A New Approach to Predict Tributary Phosphorus Loads Using Machine Learning- and Physics-Based Modeling Systems.

Christina Feng Chang, Marina Astitha, Yongping Yuan, Chunling Tang, Penny Vlahos, Valerie Garcia, Ummul Khaira
Author Information
  1. Christina Feng Chang: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  2. Marina Astitha: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut. ORCID
  3. Yongping Yuan: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
  4. Chunling Tang: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
  5. Penny Vlahos: Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut.
  6. Valerie Garcia: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  7. Ummul Khaira: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.

Abstract

Tributary phosphorus (P) loads are one of the main drivers of eutrophication problems in freshwater lakes. Being able to predict P loads can aid in understanding subsequent load patterns and elucidate potential degraded water quality conditions in downstream surface waters. We demonstrate the development and performance of an integrated multimedia modeling system that uses machine learning (ML) to assess and predict monthly total P (TP) and dissolved reactive P (DRP) loads. Meteorological variables from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, hydrologic variables from the Variable Infiltration Capacity model, and agricultural management practice variables from the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate agroecosystem model are utilized to train the ML models to predict P loads. Our study presents a new modeling methodology using as testbeds the Maumee, Sandusky, Portage, and Raisin watersheds, which discharge into Lake Erie and contribute to significant P loads to the lake. Two models were built, one for TP loads using 10 environmental variables and one for DRP loads using nine environmental variables. Both models ranked streamflow as the most important predictive variable. In comparison with observations, TP and DRP loads were predicted very well temporally and spatially. Modeling results of TP loads are within the ranges of those obtained from other studies and on some occasions more accurate. Modeling results of DRP loads exceed performance measures from other studies. We explore the ability of both ML-based models to further improve as more data become available over time. This integrated multimedia approach is recommended for studying other freshwater systems and water quality variables using available decadal data from physics-based model simulations.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7543-7550 [PMID: 31244082]
  2. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e85573 [PMID: 24427318]
  3. Environ Pollut. 1999;100(1-3):197-207 [PMID: 15093118]
  4. J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):114000 [PMID: 34872174]
  5. Harmful Algae. 2016 Jun;56:44-66 [PMID: 28073496]
  6. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2011 Oct;47(5):1011-1033 [PMID: 22457580]
  7. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 2;50(15):8135-45 [PMID: 27336855]
  8. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Oct 15;44(20):7756-8 [PMID: 20804137]
  9. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 1;569-570:1265-1281 [PMID: 27387796]
  10. J Great Lakes Res. 2021 Dec 13;47(6):1656-1670 [PMID: 35967967]
  11. J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2020 Jan 24;11(12):4645-4668 [PMID: 34122728]
  12. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:87-97 [PMID: 28073483]
  13. Water Res. 2022 Jul 15;220:118664 [PMID: 35671686]
  14. Sci Data. 2020 May 28;7(1):161 [PMID: 32467642]
  15. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:7059-7076 [PMID: 31320910]
  16. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 17;49(6):3392-400 [PMID: 25679045]
  17. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2009 Apr;45(2):534-549 [PMID: 22457567]
  18. Environ Health. 2008 Nov 07;7 Suppl 2:S4 [PMID: 19025675]
  19. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2003;10(2):126-39 [PMID: 12729046]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6448-52 [PMID: 23576718]
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42444 [PMID: 22870327]
  22. Water Res. 2001 Jun;35(8):2022-8 [PMID: 11337850]
  23. Environ Sci Technol. 1986 Aug 1;20(8):752-9 [PMID: 22196697]
  24. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:145-159 [PMID: 28073473]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0loadsPvariablesmodelsTPDRPusingonepredictmodelModelingTributaryfreshwaterwaterqualityperformanceintegratedmultimediamodelinglearningMLenvironmentalresultsstudiesdataavailableMachinephosphorusmaindriverseutrophicationproblemslakesablecanaidunderstandingsubsequentloadpatternselucidatepotentialdegradedconditionsdownstreamsurfacewatersdemonstratedevelopmentsystemusesmachineassessmonthlytotaldissolvedreactiveMeteorologicalWeatherResearchForecastingWRFModelhydrologicVariableInfiltrationCapacityagriculturalmanagementpracticeEnvironmentalPolicyIntegratedClimateagroecosystemutilizedtrainstudypresentsnewmethodologytestbedsMaumeeSanduskyPortageRaisinwatershedsdischargeLakeEriecontributesignificantlakeTwobuilt10ninerankedstreamflowimportantpredictivevariablecomparisonobservationspredictedwelltemporallyspatiallywithinrangesobtainedoccasionsaccurateexceedmeasuresexploreabilityML-basedimprovebecometimeapproachrecommendedstudyingsystemsdecadalphysics-basedsimulationsNewApproachPredictPhosphorusLoadsUsingLearning-Physics-BasedSystemsAgricultureFreshwaterHydrologicMesoscaleNumericalweatherprediction/forecasting

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)