The impact of innovative behaviors on academic misconduct among graduate students: a mediated moderation model.

Peng Su, Mu He
Author Information
  1. Peng Su: School of Marxism, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.
  2. Mu He: College of Marxism, Chongqing Medical College and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China.

Abstract

Introduction: Academic misconduct among graduate students poses a significant challenge in graduate education. This study aims to explore the impact of innovative behavior on graduate student academic misconduct and its underlying mechanisms.
Methods: A survey was conducted on 677 graduate students currently enrolled in Beijing universities to assess their innovative behavior, academic misconduct, academic anxiety, employment confidence, educational levels, among other factors. The study analyzed the mediating roles of academic anxiety, employment confidence, and educational levels in the relationship between innovative behavior and graduate student academic misconduct.
Results: Graduate student innovative behavior exerts a negative predictive effect on academic misconduct, with a stronger emphasis on innovative behavior associated with a reduced likelihood of academic misconduct. Academic anxiety plays a mediating role in the relationship between graduate student innovative behavior and academic misconduct. Educational levels and employment confidence each play moderating roles in the latter stages of the mediation effects concerning graduate student innovative behavior, academic anxiety, and academic misconduct.
Conclusion: This study reveals the mediating role of academic anxiety in the relationship between innovative behavior and graduate student academic misconduct. It also identifies the moderating roles of employment confidence and educational levels. These findings deepen our understanding of the relationship between innovative behavior and graduate student academic misconduct and are conducive to preventing such misconduct among graduate students.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 05;13:1009305 [PMID: 36275294]
  2. Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):372-393 [PMID: 33048578]
  3. Psychiatr Q. 2021 Dec;92(4):1745-1757 [PMID: 34373982]
  4. BMC Psychol. 2022 Aug 3;10(1):192 [PMID: 35922866]
  5. BMC Res Notes. 2016 Apr 25;9:234 [PMID: 27112550]
  6. Am Psychol. 2000 Nov;55(11):1247-63 [PMID: 11280938]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2008 Nov;134(6):779-806 [PMID: 18954157]
  8. Nurse Educ. 2019 Sep/Oct;44(5):239-244 [PMID: 30418342]
  9. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 04;13:925195 [PMID: 35992454]
  10. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 09;13:980634 [PMID: 36160584]
  11. Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1-22 [PMID: 26609740]
  12. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67 [PMID: 10620381]
  13. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:665196 [PMID: 34721131]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1334-45 [PMID: 18234406]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0academicmisconductgraduateinnovativebehaviorstudentanxietyemploymentconfidenceamongeducationallevelsrelationshipstudentsstudymediatingrolesAcademicimpactrolemoderatingIntroduction:posessignificantchallengeeducationaimsexploreunderlyingmechanismsMethods:surveyconducted677currentlyenrolledBeijinguniversitiesassessfactorsanalyzedResults:GraduateexertsnegativepredictiveeffectstrongeremphasisassociatedreducedlikelihoodplaysEducationalplaylatterstagesmediationeffectsconcerningConclusion:revealsalsoidentifiesfindingsdeepenunderstandingconducivepreventingbehaviorsstudents:mediatedmoderationmodellevel

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.