Global knowledge and attitudes towards mpox (monkeypox) among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdolreza Sotoodeh Jahromi, Mohammad Jokar, Nader Sharifi, Sirus Kashkooli, Karamatollah Rahmanian, Vahid Rahmanian
Author Information
  1. Abdolreza Sotoodeh Jahromi: Zoonoses Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. ORCID
  2. Mohammad Jokar: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. ORCID
  3. Nader Sharifi: Department of Public Health, Khomein University of Medical Sciences, Khomein, Iran. ORCID
  4. Sirus Kashkooli: Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
  5. Karamatollah Rahmanian: Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. ORCID
  6. Vahid Rahmanian: Department of Public Health, Torbat Jam Faculty of Medical Sciences, Torbat Jam, Iran. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent increase in human mpox (monkeypox) cases emphasizes the importance of early detection, prompt response and preventive management to control the spread of the disease. Healthcare workers (HCWs) play a crucial role in this process. This study aimed to determine the global knowledge and attitudes towards mpox among HCWs.
METHODS: This study searched multiple databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, Embase, Springer and ProQuest, to locate various publications. The search was limited to English-language articles published between May 2022 (when the increase in mpox incidence was reported) and August 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality checklist was utilized to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data were obtained using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and subsequently scrutinized through STATA software, version 14. The heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using the inverse variance and Cochran Q statistics based on the I2 test statistics. The Dersimonian and Liard random effects models were used where heterogeneity existed. Subgroup analysis and univariate and multivariable metaregression techniques were used to examine the causes of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: A total of 22 studies, including 22 studies for knowledge (27 731 HCWs) and 6 studies for attitudes (14 388 HCWs), were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for good knowledge and positive attitudes among HCWs were 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.8 to 34.2) and 34.6% (95% CI 19.0 to 50.2), respectively. Moreover, the knowledge was 34.8% (95% CI 24.1 to 45.6) among HCWs with <5 y of work experience and 41.6% (95% CI 33.1 to 50) among individuals possessing >5 y of professional background.
CONCLUSIONS: Good knowledge of HCWs is at a low level. It is suggested that training sessions should be tailored towards younger HCWs with less healthcare experience. Additionally, it is essential to identify strategies on how to improve the knowledge and attitudes for better practice about the disease in HCWs worldwide.

Keywords

References

  1. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Oct 17;17:e286 [PMID: 36245310]
  2. Diseases. 2023 Jun 02;11(2): [PMID: 37366869]
  3. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Feb 11;16(2):e0010141 [PMID: 35148313]
  4. Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111 [PMID: 26061376]
  5. Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 04;6:241 [PMID: 30234087]
  6. New Microbes New Infect. 2023 Sep;54:101146 [PMID: 37363720]
  7. Vaccine. 2020 Oct 7;38(43):6800-6806 [PMID: 32861468]
  8. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278622 [PMID: 36454991]
  9. Cureus. 2022 Aug 16;14(8):e28060 [PMID: 36127980]
  10. Pathog Glob Health. 2020 Mar;114(2):68-75 [PMID: 32202967]
  11. Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 17;16(1):20 [PMID: 36932335]
  12. Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:1091267 [PMID: 36923038]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 14;107(37):16262-7 [PMID: 20805472]
  14. J Infect Public Health. 2022 Oct;15(10):1065-1071 [PMID: 36087548]
  15. IJID Reg. 2023 Apr 20;7:271-276 [PMID: 37200559]
  16. Arch Virol. 2023 Jan 5;168(1):31 [PMID: 36604361]
  17. Front Public Health. 2023 May 24;11:1161234 [PMID: 37293610]
  18. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 08;10(9): [PMID: 36141334]
  19. Int Health. 2013 Dec;5(4):237-43 [PMID: 24246742]
  20. J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 4;223(11):1870-1878 [PMID: 33728469]
  21. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;11(2): [PMID: 36851107]
  22. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2022;73(3):365-371 [PMID: 36169392]
  23. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 23;8(2): [PMID: 36828497]
  24. J Infect Public Health. 2023 Mar;16(3):346-353 [PMID: 36682100]
  25. J Infect Public Health. 2023 Jan;16(1):90-95 [PMID: 36508945]
  26. Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1068-1077 [PMID: 28622007]
  27. Rev Med Virol. 2023 Jul;33(4):e2444 [PMID: 36999223]
  28. Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;11:1192542 [PMID: 37575128]
  29. Vacunas. 2023 Apr-Jun;24(2):122-127 [PMID: 36852211]
  30. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):278 [PMID: 37087418]
  31. Virusdisease. 2023 May 26;:1-13 [PMID: 37363364]
  32. J Equine Vet Sci. 2023 Apr;123:104227 [PMID: 36649828]
  33. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;11(1): [PMID: 36680012]
  34. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;6(1):e1081 [PMID: 36698716]
  35. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;11(1): [PMID: 36679942]
  36. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 08;10(12): [PMID: 36560508]
  37. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;11(1): [PMID: 36679864]
  38. Cureus. 2023 Feb 18;15(2):e35157 [PMID: 36950001]
  39. Pathogens. 2022 Aug 11;11(8): [PMID: 36015025]
  40. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):e349-e358 [PMID: 36116460]
  41. J Infect Public Health. 2022 Dec;15(12):1459-1465 [PMID: 36403402]

MeSH Term

Humans
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
Mpox, Monkeypox
Attitude of Health Personnel
Global Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HCWsknowledgeattitudesmpoxamongstudies95%monkeypoxtowardsheterogeneity34CIhealthcareincreasehumandiseaseworkersstudyincludingSciencequalityincludedusingstatisticsused226meta-analysis26%501experienceBACKGROUND:recentcasesemphasizesimportanceearlydetectionpromptresponsepreventivemanagementcontrolspreadHealthcareplaycrucialroleprocessaimeddetermineglobalMETHODS:searchedmultipledatabasesGoogleScholarScopusPubMed/MEDLINEDirectWebEmbaseSpringerProQuestlocatevariouspublicationssearchlimitedEnglish-languagearticlespublishedMay2022incidencereportedAugust2023JoannaBriggsInstituteJBIchecklistutilizedevaluateDataobtainedMicrosoftExcelspreadsheetsubsequentlyscrutinizedSTATAsoftwareversion14assessedinversevarianceCochranQbasedI2testDersimonianLiardrandomeffectsmodelsexistedSubgroupanalysisunivariatemultivariablemetaregressiontechniquesexaminecausesRESULTS:total27 73114 388pooledestimatesgoodpositive260%confidenceinterval[CI]178190respectivelyMoreover8%2445<5 ywork4133individualspossessing>5 yprofessionalbackgroundCONCLUSIONS:GoodlowlevelsuggestedtrainingsessionstailoredyoungerlessAdditionallyessentialidentifystrategiesimprovebetterpracticeworldwideGlobalworkers:systematicreviewawareness

Similar Articles

Cited By