Predictors and prognosis of population-based subjective cognitive decline: longitudinal evidence from the Caerphilly Prospective Study (CaPS).

Harriet A Ball, Elizabeth Coulthard, Mark Fish, Antony Bayer, John Gallacher, Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Author Information
  1. Harriet A Ball: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK harriet.ball@bristol.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Elizabeth Coulthard: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
  3. Mark Fish: Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK.
  4. Antony Bayer: Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  5. John Gallacher: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  6. Yoav Ben-Shlomo: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand associations between the subjective experience of cognitive decline and objective cognition. This subjective experience is often conceptualised as an early step towards neurodegeneration, but this has not been scrutinised at the population level. An alternative explanation is poor meta-cognition, the extreme of which is seen in functional cognitive disorder (FCD).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort (Caerphilly Prospective Study).
SETTING: Population-based, South Wales, UK.
PARTICIPANTS: This men-only study began in 1979; 1225 men participated at an average age of 73 in 2002-2004, including assessments of simple subjective cognitive decline (sSCD, defined as a subjective report of worsening memory or concentration). Dementia outcomes were followed up to 2012-2014. Data on non-completers was additionally obtained from death certificates and local health records.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was incident dementia over 10 years. Secondary outcome measures included prospective change in objective cognition and cross-sectional cognitive internal inconsistency (the existence of a cognitive ability at some times, and its absence at other times, with no intervening explanatory factors except for focus of attention).
RESULTS: sSCD was common (30%) and only weakly associated with prior objective cognitive decline (sensitivity 36% (95% CI 30 to 42) and specificity 72% (95% CI 68 to 75)). Independent predictors of sSCD were older age, poor sleep quality and higher trait anxiety. Those with sSCD did not have excess cognitive internal inconsistency, but results suggested a mild attentional deficit. sSCD did not predict objective cognitive change (linear regression coefficient -0.01 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.15)) nor dementia (odds ratio 1.35 (0.61 to 2.99)) 10 years later.
CONCLUSIONS: sSCD is weakly associated with prior objective cognitive decline and does not predict future cognition. Prior sleep difficulties and anxiety were the most robust predictors of sSCD. sSCD in the absence of objective decline appears to be a highly prevalent example of poor meta-cognition (ie, poor self-awareness of cognitive performance), which could be a driver for later FCD.

Keywords

References

  1. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(4):1387-1398 [PMID: 29376850]
  2. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;28(4):931-9 [PMID: 22133761]
  3. Psychol Aging. 2014 Jun;29(2):250-63 [PMID: 24955993]
  4. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Sep 28;9(4): [PMID: 31569352]
  5. Age Ageing. 2002 Jan;31(1):43-8 [PMID: 11850307]
  6. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 May;21(5):432-41 [PMID: 16676287]
  7. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;89(12):1308-1319 [PMID: 29735513]
  8. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 May 16;8:96-107 [PMID: 28560310]
  9. Curr Psychol. 2020 Jun;39(3):870-877 [PMID: 32523323]
  10. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2019 Sep;24(5):311-321 [PMID: 31389291]
  11. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72(2):507-514 [PMID: 31594225]
  12. Aging Ment Health. 2009 Sep;13(5):699-705 [PMID: 19882408]
  13. Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Dec;149:698-709 [PMID: 3790869]
  14. Psychol Med. 1989 Nov;19(4):1015-22 [PMID: 2594878]
  15. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):619-27 [PMID: 19523877]
  16. Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844-52 [PMID: 24798886]
  17. J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:143-151 [PMID: 30639919]
  18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):232-238 [PMID: 30444944]
  19. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 May;35(5):507-515 [PMID: 31943347]
  20. Eur J Neurol. 2019 Sep;26(9):1153-1160 [PMID: 30924985]
  21. Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):25-33 [PMID: 18259098]
  22. Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Mar;15(3):465-476 [PMID: 30555032]
  23. Ergonomics. 2015;58(9):1471-86 [PMID: 25855858]
  24. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 [PMID: 17947786]
  25. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Jan 5;11(1):1 [PMID: 30611304]
  26. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Mar 10;9:46 [PMID: 28344552]
  27. Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):104-114 [PMID: 28625188]
  28. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;7(2):191-207 [PMID: 31732482]
  29. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;92(11):1215-1221 [PMID: 34035132]
  30. Stat Med. 2004 Jul 30;23(14):2215-26 [PMID: 15236426]
  31. Brain. 2020 Oct 1;143(10):2895-2903 [PMID: 32791521]
  32. Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Dec;26(4):376-393 [PMID: 27714573]
  33. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Apr;26(4):573-80 [PMID: 24411288]
  34. Psychogeriatrics. 2009 Jun;9(2):85-90 [PMID: 19604331]
  35. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6):e100991 [PMID: 24968354]
  36. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Apr;11(2):333-345 [PMID: 27848149]
  37. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Mar;19(3):271-278 [PMID: 31958406]

Grants

  1. MR/T033371/1/Medical Research Council

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Aged
Prospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cognitive Dysfunction
Cognition
Prognosis
Dementia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitivesSCDobjectivesubjectivedeclinepoorcognitionProspectivedementia95%CIexperiencemeta-cognitionFCDCaerphillyStudyageoutcome10yearschangeinternalinconsistencytimesabsenceweaklyassociatedpriorpredictorssleepanxietypredict-00laterOBJECTIVES:understandassociationsoftenconceptualisedearlysteptowardsneurodegenerationscrutinisedpopulationlevelalternativeexplanationextremeseenfunctionaldisorderDESIGN:cohortSETTING:Population-basedSouthWalesUKPARTICIPANTS:men-onlystudybegan19791225menparticipatedaverage732002-2004includingassessmentssimpledefinedreportworseningmemoryconcentrationDementiaoutcomesfollowed2012-2014Datanon-completersadditionallyobtaineddeathcertificateslocalhealthrecordsPRIMARYANDSECONDARYOUTCOMEMEASURES:primarymeasureincidentSecondarymeasuresincludedprospectivecross-sectionalexistenceabilityinterveningexplanatoryfactorsexceptfocusattentionRESULTS:common30%sensitivity36%3042specificity72%6875Independentolderqualityhighertraitexcessresultssuggestedmildattentionaldeficitlinearregressioncoefficient011315oddsratio13561299CONCLUSIONS:futurePriordifficultiesrobustappearshighlyprevalentexampleieself-awarenessperformancedriverPredictorsprognosispopulation-baseddecline:longitudinalevidenceCaPSdelirium&disordersepidemiology

Similar Articles

Cited By