Changes of Serum Pyruvate Kinase M2 Level in Patients with Sepsis and Its Clinical Value.

Li Wang, Dongling Tang, Pingan Zhang
Author Information
  1. Li Wang: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Translational Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  2. Dongling Tang: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Translational Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  3. Pingan Zhang: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Translational Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430060, People's Republic of China. ORCID

Abstract

Purpose: The glucose metabolic reprogramming is an important pathological mechanism in sepsis, which involves a series of enzymes including Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2). The purpose of this study is to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum PKM2 in sepsis patients.
Patients and Methods: This study recruited 143 sepsis patients, 91 non-sepsis patients, and 65 physical examiners, divided into sepsis group, non-sepsis group, and control group. Measure the serum PKM2 concentration of subjects, collect and analyze clinical and laboratory indicators of all subjects. Independent risk factors were selected by Logistic regression analysis. The area under curve (AUC) was calculated by plotting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of biomarkers.
Results: Compared with non-sepsis and control groups, the serum PKM2 levels in the sepsis group were significantly increased (both <0.001). PKM2 was an independent risk factor for sepsis and had the best diagnostic efficacy when combined with procalcitonin, with the AUC value of 0.9352. Patients with high levels of PKM2 were more likely to experience organ damage and had a higher incidence of septic shock. On the 1st and 3rd days of admission, the serum PKM2 levels in the septic shock group were higher than those in the sepsis group (both <0.05), with AUC values of 0.7296 and 0.6247, respectively. On the 3rd and 7th days of admission, the serum PKM2 levels in the non-survival group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (both <0.001), with AUC values of 0.7033 and 0.8732, respectively.
Conclusion: The serum PKM2 levels in sepsis patients are significantly increased and correlated with disease severity and clinical outcomes. PKM2 may be a new diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for sepsis.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Biol Sci. 2022 Oct 24;18(16):6210-6225 [PMID: 36439872]
  2. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 [PMID: 26903338]
  3. J Clin Med. 2021 May 29;10(11): [PMID: 34072402]
  4. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Jul;104(4):573-585 [PMID: 32505253]
  5. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(10):2816-2828 [PMID: 32047926]
  6. Mol Immunol. 2021 Dec;140:250-266 [PMID: 34798593]
  7. Brain Behav Immun. 2018 Aug;72:89-100 [PMID: 29109024]
  8. Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 25;7:13280 [PMID: 27779186]
  9. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1057229 [PMID: 36438808]
  10. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019 Nov 1;143:176-192 [PMID: 31401304]
  11. Virol Sin. 2021 Dec;36(6):1532-1542 [PMID: 34519916]
  12. Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 02;10:159 [PMID: 32195169]
  13. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022 Jul 29;79(8):456 [PMID: 35904600]
  14. Gut. 2022 Dec;71(12):2539-2550 [PMID: 35140065]
  15. Cell Chem Biol. 2022 Aug 18;29(8):1248-1259.e6 [PMID: 35858615]
  16. J Gen Physiol. 1927 Mar 7;8(6):519-30 [PMID: 19872213]
  17. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):92-102 [PMID: 34902047]
  18. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Feb;79:106048 [PMID: 31863924]
  19. Semin Immunopathol. 2017 Jul;39(5):517-528 [PMID: 28555385]
  20. Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75-87 [PMID: 29937192]
  21. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Aug;121:110401 [PMID: 37302371]
  22. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 09;12:801232 [PMID: 35223539]
  23. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247 [PMID: 34599691]
  24. Clin Biochem. 2018 Mar;53:19-24 [PMID: 29273328]
  25. JAMA. 2017 Feb 28;317(8):807-808 [PMID: 28114630]
  26. Biomed J. 2022 Aug;45(4):665-674 [PMID: 34482015]
  27. Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211 [PMID: 31954465]
  28. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 24;12:779787 [PMID: 34899740]
  29. Pathogens. 2021 Jun 22;10(7): [PMID: 34206267]
  30. Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 25;12:748573 [PMID: 34759927]
  31. Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1493-1502 [PMID: 33058814]
  32. EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104394 [PMID: 36470834]
  33. Fitoterapia. 2021 Jul;152:104922 [PMID: 33984439]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PKM2sepsisgroupserumlevels0diagnosticpatientsAUCprognosticvaluenon-sepsissignificantly<0higherglucosemetabolicreprogrammingPyruvateM2studycontrolsubjectsclinicalriskcurveincreased001Patientssepticshock3rddaysadmissionvaluesrespectivelyPurpose:importantpathologicalmechanisminvolvesseriesenzymesincludingkinasepurposeexplorePatientsMethods:recruited1439165physicalexaminersdividedMeasureconcentrationcollectanalyzelaboratoryindicatorsIndependentfactorsselectedLogisticregressionanalysisareacalculatedplottingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicROCdeterminebiomarkersResults:Comparedgroupsindependentfactorbestefficacycombinedprocalcitonin9352highlikelyexperienceorgandamageincidence1st05729662477thnon-survivalsurvival70338732Conclusion:correlateddiseaseseverityoutcomesmaynewbiomarkerChangesSerumKinaseLevelSepsisClinicalValuediagnosisprognosis

Similar Articles

Cited By