A latent class analysis of resilience and its association with patient-reported symptoms in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy.

Yanran Li, Zonghao Zhang, Xuanxuan Ma, Xue Zhang, Shuwen Li
Author Information
  1. Yanran Li: Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  2. Zonghao Zhang: Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  3. Xuanxuan Ma: Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  4. Xue Zhang: Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  5. Shuwen Li: Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the latent classes of resilience in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy and develop a deeper understanding of the association between these classes and patient-reported symptoms.
Background: China accounts for more than half of the global burden of esophageal cancer, and patients with esophageal cancer experience numerous symptoms that affect their quality of life and prognosis. Given that resilience is a key element that alleviates the progression of symptoms, it may represent a potential means of to enhancing cancer patients' physical and psychological well-being.
Methods: The study was implemented in the thoracic surgery departments of three tertiary hospitals in eastern China. The participants were patients who were still hospitalized after esophagectomy. Data were gathered by self-report questionnaires, and a latent class analysis was utilized to identify different categories of resilience among the patients.
Results: A total of 226 patients were recruited. The three classes of resilience identified included high strength and striving (53.5%), medium resilience but weak self-recovery (35.9%), and minimal tenacity and external support (10.6%). Patients with low income (OR = 12.540,  = 0.004) were more likely to be in the minimal tenacity and external support class. Patients without comorbidities (OR = 2.413,  = 0.013) and aged 66-70 years (OR = 4.272,  < 0.001) were more likely to be in the high strength and striving class. The patient-reported symptoms and symptom-related interference of patients after esophagectomy varied considerably among the three categories of resilience.
Conclusion: Accurate interventions should be devised and executed according to the features of each type of resilience in patients after esophagectomy to maximize intervention efficacy. These findings highlight the important role of precision nursing.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0252075 [PMID: 34029344]
  2. Ann Behav Med. 2023 Aug 21;57(9):787-799 [PMID: 37078920]
  3. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Feb;75(2):151-160 [PMID: 32913130]
  4. Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4379-4387 [PMID: 35099615]
  5. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:953491 [PMID: 36211943]
  6. Front Public Health. 2023 May 04;11:1090623 [PMID: 37213608]
  7. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Aug;64(2):146-155 [PMID: 35460831]
  8. Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 04;10:842837 [PMID: 35309211]
  9. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(8):4205-4214 [PMID: 36056953]
  10. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2023 May 2;29(5):204-215 [PMID: 37224097]
  11. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):79-85 [PMID: 31743154]
  12. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3471-3486 [PMID: 33512578]
  13. Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82 [PMID: 12964174]
  14. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):5747-5757 [PMID: 35332374]
  15. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3441-3450 [PMID: 31162849]
  16. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;10:749238 [PMID: 35223719]
  17. Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1839-1847 [PMID: 33594825]
  18. J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Oct;17(5):1510-1521 [PMID: 35224684]
  19. Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):695-702 [PMID: 30374776]
  20. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb;109(2):367-374 [PMID: 31550465]
  21. Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Spring-Summer;33(Suppl 4):572-579 [PMID: 34718283]
  22. BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1): [PMID: 33609371]
  23. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  24. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103467 [PMID: 31810018]
  25. Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;44:97-104 [PMID: 35104726]
  26. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:101983 [PMID: 34333385]
  27. Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;17(4):1033-1041 [PMID: 34993840]
  28. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014 Jan 1;21(4):534-552 [PMID: 25328371]
  29. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3088-3096 [PMID: 31225645]
  30. Iran J Public Health. 2021 Apr;50(4):728-736 [PMID: 34183922]
  31. Psychooncology. 2021 Jun;30(6):901-909 [PMID: 33689199]
  32. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Feb;56:102079 [PMID: 34844135]
  33. Cancer Med. 2019 Dec;8(18):7859-7868 [PMID: 31650699]
  34. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;13(4):725-732 [PMID: 30126047]
  35. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590 [PMID: 35143424]
  36. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2021 Sep 15;32(3):243-246 [PMID: 34490440]
  37. Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):271-277 [PMID: 30380589]
  38. Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Nov-Dec;48:85-93 [PMID: 36155314]
  39. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Nov;13(8):1122-1131 [PMID: 36041993]
  40. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Apr;57(4):820-827 [PMID: 30684634]
  41. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;68(7):1428-1434 [PMID: 34176354]
  42. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:710861 [PMID: 34721155]
  43. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 09;13:833176 [PMID: 35356348]
  44. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Mar;30(1):119-128 [PMID: 35488971]
  45. Cancer. 2014 Jan 15;120(2):286-93 [PMID: 24555183]
  46. Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):2053-63 [PMID: 20166216]
  47. Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Feb 28;9(2):147-154 [PMID: 35509702]
  48. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jun;39(3):151432 [PMID: 37149440]
  49. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):168 [PMID: 36564827]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0resiliencepatientscanceresophagealesophagectomysymptomsclasslatentpatient-reportedclassesthreeanalysisidentifyassociationChinacategoriesamonghighstrengthstrivingminimaltenacityexternalsupportPatients = 0likelyPurpose:developdeeperunderstandingBackground:accountshalfglobalburdenexperiencenumerousaffectqualitylifeprognosisGivenkeyelementalleviatesprogressionmayrepresentpotentialmeansenhancingpatients'physicalpsychologicalwell-beingMethods:studyimplementedthoracicsurgerydepartmentstertiaryhospitalseasternparticipantsstillhospitalizedDatagatheredself-reportquestionnairesutilizeddifferentResults:total226recruitedidentifiedincluded535%mediumweakself-recovery359%106%lowincomeOR = 12540004withoutcomorbiditiesOR = 2413013aged66-70 yearsOR = 4272< 0001symptom-relatedinterferencevariedconsiderablyConclusion:Accurateinterventionsdevisedexecutedaccordingfeaturestypemaximizeinterventionefficacyfindingshighlightimportantroleprecisionnursingsymptom

Similar Articles

Cited By