Utilization of Norwegian crisis shelters before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Valborg Baste, Inger Haukenes, Tone Morken, Bente E Moen, Kjersti Alsaker
Author Information
  1. Valborg Baste: National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway. ORCID
  2. Inger Haukenes: Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  3. Tone Morken: National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
  4. Bente E Moen: Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  5. Kjersti Alsaker: National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The measures introduced to control the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and physical distancing, exerted considerable influence on society.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine (1) the prevalence of people seeking Norwegian crisis shelters for domestic violence during the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) compared to the year before, (2) the demography and type of violence among first-time visitors and (3) to compare the utilization of the crisis shelters and characteristics of the users between shelters in the capital and the other shelters throughout Norway.
DESIGN: Observational study.
METHOD: The study was based on data from each crisis shelter in 2019 and 2020. Comparison between the 2 years were based on corresponding periods (12 March until 31 December) and analysed with -test and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Total use of crises centres, residential stays and daytime visits were lower during the pandemic (n = 7102) compared to the pre-pandemic period (n = 11 814). There was a shift from daytime visits to phone contacts when the restrictions were established. There was a higher proportion of residential stays versus daytime visits during the pandemic (21.5%) compared to the pre-pandemic period (15.4%) (p ⩽ 0.001). The proportion of first-time users was higher during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic period both for residents (52.4% vs 47.1%) and daytime visitors (10.9% vs 9.0%). Among first-time crisis shelter residents during the pandemic period, fewer reported having children at home compared to the pre-pandemic period. The background of the crisis-shelter users did not differ between the capital and rest of Norway, but the capital had relatively more residents with psychological violence and threats during the pandemic.
CONCLUSION: The utilization of Norwegian crisis shelters, especially daytime visits was lower during the pandemic. There was a shift in daytime contacts from visits to phone contact at the pandemic outbreak. To ensure that information about available crisis shelters reaches the total population, these shelters should be prepared for a higher volume of phone contacts in a future pandemic situation.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):2292 [PMID: 34915874]
  2. Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Dec 10;2:589702 [PMID: 33345164]
  3. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0259275 [PMID: 34710174]
  4. Scand J Public Health. 2008 Mar;36(2):161-8 [PMID: 18519280]
  5. Violence Against Women. 2020 Sep;26(11):1267-1285 [PMID: 31378158]
  6. J Crim Justice. 2021 May-Jun;74:101806 [PMID: 36281275]
  7. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221095536 [PMID: 35441537]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:27-30 [PMID: 27058634]
  9. Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Feb;319:110650 [PMID: 33340849]
  10. Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813 [PMID: 35182472]
  11. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 2):104800 [PMID: 33218711]
  12. Lancet. 2002 Oct 5;360(9339):1083-8 [PMID: 12384003]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;22(1):1175 [PMID: 35698104]
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):896 [PMID: 35820916]
  15. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100376 [PMID: 34514371]
  16. Viruses. 2020 Mar 27;12(4): [PMID: 32230900]
  17. Clin Soc Work J. 2022;50(2):135-146 [PMID: 35103027]
  18. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):719-745 [PMID: 34402325]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):294 [PMID: 35151293]
  20. J Fam Violence. 2022;37(6):927-937 [PMID: 33846666]
  21. Am J Crim Justice. 2020;45(4):601-635 [PMID: 32837161]
  22. Violence Against Women. 2006 Nov;12(11):1003-18 [PMID: 17043363]

MeSH Term

Child
Humans
COVID-19
Communicable Disease Control
Pandemics
Norway

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pandemiccrisissheltersperioddaytimecomparedvisitsCOVID-19violencepre-pandemicstudyNorwegianfirst-timeuserscapitalshelterphonecontactshigherresidentsdomestic2020visitorsutilizationNorwaybasedresidentialstayslowershiftproportion4%vsBACKGROUND:measuresintroducedcontrolincludinglockdownsphysicaldistancingexertedconsiderableinfluencesocietyOBJECTIVES:aimsexamine1prevalencepeopleseekingfirstyear2demographytypeamong3comparecharacteristicsthroughoutDESIGN:ObservationalMETHOD:data2019Comparison2 yearscorrespondingperiods12March31Decemberanalysed-testchi-squaretestsRESULTS:Totalusecrisescentresn = 7102n = 11814restrictionsestablishedversus215%15p ⩽ 000152471%109%90%Amongfewerreportedchildrenhomebackgroundcrisis-shelterdifferrestrelativelypsychologicalthreatsCONCLUSION:especiallycontactoutbreakensureinformationavailablereachestotalpopulationpreparedvolumefuturesituationUtilizationpandemics

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.