Parental Phubbing and Child Social-Emotional Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Conducted in China.

Jinghui Zhang, Chuanmei Dong, Yue Jiang, Qing Zhang, Hui Li, Yan Li
Author Information
  1. Jinghui Zhang: Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  2. Chuanmei Dong: Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  3. Yue Jiang: Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  4. Qing Zhang: Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  5. Hui Li: Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  6. Yan Li: Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Introduction: Parental phubbing refers to the act of parents using mobile phones in the presence of their children instead of engaging with them. With increasing smartphone use in many households, parental phubbing is a potential threat to children's healthy development. This meta-analysis synthesized the existing evidence on the impact of parental phubbing on children's social-emotional development to examine the effect sizes and identify the moderators.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across multiple electronic databases (Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, Springer, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from 2012 to May 2023. Our search included both English and Chinese literature, encompassing published journal articles as well as thesis. To assess the risk of bias, we utilized the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot interpretation and Egger's regression intercept.
Results: Our comprehensive search identified 42 studies with 56,275 children and 59 effect sizes. A random-effects meta-analysis revealed that parental phubbing was positively associated with children's internalizing problems ( = 0.270; 95% CI [0.234, 0.304]) and externalizing problems ( = 0.210; 95% CI [0.154, 0.264]), while negatively correlated with children's self-concept ( = -0.206; 95% CI [-0.244, -0.168]) and social-emotional competence ( = -0.162; 95% CI [-0.207, -0.120]). Furthermore, the parental phubbing group moderated the association between parental phubbing and internalizing problems, when both parents engage in phubbing, there is a stronger association with children's externalizing problems compared to when only one parent is engaging in phubbing.
Discussion: The findings of this meta-analysis provide strong evidence supporting the detrimental effects of parental phubbing on child social-emotional adjustment. Consequently, parents, researchers, and the government must collaborate to mitigate parental phubbing and promote the healthy development of children's social-emotional abilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Aug;25(8):512-517 [PMID: 35759389]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 12;19(22): [PMID: 36429611]
  3. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):133-63 [PMID: 26151468]
  4. Child Care Health Dev. 2021 Jul;47(4):477-483 [PMID: 33629767]
  5. Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Feb;62:101513 [PMID: 33338985]
  6. Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):100-109 [PMID: 28493400]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72 [PMID: 11843547]
  8. Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2283-90 [PMID: 26180975]
  9. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Jun;23(6):363-370 [PMID: 32271619]
  10. J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Feb;49(2):427-437 [PMID: 31883099]
  11. J Sch Psychol. 2021 Aug;87:64-81 [PMID: 34303448]
  12. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Dec;22(12):779-786 [PMID: 31747305]
  13. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Aug;26(8):579-603 [PMID: 37347957]
  14. Am Psychol. 1998 Sep;53(9):1017-31 [PMID: 9841579]
  15. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP19395-NP19419 [PMID: 34463596]
  16. Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):873-932 [PMID: 28459276]
  17. J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:127-135 [PMID: 32658815]
  18. Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25 [PMID: 29345484]
  19. Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Aug;64:101611 [PMID: 34303915]
  20. J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):991-1008 [PMID: 28453213]
  21. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP9591-NP9612 [PMID: 33371780]
  22. Heliyon. 2021 May 18;7(5):e07037 [PMID: 34041393]
  23. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Aug;37(6):749-75 [PMID: 19263213]
  24. J Behav Addict. 2015 Jun;4(2):60-74 [PMID: 26014669]
  25. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 29;13:868354 [PMID: 35422730]
  26. Pediatr Res. 2018 Aug;84(2):210-218 [PMID: 29895837]
  27. Infant Ment Health J. 2021 Mar;42(2):161-175 [PMID: 33452702]
  28. Child Dev. 2012 Sep-Oct;83(5):1775-88 [PMID: 22716904]
  29. J Adolesc. 2020 Jan;78:43-52 [PMID: 31821961]
  30. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Jun 16;7:23779608211009000 [PMID: 34212075]
  31. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Nov;38(8):1179-91 [PMID: 20623175]
  32. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:194-203 [PMID: 34952115]
  33. Infant Child Dev. 2018 May-Jun;27(3): [PMID: 30140171]
  34. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65 [PMID: 25919529]
  35. Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1228-1239 [PMID: 28703638]
  36. Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4): [PMID: 27940893]
  37. Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):227-244 [PMID: 28722182]
  38. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;5(1):1-14 [PMID: 26304293]
  39. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP5344-NP5366 [PMID: 32976063]
  40. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:69-75 [PMID: 32679315]
  41. J Psychol. 2022;156(5):349-366 [PMID: 35482953]
  42. Addict Behav. 2021 Oct;121:106995 [PMID: 34090204]
  43. Aggress Behav. 2022 Jan;48(1):94-102 [PMID: 34585385]
  44. Child Dev. 2017 Mar;88(2):408-416 [PMID: 28213889]
  45. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0phubbingparentalchildren'sproblemssocial-emotional95%CIparentsdevelopmentmeta-analysissearchinternalizingexternalizingParentalusingchildrenengaginghealthyevidenceeffectsizesChinabiasStudies = 0[00self-concept = -0[-0-0competenceassociationIntroduction:refersactmobilephonespresenceinsteadincreasingsmartphoneusemanyhouseholdspotentialthreatsynthesizedexistingimpactexamineidentifymoderatorsMethods:FollowingPRISMAguidelinesconductedsystematicacrossmultipleelectronicdatabasesWebScienceEBSCOProQuestSpringerNationalKnowledgeInfrastructure2012May2023includedEnglishChineseliteratureencompassingpublishedjournalarticleswellthesisassessriskutilizedQualityAssessmentToolObservationalCohortCross-SectionalPublicationevaluatedfunnelplotinterpretationEgger'sregressioninterceptResults:comprehensiveidentified42studies5627559random-effectsrevealedpositivelyassociated270234304]210154264]negativelycorrelated206244168]162207120]Furthermoregroupmoderatedphubbing andengagestrongercomparedoneparentDiscussion:findingsprovidestrongsupportingdetrimentaleffectschildadjustmentConsequentlyresearchersgovernmentmustcollaboratemitigatepromoteabilitiesPhubbingChildSocial-EmotionalAdjustment:Meta-AnalysisConducted

Similar Articles

Cited By