Motivational stimuli to donate sperm among non-donor students.

Maya Ronen, Alon Kedem, Sarit Avraham, Michal Youngster, Gil Yerushalmi, Ariel Hourvitz, Itai Gat
Author Information
  1. Maya Ronen: Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. mayaronenmd@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Alon Kedem: Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  3. Sarit Avraham: IVF Department, Shamir Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel.
  4. Michal Youngster: IVF Department, Shamir Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel.
  5. Gil Yerushalmi: IVF Department, Shamir Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel.
  6. Ariel Hourvitz: Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  7. Itai Gat: Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sperm banks face a continuously evolving gap between the increasing demand for sperm donation (SD) vs. limited available reserve. To improve donors' recruitment and increase supply, motivations towards SD should be investigated specifically among young men who have the potential to become donors. Our aim was to evaluate factors which increase and decrease predisposition to donate sperm among non-donor students, who represent a "potential pool" for possible donors' recruitment.
RESULTS: Ninety-three men fulfilled the questionnaire with mean age of 28.2 ± 4.5 years. The most powerful incentive to donate sperm was financial reward followed by a willingness to help others to build a family (3.8 and 3.4, respectively). The most dominant consideration to decline donation was the fear of anonymity loss and future regret (4 and 3.8). While participants' willingness for anonymous SD was fair (2.8), the open-identity donation was rated significantly lower (1.75, p < 0.01). Familiarity with recipients and offspring had lower scores (1.9-2.2) as well.
CONCLUSIONS: Young single men represent a suitable cohort for anonymous donation. Financial reward and willingness to help others are important positive incentives while anonymity preservation is crucial to maintain their willingness towards SD. Regulatory shifting towards open-identity SD necessitates the establishment of an alternative "potential pool" population as a reliable source to recruit donors.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Underst Sci. 2009 Jan;18(1):61-77 [PMID: 19579535]
  2. Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):1160-6 [PMID: 25123638]
  3. Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2208-2218 [PMID: 31711146]
  4. Hum Reprod. 1994 May;9(5):882-8 [PMID: 7929737]
  5. BMJ. 2007 May 12;334(7601):971 [PMID: 17493999]
  6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):2007-2016 [PMID: 31463872]
  7. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Apr 07;4:13-17 [PMID: 29796427]
  8. Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):718-723 [PMID: 31371048]
  9. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):252-257.e1 [PMID: 24140034]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2082-9 [PMID: 27412344]
  11. J Law Biosci. 2015 Oct 29;3(1):39-67 [PMID: 27774232]
  12. Fertil Steril. 2019 Jun;111(6):1102-1104 [PMID: 31155117]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1089-96 [PMID: 20172868]
  14. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1135-40 [PMID: 27073260]
  15. Reprod Sci. 2023 May;30(5):1651-1659 [PMID: 36401071]
  16. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Feb 06;2020(1):hoz044 [PMID: 32042927]
  17. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019 Feb;37(1):3-12 [PMID: 30375886]
  18. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Oct 6;15(1):53-67 [PMID: 36618956]
  19. Econ Hum Biol. 2016 Dec;23:1-9 [PMID: 27359087]
  20. Sex Res Social Policy. 2022;19(1):147-158 [PMID: 33527001]
  21. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Nov 12;11:73-81 [PMID: 33319080]
  22. Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):483-493 [PMID: 27887716]
  23. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):297-299 [PMID: 30021089]
  24. Hum Reprod. 1998 Mar;13(3):771-5 [PMID: 9572451]
  25. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jan;28(1):96-9 [PMID: 18259910]
  26. Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):539-547 [PMID: 28865553]
  27. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan;35(1):107-118 [PMID: 28895013]
  28. Ups J Med Sci. 2008;113(3):305-13 [PMID: 18991243]
  29. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):202-208 [PMID: 27012652]
  30. Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 01;37(3):510-521 [PMID: 34918081]
  31. J Law Biosci. 2016 Nov 23;3(3):468-488 [PMID: 28852536]
  32. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):37-51 [PMID: 23146866]
  33. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Mar;16(1):44-7 [PMID: 23548093]
  34. Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):230-231 [PMID: 29331239]
  35. Hum Reprod. 2018 Jun 1;33(6):1099-1106 [PMID: 29701833]
  36. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012 Jan;69(1):49-57 [PMID: 22397297]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0donationSDspermwillingnessSpermtowardsamongmendonate38donors'recruitmentincreasedonorsnon-donorstudentsrepresent"potentialpool"rewardhelpothers4anonymityanonymous2open-identitylower1BACKGROUND:banksfacecontinuouslyevolvinggapincreasingdemandvslimitedavailablereserveimprovesupplymotivationsinvestigatedspecificallyyoungpotentialbecomeaimevaluatefactorsdecreasepredispositionpossibleRESULTS:Ninety-threefulfilledquestionnairemeanage282 ± 45yearspowerfulincentivefinancialfollowedbuildfamilyrespectivelydominantconsiderationdeclinefearlossfutureregretparticipants'fairratedsignificantly75p < 001Familiarityrecipientsoffspringscores9-2wellCONCLUSIONS:YoungsinglesuitablecohortFinancialimportantpositiveincentivespreservationcrucialmaintainRegulatoryshiftingnecessitatesestablishmentalternativepopulationreliablesourcerecruitMotivationalstimuliAnonymityIdentitydisclosurebank

Similar Articles

Cited By