA Surg. 2018 Jul 1;153(7):609-616 [PMID: 29490365]
  12. MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Apr 03;16:10896 [PMID: 32352033]
  13. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5S Suppl 4):S323-S328 [PMID: 32032108]
  14. Transgend Health. 2022 Feb 14;7(1):30-35 [PMID: 36644026]
  15. Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):924-930 [PMID: 34404544]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):135e-153e [PMID: 33370073]
  17. Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Sep 6;23(Suppl 1):S1-S259 [PMID: 36238954]
  18. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Mar;6(1 Suppl 1):222-4 [PMID: 24701285]
  19. Horm Res Paediatr. 2022;95(6):649-656 [PMID: 36446328]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 16;6(4):e1738 [PMID: 29876180]
  21. LGBT Health. 2020 Aug/Sep;7(6):292-304 [PMID: 32493100]

MeSH Term

Humans
United States
Surgery, Plastic
Internship and Residency
Transgender Persons
Gender-Affirming Surgery
Healthcare Disparities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0questionsISEssurgeryGAScarePlasticexaminationsgender-affirmingcontent11medicaleducationeducationalgapsgenderdiversepertainingplasticanalyzedidentifiedlanguageResidentphysicianstakeannualin-servicepartcontinuingsetprioritiesallowformativefeedbackguidepreparationfinalboardGender-affirmingprovidedmanyspecialtiesunderrepresentedareasurgeonsprovidelargeportionsurgicalEducationalstandardizedmaycontributeongoinghealthdisparitiestransgenderpeopleevaluatequalityyears20122020accessedonlineAmericanCouncilAcademicSurgeonswebsiteJune20225authorspresencequantityorganizationbasedcategoryaffirmingaccuracycurrentguidelines1959ISEavailablereviewtotalfrequency056%655%miscategorizedInappropriateincludingmisgenderingpatientsoccurred764%discussedbeyondchestgenitalcommonvariationsproceduresTransgenderidentitiesrepresentedbinarymentionnonbinarygender-fluidindividualsstudyillustratessignificantTeachingEvidence-BasedInclusivePracticesGender-AffirmingCare?PerspectivesSurgeryIn-ServiceExaminations

Similar Articles

Cited By