New erythrocyte parameters derived from the Coulter principle relate with red blood cell properties-A pilot study in diabetes mellitus.

Chloé Bourguignon, Clémentine Ansel, Jean-Philippe Gineys, Sophie Schuldiner, Damien Isèbe, Michael Geitner, Pierre Taraconat, Jean-Christophe Gris
Author Information
  1. Chloé Bourguignon: Department of Haematology, Nîmes University Hospital and University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France. ORCID
  2. Clémentine Ansel: Department of Haematology, Nîmes University Hospital and University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
  3. Jean-Philippe Gineys: HORIBA Medical, Parc Euromédecine, Rue du Caducée, Montpellier, France.
  4. Sophie Schuldiner: Department of Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
  5. Damien Isèbe: HORIBA Medical, Parc Euromédecine, Rue du Caducée, Montpellier, France.
  6. Michael Geitner: HORIBA Medical, Parc Euromédecine, Rue du Caducée, Montpellier, France.
  7. Pierre Taraconat: HORIBA Medical, Parc Euromédecine, Rue du Caducée, Montpellier, France.
  8. Jean-Christophe Gris: Department of Haematology, Nîmes University Hospital and University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.

Abstract

In routine hematological instruments, blood cells are counted and sized by monitoring the impedance signals induced during their passage through a Coulter orifice. However, only signals associated with centered paths in the aperture are considered for analysis, while the rejected measurements, caused by near-wall trajectories, can provide additional information on red blood cells (RBC), as recent publications suggest. To assess usefulness of two new parameters in describing alterations in RBC properties, we performed a pilot study to compare blood samples from patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), frequent pathological condition associated with impairment in RBC deformability, versus controls. A total of 345 blood samples were analyzed: 225 in the DM group and 120 in the control group. A diagram of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], the two new parameters derived from the analysis of impedancemetry pulses, was used to compare distribution of RBC subpopulations between groups. To discriminate RBC from DM and control individuals, based on our multiparametric analysis, we built a score from variables derived from [Formula: see text] matrix which showed good performances: area under the receiving operating characteristic curve 0.948 (0.920-0.970), p<0.0001; best discriminating value: negative predictive value 94.7%, positive predictive value was 78.4%. These results seem promising to approach RBC alterations in routine laboratory practice. The related potential clinically relevant outcomes remain to be investigated.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.23677065

References

  1. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):66-75 [PMID: 31149238]
  2. Cytometry A. 2021 Oct;99(10):977-986 [PMID: 33891370]
  3. Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3041-6 [PMID: 19770749]
  4. Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2449-2462 [PMID: 29916386]
  5. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 27;9:451 [PMID: 29755372]
  6. Blood Rev. 2016 Mar;30(2):111-8 [PMID: 26341565]
  7. J Clin Pathol. 2000 May;53(5):335-9 [PMID: 10889813]
  8. J Vis Exp. 2018 Jan 12;(131): [PMID: 29364234]
  9. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Mar 17;2:16012 [PMID: 27159554]
  10. Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 27;13:884690 [PMID: 35574449]
  11. PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280952 [PMID: 36706122]
  12. Blood Rev. 2013 Jul;27(4):167-78 [PMID: 23664421]
  13. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Nov;35(11):e3243 [PMID: 31373760]
  14. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2004;31(4):273-80 [PMID: 15567897]
  15. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 27;352(4):341-50 [PMID: 15673800]
  16. Horm Metab Res. 2011 Oct;43(11):760-5 [PMID: 22009370]
  17. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997 Jan;34 ( Pt 1):17-31 [PMID: 9022885]
  18. Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2239-2251 [PMID: 28190580]
  19. Int Wound J. 2016 Aug;13(4):500-4 [PMID: 26018868]
  20. Microvasc Res. 2001 May;61(3):231-9 [PMID: 11336534]
  21. J Clin Invest. 1980 Apr;65(4):896-901 [PMID: 7358849]
  22. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):421-7 [PMID: 9476853]
  23. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;38(3):153-61 [PMID: 18239257]
  24. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2007;36(3):253-61 [PMID: 17361027]
  25. Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733 [PMID: 32061315]
  26. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 21;7(1):1039 [PMID: 28432323]
  27. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 15;6:15873 [PMID: 26976672]

MeSH Term

Humans
Pilot Projects
Erythrocytes
Diabetes Mellitus
Erythrocyte Deformability
Erythrocyte Indices

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RBCbloodanalysisparametersDM[Formula:seetext]derivedroutinecellssignalsCoulterassociatedredtwonewalterationspilotstudycomparesamplesdiabetesmellitusgroupcontrol0predictivevaluehematologicalinstrumentscountedsizedmonitoringimpedanceinducedpassageorificeHowevercenteredpathsapertureconsideredrejectedmeasurementscausednear-walltrajectoriescanprovideadditionalinformationrecentpublicationssuggestassessusefulnessdescribingpropertiesperformedpatientsfrequentpathologicalconditionimpairmentdeformabilityversuscontrolstotal345analyzed:225120diagramimpedancemetrypulsesuseddistributionsubpopulationsgroupsdiscriminateindividualsbasedmultiparametricbuiltscorevariablesmatrixshowedgoodperformances:areareceivingoperatingcharacteristiccurve948920-0970p<00001bestdiscriminatingvalue:negative947%positive784%resultsseempromisingapproachlaboratorypracticerelatedpotentialclinicallyrelevantoutcomesremaininvestigatedNewerythrocyteprinciplerelatecellproperties-A

Similar Articles

Cited By