Treatment and Response Factors in Muscle Activation during Spinal Manipulation.

Stuart J Currie, Casey A Myers, Brian A Enebo, Bradley S Davidson
Author Information
  1. Stuart J Currie: Independent Researcher, Sheridan, CO 80110, USA. ORCID
  2. Casey A Myers: Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, 2155 East Wesley Ave, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
  3. Brian A Enebo: Independent Researcher, Golden, CO 80403, USA.
  4. Bradley S Davidson: Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, 2155 East Wesley Ave, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

Abstract

The forces applied during a spinal manipulation produce a neuromuscular response in the paraspinal muscles. A systematic evaluation of the factors involved in producing this muscle activity provides a clinical insight. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of (manipulation sequence and manipulation site) and (muscle layer, muscle location, and muscle side) on the neuromuscular response to spinal manipulation. The surface and indwelling electromyographies of 8 muscle sites were recorded during lumbar side-lying manipulations in 20 asymptomatic participants. The effects of the factors on the number of muscle responses and the muscle activity onset delays were compared using mixed-model linear regressions, effect sizes, and equivalence testing. The did not reveal statistical differences between the manipulation sequences (first or second) or manipulation sites (L3 or SI) in the number of muscle responses ( = 0.11, = 0.28, respectively), or in muscle activity onset delays ( = 0.35 = 0.35, respectively). There were significantly shorter muscle activity onset delays in the multifidi compared to the superficial muscles ( = 0.02). A small effect size of side ( = 0.44) was observed with significantly greater number of responses ( = 0.02) and shorter muscle activity onset delays ( < 0.001) in the muscles on the left side compared to the right. The location, layer, and side of the neuromuscular responses revealed trends of decreasing muscle response rates and increasing muscle activity onset delays as the distance from the manipulation site increased. These results build on the body of work suggesting that the specificity of manipulation site may not play a role in the neuromuscular response to spinal manipulation-at least within the lumbar spine. In addition, these results demonstrate that multiple manipulations performed in similar areas (L3 and S1) do not change the response significantly, as well as contribute to the clinical understanding that the muscle response rate is higher and with a shorter delay, the closer it is to the manipulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur Spine J. 2002 Feb;11(1):13-9 [PMID: 11931058]
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 1;29(13):1452-7 [PMID: 15223938]
  3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2724-7 [PMID: 17077742]
  4. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2443-54 [PMID: 14612481]
  5. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Jan;18(1):9-13 [PMID: 12527241]
  6. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):797-804 [PMID: 25841562]
  7. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6 [PMID: 20538226]
  8. Joint Bone Spine. 2003 Sep;70(5):336-41 [PMID: 14563460]
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jan 15;24(2):146-52; discussion 153 [PMID: 9926385]
  10. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Nov-Dec;23(9):585-95 [PMID: 11145798]
  11. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82 [PMID: 23997866]
  12. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1986 Nov;1(4):205-13 [PMID: 23915551]
  13. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):508-13 [PMID: 19027344]
  14. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):724-31 [PMID: 22516351]
  15. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 May;18(4):233-6 [PMID: 7636413]
  16. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Oct;35(8):614-21 [PMID: 22902194]
  17. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 May;16(4):293-9 [PMID: 11358616]
  18. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):2-11 [PMID: 11174689]
  19. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 May;39(4):279-87 [PMID: 27072513]
  20. Phys Ther. 2000 May;80(5):485-98 [PMID: 10792859]
  21. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 25;2:765921 [PMID: 35295422]
  22. Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):796-801 [PMID: 29480409]
  23. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Aug 10;20(1):26 [PMID: 22883534]
  24. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2008;10(2):65-8 [PMID: 19032000]
  25. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Feb;27(2):e2 [PMID: 14970817]
  26. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Jan;45(1):33-44 [PMID: 35753874]
  27. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Sep;35(9):1532-8 [PMID: 17473984]
  28. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Apr;12(3):165-171 [PMID: 11415689]
  29. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Sep;22(7):444-6 [PMID: 10519560]
  30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(9):669-77 [PMID: 23206961]
  31. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):579-91 [PMID: 14673407]
  32. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(1):E19-24 [PMID: 20046558]
  33. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 21;21(1):36 [PMID: 24499598]
  34. Muscle Nerve. 1991 Jun;14(6):521-6 [PMID: 1852159]
  35. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  36. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;37(10):613-9 [PMID: 17970408]
  37. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):655-62 [PMID: 22429823]
  38. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 May;28(4):e1-7 [PMID: 15883571]
  39. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Sep;28(7):465-71 [PMID: 16182019]
  40. Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):277-90 [PMID: 15863084]
  41. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):692-6 [PMID: 22425147]

Grants

  1. R00 AT004983/NCCIH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0musclemanipulation0=responseactivityonsetdelaysspinalneuromuscularmusclessideresponseseffectsitenumbercomparedsignificantlyshorterparaspinalfactorsclinicallayerlocationsiteslumbarmanipulationsL3respectively3502resultsforcesappliedproducesystematicevaluationinvolvedproducingprovidesinsightpurposestudyquantifysequencesurfaceindwellingelectromyographies8recordedside-lying20asymptomaticparticipantseffectsusingmixed-modellinearregressionssizesequivalencetestingrevealstatisticaldifferencessequencesfirstsecondSI1128multifidisuperficialsmallsize44observedgreater<001leftrightrevealedtrendsdecreasingratesincreasingdistanceincreasedbuildbodyworksuggestingspecificitymayplayrolemanipulation-atleastwithinspineadditiondemonstratemultipleperformedsimilarareasS1changewellcontributeunderstandingratehigherdelaycloserTreatmentResponseFactorsMuscleActivationSpinalManipulationelectromyographyreflex

Similar Articles

Cited By