The dynamic network of industries in US stock market: Evidence of GFC, COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war.

Sun-Yong Choi
Author Information
  1. Sun-Yong Choi: Department of Financial Mathematics, Gachon University, Gyeoggi 13120, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

We investigate the topology of sectoral returns in the US stock market using minimum spanning tree (MST) analysis. We examine four distinct time periods: the full period, the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war period. By comparing the static results across these periods, we identify differences in the network structure. Additionally, a rolling window analysis is conducted to explore the time-varying nature of the MST. We employ a TVP-VAR based connectedness framework to ensure a robust analysis of the sectoral return linkages. Our main findings are summarized as follows: First, the structure of the MST varies in different periods, with distinct crisis period structures. During the GFC, the industrial sector dominated clustering, whereas COVID-19 affected the financial, IT, and industrial sectors. The Russia-Ukraine war period showed clustering centered on materials, except in the industrial sector. These varying structures may explain the different characteristics of each crisis. Second, both static and rolling window analyses highlight the significance of the industrial sector in the US stock market. Third, the utilities sector exhibits the lowest centrality measures, indicating its minimal importance and lack of relationships with other industries. These findings provide valuable insights into the interrelationships among industries in the US stock market. Market participants can leverage these findings to enhance their understanding and improve their portfolio management. By utilizing this information, investors can develop optimal diversification strategies to maximize returns and minimize risk.

Keywords

References

  1. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102515 [PMID: 36406741]
  2. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102569 [PMID: 36466969]
  3. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023 Feb;187:122174 [PMID: 36407788]
  4. Ann Oper Res. 2023 Mar 22;:1-27 [PMID: 37361093]
  5. PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232508 [PMID: 32369536]
  6. Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Apr;56:101377 [PMID: 36540770]
  7. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0261835 [PMID: 35030202]
  8. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jul;88(1):012806 [PMID: 23944517]
  9. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Nov;68(5 Pt 2):056110 [PMID: 14682849]
  10. Scott J Polit Econ. 2021 Jul;68(3):287-297 [PMID: 33821043]
  11. Financ Res Lett. 2022 May;46:102340 [PMID: 35431682]
  12. J Policy Model. 2021 Jan-Feb;43(1):15-33 [PMID: 32904465]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0USstockperiodCOVID-19Russia-UkrainewarindustrialsectormarketMSTanalysisGFCpandemicnetworkfindingscrisisindustriessectoralreturnsspanningtreedistinctstaticperiodsstructurerollingwindowreturndifferentstructuresclusteringfinancialcaninvestigatetopologyusingminimumexaminefourtimeperiods:fullGlobalFinancialCrisiscomparingresultsacrossidentifydifferencesAdditionallyconductedexploretime-varyingnatureemployTVP-VARbasedconnectednessframeworkensurerobustlinkagesmainsummarizedfollows:FirstvariesdominatedwhereasaffectedITsectorsshowedcenteredmaterialsexceptvaryingmayexplaincharacteristicsSecondanalyseshighlightsignificanceThirdutilitiesexhibitslowestcentralitymeasuresindicatingminimalimportancelackrelationshipsprovidevaluableinsightsinterrelationshipsamongMarketparticipantsleverageenhanceunderstandingimproveportfoliomanagementutilizinginformationinvestorsdevelopoptimaldiversificationstrategiesmaximizeminimizeriskdynamicmarket:Evidence2008globalDynamicMinimumSectoral

Similar Articles

Cited By