Assessment of the electromagnetic field exposure due to wireless communication technologies in two university campuses of medellin, Colombia.

Fabio L Suarez, Sara M Yepes, Adolfo Escobar
Author Information
  1. Fabio L Suarez: Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM, Medellin, Colombia.
  2. Sara M Yepes: Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM, Medellin, Colombia.
  3. Adolfo Escobar: Advanced Materials and Energy Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM, Medellin, Colombia.

Abstract

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) is considered an area of significant importance in the medical and scientific community. However, the availability of exposure data for indoor and outdoor locations in universities is limited and currently inconsiderate in Latin America. The aim of this work was to evaluate the electric field levels due to mobile telecommunication technologies and Wi-Fi to which students and faculty staff from two campuses of a higher education institution are exposed. Using a portable spectrum analyzer, we carried out 516 short-term measurements in the 800-3000 MHz frequency range at both indoor and outdoor locations. These locations were chosen to cover all areas of the assessed buildings. The electric field differences between floors and buildings are discussed. Finally, we compared the electric field levels with exposure limits. The highest electric field level measured was 13.97 V/m at the 850 MHz band. However, the average electric field values were below 2 V/m. The greatest contribution to the total electric field was due to sources using the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz bands (98%), while the contribution of the Wi-Fi network was low (1.0%). The results show that all the electric field levels measured were lower than the ICNIRP reference levels for radio-frequency exposure.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108517 [PMID: 31202043]
  2. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;28(2):147-160 [PMID: 28766560]
  3. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020 Dec 30;192(1):1-13 [PMID: 33230555]
  4. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(5):497-504 [PMID: 27759027]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4): [PMID: 33673014]
  6. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):14735-14750 [PMID: 32052328]
  7. Environ Int. 2018 Sep;118:60-69 [PMID: 29803802]
  8. Environ Res. 2023 Feb 1;218:114979 [PMID: 36460078]
  9. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Dec;31(4):404-15 [PMID: 22676177]
  10. Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524 [PMID: 32167495]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 17;16(6): [PMID: 30884917]
  12. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):37-44 [PMID: 23942394]
  13. Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt B):113252 [PMID: 35421393]
  14. Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Apr;187(4):191 [PMID: 25787169]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 3):160008 [PMID: 36368387]
  16. Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:405-416 [PMID: 29573716]
  17. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):34005-34017 [PMID: 32557061]
  18. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Nov;117(11):A484-5; author reply A485 [PMID: 20049098]
  19. Geospat Health. 2018 May 07;13(1):527 [PMID: 29772874]
  20. Bioelectromagnetics. 2017 Jul;38(5):397-400 [PMID: 28444698]
  21. Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 2;192(2):77 [PMID: 31897614]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6): [PMID: 32183369]
  23. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 15;877:162852 [PMID: 36931516]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fieldelectricexposurelevelslocationsdueelectromagneticHoweverindooroutdoortechnologiesWi-Fitwocampuseseducationinstitutionbuildingsmeasured850 MHzcontributionICNIRPcommunicationExposureradiofrequencyfieldsRF-EMFsconsideredareasignificantimportancemedicalscientificcommunityavailabilitydatauniversitieslimitedcurrentlyinconsiderateLatinAmericaaimworkevaluatemobiletelecommunicationstudentsfacultystaffhigherexposedUsingportablespectrumanalyzercarried516short-termmeasurements800-3000 MHzfrequencyrangechosencoverareasassesseddifferencesfloorsdiscussedFinallycomparedlimitshighestlevel1397 V/mbandaveragevalues2 V/mgreatesttotalsourcesusing1900 MHzbands98%networklow10%resultsshowlowerreferenceradio-frequencyAssessmentwirelessuniversitymedellinColombiaBand-selectivemeasurementElectromagneticHigherMobileRadiofrequency

Similar Articles

Cited By