Healthcare costs of different treatment options for condylar fractures.

Loreine M L Helmer, Leander Dubois, Frank Lobbezoo, Jan de Lange, Judith E Bosmans
Author Information
  1. Loreine M L Helmer: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam (AUMC) and Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ Amsterdam ZO, Amsterdam, 1105, the Netherlands.
  2. Leander Dubois: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam (AUMC), Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ Amsterdam ZO, 1105, the Netherlands.
  3. Frank Lobbezoo: Departments of Oral Health Sciences and of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081, LA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  4. Jan de Lange: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam (AUMC), Academic Centre for Dentistry (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ Amsterdam ZO, Amsterdam, 1105, the Netherlands.
  5. Judith E Bosmans: Section Health Technology Assessment, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Objective: As treatment options for condylar fractures have comparable outcomes, getting insight into associated costs is a first step towards implementing value-based healthcare (VBH). Therefore, we described the actual costs of the different treatment options (surgical, conservative, and expectative treatment) for condylar fractures. We expected surgical treatment to be the most expensive treatment.
Study design: This is a cost-of-illness study, based on estimates from the literature. Firstly, care pathways of all treatment options were described. Secondly, the costs per step were calculated based on the literature and Dutch guidelines for economic evaluations in health care.
Results: The direct treatment costs of surgical treatment (€3721 to €4040) are three to five times higher than conservative treatment (€730 to €1332). When lost productivity costs during the recovery period are included, costs of surgical treatment remain 1.5 times higher (€9511 to €9830 for surgical treatment and €6224 to €6826 for conservative treatment). The costs of expectative treatment (€5436) are lower than both other treatments.
Conclusion: The costs for surgical treatment are considerably higher than those for conservative or expectative treatment, mainly related to direct treatment cost. Future research should focus on the patients' perspective, to support implementation of VBH in treating condylar fractures.

References

  1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;46(10):1257-1266 [PMID: 28732561]
  2. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Apr;60(4):450-6 [PMID: 26742816]
  3. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 May;47(5):683-684 [PMID: 29452726]
  4. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;56(5):371-379 [PMID: 29650475]
  5. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 18;153(4):e176233 [PMID: 29490366]
  6. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 01;11(3):299-307 [PMID: 32729284]
  7. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;78(11):2018-2026 [PMID: 32777245]
  8. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Dec;7(Suppl 1):S044-58 [PMID: 25489390]
  9. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;43(7):1004-9 [PMID: 26116309]
  10. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;46(8):1232-1240 [PMID: 29866435]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81 [PMID: 21142528]
  12. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1821-6 [PMID: 25052733]
  13. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e438-52 [PMID: 22503083]
  14. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Apr;119(4):402-7 [PMID: 25687196]
  15. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;34(7):421-32 [PMID: 17055280]
  16. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb;15(1):12-8 [PMID: 3083000]
  17. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun 1;145(6):536-541 [PMID: 30946454]
  18. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):140-5 [PMID: 25940585]
  19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Oct;50(4):326-32 [PMID: 23119453]
  20. Dent Traumatol. 2017 Jun;33(3):175-180 [PMID: 28177582]
  21. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;73(3):482-93 [PMID: 25577459]
  22. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):456-464 [PMID: 27955799]
  23. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Aug;34(4):211-5 [PMID: 26026985]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentcostssurgicaloptionscondylarfracturesconservativeexpectativehigherstepVBHdescribeddifferentbasedliteraturecaredirecttimesObjective:comparableoutcomesgettinginsightassociatedfirsttowardsimplementingvalue-basedhealthcareThereforeactualexpectedexpensiveStudydesign:cost-of-illnessstudyestimatesFirstlypathwaysSecondlypercalculatedDutchguidelineseconomicevaluationshealthResults:€3721€4040threefive€730€1332lostproductivityrecoveryperiodincludedremain15€9511€9830€6224€6826€5436lowertreatmentsConclusion:considerablymainlyrelatedcostFutureresearchfocuspatients'perspectivesupportimplementationtreatingHealthcare

Similar Articles

Cited By