In Situ Visible Spectroscopic Daily Monitoring of Senescence of Japanese Maple () Leaves.

Satoru Nakashima, Eri Yamakita
Author Information
  1. Satoru Nakashima: Research Institute for Natural Environment, Science and Technology (RINEST), 3-6-32 1F Tarumi-cho, Suita 564-0062, Osaka, Japan. ORCID
  2. Eri Yamakita: Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan.

Abstract

The degradation of green leaves in autumn after their photosynthetic activities is associated with decreases in chlorophylls and increases in anthocyanins. However, the sequential orders of these processes are not well understood because of a lack of continuous monitoring of leaves in the same positions. Therefore, the senescence processes of Japanese maple () leaves were followed daily in the same positions for approximately 60 days using visible spectroscopy with an original handheld visible-near-infrared spectrometer. The obtained reflection spectra were converted to absorption spectra and band areas of chlorophyll a and anthocyanins were determined. Decreases in the chlorophyll a band area with time show two-step exponential decreases corresponding to slow and fast first-order decrease rates. A rapid decrease in chlorophyll a started after an increase in anthocyanin. Therefore, the leaf senescence started through a slow decrease in chlorophyll a (20-30 days), followed by a rapid increase in anthocyanins (~20 days), followed by a rapid decrease in chlorophyll a (10-20 days). The formation of anthocyanins has been proposed to protect leaf cells from losing chlorophylls through solar radiation damage. The obtained sequential changes of pigments support this light screen hypothesis. (199 words < 200 words).

Keywords

References

  1. Plant Physiol. 2008 Sep;148(1):108-18 [PMID: 18633118]
  2. Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 12;11(6): [PMID: 35336641]
  3. Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Mar;14(3):155-62 [PMID: 19237309]
  4. BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):589 [PMID: 36526968]
  5. Tree Physiol. 2001 Jan;21(1):1-8 [PMID: 11260818]
  6. J Exp Bot. 2021 Jun 22;72(13):4625-4633 [PMID: 33860301]
  7. Am J Bot. 2009 Oct;96(10):1861-8 [PMID: 21622307]
  8. Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Sep;56(1):1-14 [PMID: 15604725]
  9. Trends Plant Sci. 2021 May;26(5):484-495 [PMID: 33422426]
  10. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Jun 1;1708(1):91-101 [PMID: 15949987]
  11. Data Brief. 2019 Mar 29;24:103875 [PMID: 31011597]
  12. J Plant Physiol. 2018 Mar;222:94-102 [PMID: 29425814]
  13. Appl Spectrosc. 2014;68(7):740-8 [PMID: 25014840]
  14. Plant Cell. 2009 Mar;21(3):700 [PMID: 19304932]
  15. Foods. 2021 Aug 15;10(8): [PMID: 34441668]
  16. Plant Physiol. 2001 Oct;127(2):566-74 [PMID: 11598230]
  17. Int J Food Sci. 2013;2013:271271 [PMID: 26904594]
  18. Plant Cell. 2009 Mar;21(3):767-85 [PMID: 19304936]
  19. Plant Cell. 2007 May;19(5):1649-64 [PMID: 17513504]
  20. J Exp Bot. 2018 Feb 12;69(4):751-767 [PMID: 28992212]
  21. FEBS Lett. 2007 Nov 27;581(28):5517-25 [PMID: 17996203]
  22. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Nov 12;56(21):9813-8 [PMID: 18817411]
  23. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011 Aug;1807(8):977-88 [PMID: 21167811]
  24. Int J Anal Chem. 2017;2017:2863454 [PMID: 29333161]
  25. J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Jun;47(6):2404-9 [PMID: 10794643]
  26. Appl Spectrosc. 2019 Jul;73(7):781-793 [PMID: 30585086]