Native American Community Perspectives on Oral Health Access: Understanding the Impact of Rurality.

Amanda J Llaneza, Alex Holt, Lancer Stephens, Julie Seward
Author Information
  1. Amanda J Llaneza: Southern Plains Tribal Health Board, Oklahoma City, OK 73114, USA.
  2. Alex Holt: Southern Plains Tribal Health Board, Oklahoma City, OK 73114, USA.
  3. Lancer Stephens: Health Promotion Sciences, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
  4. Julie Seward: Southern Plains Tribal Health Board, Oklahoma City, OK 73114, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral health disparities related to access persist for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities compared to the general population, especially in rural areas of the United States. The objective of this study was to better understand community perspectives of oral health, how rurality impacts access to care, and attitudes towards the implementation of dental therapists in Oklahoma, particularly among the AI/AN population.
METHODS: A descriptive, observational study design was utilized. An exploratory survey was conducted online and comprised of qualitative and quantitative data. The total frequencies and percentages were evaluated for the quantitative questions. The qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Utilizing descriptive and qualitative research methods, the focus was to describe the experiences of the respondents and their characteristics related to oral health in Oklahoma.
RESULTS: A total of 201 responses were obtained, where 65% (n = 131) identified as an enrolled member or employee of a tribe represented in Oklahoma. Key qualitative themes included community access to care, community concerns, and community motivated solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: AI/AN communities are an underserved group in healthcare. Although communities in rural areas face major barriers to oral health services, evidence-based solutions can be implemented.

Keywords

References

  1. Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):34-36 [PMID: 30834206]
  2. J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:321604 [PMID: 24669226]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(S1):S28-S29 [PMID: 28661805]
  4. J Community Health. 2013 Oct;38(5):976-93 [PMID: 23543372]
  5. Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):198-205 [PMID: 18474881]
  6. J Public Health Dent. 2018 Mar;78(2):175-182 [PMID: 29377127]
  7. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 29;19(1):126 [PMID: 32727486]
  8. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):907-15 [PMID: 14644893]
  9. J Dent Educ. 2022 Sep;86(9):1242-1248 [PMID: 36165261]
  10. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):19-34 [PMID: 29503284]
  11. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;51(4):615-620 [PMID: 36812148]
  12. J Rural Health. 2005 Winter;21(1):31-8 [PMID: 15667007]
  13. Med Care. 2021 Oct 1;59(Suppl 5):S441-S448 [PMID: 34524241]
  14. Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(S1):S32-S33 [PMID: 28661821]
  15. Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jan;30(1):21-29 [PMID: 30392148]
  16. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016 Feb;27(1 Suppl):1-10 [PMID: 26853195]

Grants

  1. U54 GM104938/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthoralaccesscommunityqualitativeAmericanNativeAI/ANcommunitiesOklahomaOraldisparitiesrelatedIndian/AlaskapopulationruralareasstudycaredescriptivequantitativedatatotalsolutionshealthcarePURPOSE:persistcomparedgeneralespeciallyUnitedStatesobjectivebetterunderstandperspectivesruralityimpactsattitudestowardsimplementationdentaltherapistsparticularlyamongMETHODS:observationaldesignutilizedexploratorysurveyconductedonlinecomprisedfrequenciespercentagesevaluatedquestionsanalyzedusingthematicanalysisUtilizingresearchmethodsfocusdescribeexperiencesrespondentscharacteristicsRESULTS:201responsesobtained65%n=131identifiedenrolledmemberemployeetriberepresentedKeythemesincludedconcernsmotivatedCONCLUSIONS:underservedgroupAlthoughfacemajorbarriersservicesevidence-basedcanimplementedCommunityPerspectivesHealthAccess:UnderstandingImpactRuralityprevention

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)