Developing a set of patient-centered outcomes for routine use in endometriosis: An international Delphi study.

Alba Nicolas-Boluda, Enora Le Roux, Arounie Tavenet, Jerome Bouaziz, Paolo Vercellini, Pamela Stratton, Arnaud Fauconnier
Author Information
  1. Alba Nicolas-Boluda: One Clinic, Paris, France. ORCID
  2. Enora Le Roux: Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hôpital Universitaire Robert Debré, AP-HP Nord-Université de Paris, Inserm, CIC 1426, Paris, France. ORCID
  3. Arounie Tavenet: EndoFrance, Dagneux, France.
  4. Jerome Bouaziz: One Clinic, Paris, France. ORCID
  5. Paolo Vercellini: Gynecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. ORCID
  6. Pamela Stratton: Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. ORCID
  7. Arnaud Fauconnier: Research Unit 7285 Clinical Risks and Safety in Women's Health and Perinatal Health (RISCQ), UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is large variation in individual patient care for endometriosis. A uniform approach to measure outcomes could be incorporated into routine clinical practice to personalize and monitor treatments and potentially improve the quality of care. The aim of this study is to identify a group of patient-centered outcomes for use in routine endometriosis care which are relevant to all patient profiles.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: By means of a modified two-round Delphi study with international representation including healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives (51 participants, 16 countries) we developed a set of patient-centered measurements. The participants evaluated 47 Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and 30 Clinician Reported Outcome Measures (CROMs) regarding their feasibility and relevance for their use in routine endometriosis care. After the two rounds of quotation, meetings of the experts were convened to participate in a final discussion to finalize the consensus of the final set of included measures.
RESULTS: The final set of patient-centered outcomes includes six PROMs (measuring symptomatic impact, pain, work productivity and quality of life) and 10 CROMs (measuring clinical, imaging and surgical indicators). A supplementary list of outcomes was added to include important dimensions that were considered essential by the expert panel but are not relevant to all patients. In addition the need for development of specific tools (PROMs) measuring the psychological impact and the impact in sexual activity of endometriosis was highlighted.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a set of patient-centered outcomes measures in endometriosis care. The selected outcomes comprise the common features for all patients suffering from endometriosis. adapted for use in routine practice. The list of outcomes has been adapted for use in routine practice from which clinicians can chose, depending on their needs.

Keywords

References

  1. BJOG. 2020 Jul;127(8):967-974 [PMID: 32227676]
  2. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):157-61 [PMID: 12525459]
  3. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 30;2020:3583989 [PMID: 32083128]
  4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1165-1175 [PMID: 33483970]
  5. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 [PMID: 6880820]
  6. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2005 Oct;127(5):275-81 [PMID: 16195969]
  7. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):318-32 [PMID: 27349699]
  8. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208 [PMID: 10782451]
  9. Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1086-1096 [PMID: 29871796]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jul 1;35(7):1589-1600 [PMID: 32619220]
  11. Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2686-94 [PMID: 23900205]
  12. Qual Life Res. 2004 Apr;13(3):695-704 [PMID: 15130031]
  13. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jan;103(1):138-152 [PMID: 37905359]
  14. BMC Womens Health. 2019 May 14;19(1):64 [PMID: 31088434]
  15. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1233-43 [PMID: 25256929]
  16. Hum Reprod. 2003 Aug;18(8):1712-5 [PMID: 12871888]
  17. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Jul 19;4(1):9 [PMID: 30026507]
  18. BMC Womens Health. 2016 Sep 21;16(1):64 [PMID: 27653503]
  19. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1223-32 [PMID: 25256930]
  20. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 24;8:138 [PMID: 21106059]
  21. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):81-90 [PMID: 8901370]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22): [PMID: 34831868]
  23. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):216-22 [PMID: 7749697]
  24. Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):2-14 [PMID: 28212963]
  25. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 21;10(15): [PMID: 34362000]
  26. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):824-833 [PMID: 30989214]
  27. Can J Nurs Adm. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(3):29-42 [PMID: 7880844]
  28. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Feb 18;4(1):13 [PMID: 32072316]
  29. Womens Health (Lond). 2007 Sep;3(5):629-35 [PMID: 19804040]
  30. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1213-22 [PMID: 25150390]
  31. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 30;10(21): [PMID: 34768627]
  32. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22 [PMID: 20298572]
  33. Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):88-97 [PMID: 28049214]
  34. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1244-53 [PMID: 25256928]
  35. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 29;10:233-241 [PMID: 31534379]
  36. Psychosom Med. 1968 Nov-Dec;30(6):853-67 [PMID: 5749738]
  37. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1244-1256 [PMID: 32212520]
  38. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476 [PMID: 21694759]
  39. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):258-64 [PMID: 11506842]
  40. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65 [PMID: 10146874]
  41. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 27;10:631-40 [PMID: 27175063]
  42. BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818 [PMID: 25670183]
  43. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 May;9(2):115-9 [PMID: 11960033]

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Endometriosis
Delphi Technique
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient-Centered Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0outcomesendometriosiscareroutinepatient-centeredusesetpatientmeasurespracticestudyPROMsfinalmeasuringimpactclinicalqualityrelevantDelphiinternationalparticipantsdevelopedReportedOutcomeMeasuresCROMslistpatientsadaptedreportedoutcomeINTRODUCTION:largevariationindividualuniformapproachmeasureincorporatedpersonalizemonitortreatmentspotentiallyimproveaimidentifygroupprofilesMATERIALANDMETHODS:meansmodifiedtwo-roundrepresentationincludinghealthcareprofessionalsresearchersrepresentatives5116countriesmeasurementsevaluated47Patient30ClinicianregardingfeasibilityrelevancetworoundsquotationmeetingsexpertsconvenedparticipatediscussionfinalizeconsensusincludedRESULTS:includessixsymptomaticpainworkproductivitylife10imagingsurgicalindicatorssupplementaryaddedincludeimportantdimensionsconsideredessentialexpertpaneladditionneeddevelopmentspecifictoolspsychologicalsexualactivityhighlightedCONCLUSIONS:selectedcomprisecommonfeaturessufferingclinicianscanchosedependingneedsDevelopingendometriosis:clinicianvalue-basedhealth

Similar Articles

Cited By