Identifying reasons for non-acceptance of influenza vaccine in healthcare workers: an observational study using declination form data.

Aimee Challenger, Petroc Sumner, Eryl Powell, Lewis Bott
Author Information
  1. Aimee Challenger: World Health Organization Collaborating Centre On Investment for Health and Wellbeing, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
  2. Petroc Sumner: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
  3. Eryl Powell: Aneurin Bevan Gwent Public Health Team, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Wales, UK.
  4. Lewis Bott: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, 70 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK. bottla@cardiff.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are sometimes required to complete a declination form if they choose not to accept the influenza vaccine. We analysed the declination data with the goal of identifying barriers to vaccination uptake across seasons, staff groups, and pre- and post- arrival of COVID-19.
METHODS: Reasons for declining the vaccine were gathered from N = 2230 declination forms, collected over four influenza seasons, 2017/2018, 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021, from a single health board in the UK. Reasons were classified according to ten categories and the resulting distribution analysed across year and staff groups. A further analysis considered the two most prevalent categories in more detail.
RESULTS: Fear of adverse reactions and Lack of perception of own risk were identified as primary reasons for not accepting the vaccine across time and across staff groups. However, there was no evidence that Lack of concern with influenza, or Doubts about vaccine efficacy was prevalent, contrary to previous findings. Overall, reasons fitted a pattern of underestimating risk associated with influenza and overestimating risk of minor adverse reactions. There were also differences across years, χ(24) = 123, p < .001. In particular, there were relatively fewer Lack of perception of own risk responses post-COVID-19 arrival than before, χ(8) = 28.93, p = .002.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that data collected from declination forms yields sensible information concerning vaccine non-acceptance without the difficulties of retrospective or pre-emptive reasoning suffered by questionnaires. Our findings will aid messaging campaigns designed to encourage uptake of the influenza vaccine in healthcare workers. In particular, we argue for an approach focused on risk perception rather than correction of straightforward misconceptions.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):853 [PMID: 30428886]
  2. Vaccine. 2006 May 8;24(19):4212-21 [PMID: 16546308]
  3. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Jul;7(7):728-33 [PMID: 21705859]
  4. Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1285-1300 [PMID: 29248255]
  5. Vaccine. 2014 Jun 24;32(30):3830-4 [PMID: 24837775]
  6. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):302-8 [PMID: 18462141]
  7. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 May 12;2(1):e000079 [PMID: 26019875]
  8. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Mar 4;14(3):772-789 [PMID: 28787234]
  9. Lancet. 2017 Aug 12;390(10095):697-708 [PMID: 28302313]
  10. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 5;35(2):205-207 [PMID: 27919630]
  11. Vaccine. 2020 May 27;38(26):4183-4190 [PMID: 32381480]
  12. Vaccine. 2018 Apr 5;36(15):1996-2004 [PMID: 29519593]
  13. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Apr;64(4):223-7 [PMID: 17182640]
  14. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170550 [PMID: 28125629]
  15. Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jun;43(6):624-8 [PMID: 25798775]
  16. J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jul;96(3):268-275 [PMID: 28283372]
  17. Vaccine. 2020 Oct 21;38(45):7049-7056 [PMID: 32980199]
  18. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 14;7(4):e26734 [PMID: 33651708]
  19. Vaccine. 2008 Mar 10;26(11):1408-10 [PMID: 18313179]
  20. BMJ. 2016 Dec 7;355:i6258 [PMID: 27927672]
  21. Public Health Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;29(2):116-25 [PMID: 22372448]
  22. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Apr;69(4):230-5 [PMID: 22172951]
  23. Nurs Older People. 2019 Mar 22;31(2):32-39 [PMID: 31468782]
  24. Vaccine. 2009 Jun 19;27(30):3935-44 [PMID: 19467744]
  25. J Infect Prev. 2020 May;21(3):115-118 [PMID: 32494295]
  26. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 01;2:CD001269 [PMID: 29388196]
  27. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Mar 3;12(3):671-81 [PMID: 26619125]
  28. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;10(4): [PMID: 35455354]
  29. Infect Dis Health. 2019 Feb;24(1):3-12 [PMID: 30541694]
  30. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):732 [PMID: 29141619]
  31. Vaccine. 2012 Feb 1;30(6):1143-8 [PMID: 22192850]
  32. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Oct;48(10):1281-9 [PMID: 21474136]
  33. J Clin Nurs. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):2112-2124 [PMID: 34716635]
  34. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Aug 3;17(8):2389-2396 [PMID: 33861165]
  35. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 17;10:71 [PMID: 20236548]
  36. Vaccine. 2022 Nov 28;40(50):7262-7269 [PMID: 36333226]
  37. Infection. 2021 Jun;49(3):387-399 [PMID: 33284427]
  38. Arch Med Res. 2011 Nov;42(8):652-7 [PMID: 22227045]
  39. Am J Infect Control. 2013 Sep;41(9):824-30 [PMID: 23485370]

MeSH Term

Humans
Influenza Vaccines
Influenza, Human
Retrospective Studies
Attitude of Health Personnel
Health Personnel
Vaccination
Surveys and Questionnaires
COVID-19

Chemicals

Influenza Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccineinfluenzadeclinationacrossriskperceptiondatastaffgroupsformsLackreasonsworkersformanalyseduptakeseasonsarrivalReasonscollectedcategoriesprevalentadversereactionsfindingsχparticularstudynon-acceptancehealthcareBACKGROUND:Healthcaresometimesrequiredcompletechooseacceptgoalidentifyingbarriersvaccinationpre-post-COVID-19METHODS:declininggatheredN = 2230four2017/20182018/20192019/20202020/2021singlehealthboardUKclassifiedaccordingtenresultingdistributionyearanalysisconsideredtwodetailRESULTS:FearidentifiedprimaryacceptingtimeHoweverevidenceconcernDoubtsefficacycontrarypreviousOverallfittedpatternunderestimatingassociatedoverestimatingminoralsodifferencesyears24 = 123p <001relativelyfewerresponsespost-COVID-198 = 2893p = 002CONCLUSION:showsyieldssensibleinformationconcerningwithoutdifficultiesretrospectivepre-emptivereasoningsufferedquestionnaireswillaidmessagingcampaignsdesignedencourageargueapproachfocusedrathercorrectionstraightforwardmisconceptionsIdentifyingworkers:observationalusingAttitudesDeclinationInfluenzaRiskVaccination

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)